Moose83

Wow, really awesome mr. Tech

No result.txt and TW is way too high;)

Yeah, thats the point, i know thats not allowed;) But why it is saying in this submit its allowed? There are lots of these results with Ramcaching in all rankings:(

I searched a bit on this bench to look how good is my storage, but i found an interesting submit with i7 920, and on the comments it was talk about Ramcaching. http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2238591_christian_ney_pcmark_vantage_core_i7_920_41956_marks And here is an normal Areca Score: http://www.hwbot.org/submission/1096127_stevero_pcmark_vantage_core_i7_920_30681_marks/ So, why Ramcaching is in this Bench allowed? Who allowed it? And is it really allowed Its not that fair thought, to allow Ramcaching, can we have a clear point about Ramcaching in Vantage please? Or am i allowed to score 800000 HDD Points:D

On ATI you can force Tessalation of, its also Software, for me its fully legit;)

Not nice, fail This is 1m not 32m

Lol, you honk;) To you really think, i search 1000 of submits for any errors, lol...

Nice one

Thanks, but had bad performance in this run, and had to use other Rams, my 1GB modules went wet:D

Nice one, good work;)

Its deleted now, forgot this one only;)

Nice work!

I didnt use Areca for VS, i use onboard for this. Look at Sofos 960T submit how much VS he has done;)

Damn nice:D

Thanks Denis:)

This was Stock i7 920 and VS on Areca;) In pcm05 i use onboard for VS;)

Because...Ähm whats your BACKUP:D

Nice nice:)

Hey nice, i have this card:) Now i can try your Mod

Not bad, keep pushing;)

You naild all benchmarks with this card:) congrats;)

Of course, i used Areca 1882ix for this test. But i was really surprised about the PCMVantage result, only 3 840 Pro declass 5 OCZ Vector:)

For PCMark? No, because in Read Speeds and Iops both are the same;) The 256GB Version is only faster in write Speeds, but with Controller, thats not an issue:)

Today i did some test with 5 OCZ Vector and 3 Samsung 840 pro, all in the 128GB Variant:D I was very surprised, when i finished compare these drives, the OCZ Vector ist not bad at all, but it looses against the Samsung 840 Pro. In PCM05 both are really near together, but in PCMark Vantage, the Samsung declasses the Vector much! This was the last time for me, i buy OCZ SSDs, on Paper it looks like the strongest SSD on the market, but the tests show, that this is not more than marketing. Also Support for OCZ is an shame, there toolbox is not available for the Vector Here you can find my test with both SSDS, 3 Samsung against 5 OCZ, shame on you OCZ! http://www.freeocen.de/index.php?page=Thread&postID=213424#post213424 Post 3816;)

Because...ähm i cant manage Denis crazy tweaks