[MrPaco - GeForce FX 5950 Ultra @ 610/520MHz - 7792 marks 3DMark03]

nice...

[MrPaco - GeForce FX 5950 Ultra @ 610/520MHz - 7792 marks 3DMark03]

Thank you

[MrPaco - GeForce FX 5950 Ultra @ 610/520MHz - 7792 marks 3DMark03]

Never

[Matti OC - GeForce FX 5950 Ultra @ 570/505MHz - 7776 marks 3DMark03]

nice one Mattie

[MrPaco - GeForce FX 5950 Ultra @ 610/520MHz - 7730 marks 3DMark03]

Only SP in 2nd stage is cpu limited...

[Witchdoctor. - Radeon R9 290X @ 1502/1649MHz - 16sec 236ms GPUPI - 1B]

Great run!

[chispy - 2x Radeon R9 290X @ 1295/1652MHz - 9sec 820ms GPUPI - 1B]

¡Por fin!... Nice to see you around again...

 

[Socket 479 fixes]

I just gotta say; You 2 guys make a helluva tag team... Definitely keep up the great work.

[Mobile clarification]

Bumpity Bump

[ShrimpBrime - FX-8300 @ 7528.7MHz - 7528.7 mhz CPU Frequency]

NICE! Getting closer...

[Mobile clarification]

If the above request is not in the data base could it please be added...

[Remembering Turrican: Bench for a good cause (and buy a T-shirt)]

I want to say thank you for the staffs help.

[Remembering Turrican: Bench for a good cause (and buy a T-shirt)]

Probably ? (i dont really know)

Cause the result moderators didnt have enough data about that cpu.

 

You could have helped them a bit , by providing an actual photo of that cpu ... and also a screenshot from an older cpuz version , that recognised the cpu.

 

That's my thoughts.

I gave what info I thought would be enough.

The cpu ihs markings have all thinned out so much you cant see any writing on it, so that would have done no good.

All the cpuz versions I have tried all show the same. I have not tried them all.

Turrican added the cpu himself to the data base on 05-06-2011

http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=25536

[Remembering Turrican: Bench for a good cause (and buy a T-shirt)]

How do you mean?

 

This 0.8mhz s423 cpu is from MARCH 2000, 8 months older than the P4-1.4 & 1.5 that are from November 2000.

I submitted it on the 27th for stage-1 before the end of the comp and it was not put into the rankings as the oldest cpu. My submission of the 1.5 is the one still in the rankings.

[Mobile clarification]

Could you please point me to the correct cpu category for submitting this:

http://valid.canardpc.com/a/9uwk0v

[Please add motherboard]

Thank you ...

[macsbeach98 - Pentium 4 1.5Ghz Willamette s423 @ 1980MHz - 8h 51min 34sec 10ms GPUPI for CPU - 1B]

Still a dam good run...

[Remembering Turrican: Bench for a good cause (and buy a T-shirt)]

Excuse me but why wast my submission added to the competition?

http://hwbot.org/submission/2776088_

[MrPaco - Pentium 4 0.8Ghz Willamette S423 @ 1200MHz - 14h 57min 24sec 564ms GPUPI for CPU - 1B]

MARCH 2000 http://www.engineering-sample.com/index.php?folder=/Intel/Pentium%20IV%20Family/Pentium%204%200800%20Mhz%20ES/

Not a celeron. Not read correctly by CPUZ

[Please add motherboard]

Could you please add this Hewlett Packard 227F mobo to the data base?

http://valid.canardpc.com/m4q1jw

[ozzie - Core 2 X6800 (2.93Ghz) @ 4037MHz - 12sec 594ms SuperPi - 1M]

Youre doing fine ozzie

[Some love for Old School Hardware?]

Would be cool to see if some Multie-socket CPU action could be added somewhere in there too

[Feature requests : Please add SSD]

Thank you Massman :celebration:

[MrPaco - Pentium 4 1.5Ghz Willamette s423 @ 1800MHz - 9h 38min 40sec 284ms GPUPI for CPU - 1B]

Most definitely...

[Feature requests : Please add SSD]

Ticket ID: 1957

 

Priority: Medium

 

Could you please add this 15gb IBM ssd to the data base?\r\nNot sure what would be used as model number:

GBRLB015XVEUCM

or

43W7678

or

44E9159IBM

 

 

Thank you