mr.paco
-
Posts
820 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by mr.paco
-
-
Ticket ID: 1569
Priority: Low
I have another mother board with multiple personality (names)
\r\na Foxconn that came out of a Dell Inspiron 530.Printed on the board is: FOXCONN G33M02
Everest sees it as: Inspiron 530
CPUZ sees it as: 0RY007
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2484762
How you add it is fine with me
This a totaly different board from my 0RY007 submission: http://hwbot.org/submission/2203791_mr.paco_reference_clock_0ry007_265.37_mhz
This is it:
Thanx...
-
Thank you...
-
Ticket ID: 1568
Priority: Medium
Could you please add this ECS ELITEGROUP motherboard. On the board it has L4VXA2 as model, EVEREST reads it that way as well.
However cpuz reads the board as P4X400-8235
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2483506
You would know which to add to data base
-
Ticket ID: 1567
Priority: Medium
Could you please add this INTEL D850MV motherboard?
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2481635
Thank you.
-
As always; Thank you Karl
-
Ticket ID: 1566
Priority: Medium
The number of default cores for these 2 cpus are two, but Bot has em as one core as a result when making a submission with default cores they do not show up in the rankings cause bot sees em as a single core that was run as 2 cores
http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/sempron_x2_180/
http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/sempron_x2_190/
-
Ticket ID: 1558
Priority: Medium
Could you add this Intel Tuscon TC430HX
Thank you
-
Ok Works. Now reads my K10 fine. Thanx
Now to see about my other platforms
-
If you are submitting anything other than CPU Frequency, mem frequency, reference clock results... you can just use an old working version of CPUz for the screenshots. CPUz being broken in new versions really only impacts CPUz validations, which are only required for those benches.
Just thought I'd mention this, as it seems maybe some people are worried about CPUz functionality for subs other than those.
Thanx for the info I.M.O.G, good to know...
Only sad part is that in the current TEAM CUP they have the MEMORY CLOCK portion
-
Ah Ok Got-cha, Thanx.
Wonder if any one else has had this issue too with Aqua M3?
-
Mr. Paco, that issue is probably similar to this one that was just fixed:
The issue you linked to was about WPrime.
I dont know if they similar, might be. Mine is that the bot engine dosnt see my aqua mark as the latest 0.0.1
Just tried it again with a fresh os install & a new download of the wrapper n app....still no good
-
Even after downloading & installing the latest, I keep getting the following error.
Installs n runs the bench just fine but after submitting the run is where the issue is.
-
Just another example, not as bad as the others I posted but lets face it, here at Bot every mhz counts
-
Agreed, Couldn't he (Franck) allow the last working version to remain able to validate until he is able to work out all the bugs in this latest version?
-
Should be ok in the last build (also named 1.61.2)
Went and did a new download...
Still no good
. Tried both the .exe & the zip version 
-
Yeah I learned that the hard way. For 3D Mark 06 the resolution must be 1280 x 1024. So when running on a laptop that wont support that resolution you can simply hook it up to a desktop monitor
-
You gotta hook your LapTop to an external monitor so it will run at 1280 x 1024 not 1280 x 800
-
-
the link is from kinpin run lmao
http://hwbot.org/submission/2272323_kingpin_3dmark_vantage___performance_geforce_gtx_680_55423_marks
WTF is up with that ? -
Thank you sir
-
Your resolution is 1280 x 768 must be at 1280 x 1024.
And your validation link is for a GTX680 running 3Dmark Vantage.
Might wana fix it
... -
Ticket ID: 1546
Priority: Medium
Could you please add this FUGUTECH M701 socket-8 motherboard?
Thank you
-
This is on my 965be on M4N78Pro. its sourpose to be all stock speeds.....
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2440243
Did some one fall a sleep at the controls
?How are we to go forward with so many issues with the main validation tool used?
-
My turn.
I have a Pentium Pro 200 and versions from 1.60 up to 1.61.2 do not fully support the cpu, the ram or the motherboard. And I get the following report when trying to validate
Better support in version 1.59, still no motherboard but at least it shows the cpu n ram speeds but of course cant validate because its an older version
Why is support for ANY cpu removed when making a newer version?
How would I go about submitting my runs with the above issues?
MrPaco - Sempron 150 @ 3915.2MHz - 14416 marks PCMark 2005
in Result Discussions
Posted
Thank you.