Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

mr.paco

Members
  • Posts

    820
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mr.paco

  1. I just don't understand why anyone thinks this has to do with jealousy or envy.. I don't give a shit about who has the highest scores.

    i just want clear rules. people have been comparing and discussing the wrong things today. Like Mr. Paco is doing in his post.

    Because based on your comment "how come I scored higher than you if I was clocked 500mhz lower than you". Thats why

     

    even if i uncheck the cpu test in 3dmark tests it does not affect the GRAPHIC settings of the benchmark. which are the one of influence of the score.

    The point is, its NOT truly default if you check or un-check ANYTHING except for RUN BENCH

     

    if you allow the affinity 'tweak' we should also allow 3dmark 11 entry submissions as performance ones. Cause in fact that is what happens when fiddling around with the ucbench settings.

    I'm not much of 3d bencher dont know where that is going. but as far as the affinity tweak as you call it. Its not a tweak if all I did was to allow the bench to run longer with more thread count as in wprime

     

    but lets just stop this discussion, it is leading to nowhere. just want to know if it is allowed so i can 'tweak' my runs in the same way or the tweaked submissions need to be removed...

    If that was true, your question should have simply been: "Is it allowed?..." Period.

    As all the submissions till now have been allowed. I am no mod so I do not speak for them I can only say what has been told to me by them: It is allowed

  2. Default Settings; interesting.

     

    All the bench marks here at Bot are to be run at default settings according to the rules BUT you are allowed to run em and are legit if in:

    3D Mark 01 selecting a few tests and change the order they are ran etc

    3D Mark 03 UN check CPU Test

    3D Mark 05 UN check CPU Test

    3D mark Vantage UN check FEATURE TESTs

    PC Mark 04 Too many to name

    PC Mark 05 WAY TOO many to name

    Wprime 32/1024 change thread count

    and so on.

    All NON default settings. These are just a few examples and UC Bench is no different, No special 3rd party application is being used. I have been running UC Bench since it was first introduced when there were no points given for it and in that time I have learned a few things about the bench,

    yes high cpu speed is essential BUT UC Bench is NOT 110% solely dependent on just CPU clock speed alone. So a 500mhz cpu difference is nothing when it comes to the end results. Its not what you run but how you run it.

    There are those that have ran UC Bench with cpus that have up wards of 16,32 even 64 threads at so called default settings and found that they had to change the line command. So whats the difference.

    I am not trying to defend uc bench or even my runs, but All of my runs on this or any other benchmark are done legit and if I feel its questionable believe me I do contact a mod before submitting it and get an OK or NO GOOD.

    With these runs mentioned (thank you btw, feels good to see that my efforts are noticed :D ) there is no bug, no illegal tweak or anything, its part of the bench mark. I dont see any one debating the non default settings in any of the other bench marks.

    But I guess sooner or later some one had to say :( $#!?... Why I cant score like that

  3. so tell me, how do you acchieve such a score with 500 MHz lower coreclock then me?

    gues there is something in the way you run it cause there is no way this is possible...

    So instead of asking me FIRST, you decided to report it as bugged run :rolleyes:...

    Was already checked and APPROVED by a moderator.

    Some folks have a helluva way to ask for tips/help/advice. To answer your question the way it was asked; I dont know, Try harder I guess.

  4. :confused:Link please. Because all I find are:

    XFX nForce 780i 3-Way SLI http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/nforce_780i_sli/

    XFX nForce 780i SLI (links to the above)

    Evga nForce 780i SLI FTW http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/nforce_780i_sli_ftw/

    Evga nForce 780i SLI FTW The Black Pearl http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/nforce_780i_sli_ftw_the_black_pearl/

    Zotac nForce 780i Supreme http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/nforce_780i_supreme/

     

    I also see this EVGA

    Evga 132-CK-NF79 http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/132_ck_nf79/

    Same as mine, only mine is the "8" not the "9"

×
×
  • Create New...