Jump to content

Moose83

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Moose83

  1. Mh, thin the update, Hwbot gets very slow here:( And When i want to go to the Benchmarks on Hwbot Main page, nothing happened:(
  2. So now there are 4 Guyz that can confirm this VS isnt possible You want more than 50% needs confirme, than this is an case where it is needed. 1000 VS vs. his 1500VS;)
  3. Isnt it enough, that no one can score this? He beat guyz that have 500MHz more CPU Power... SteveRo has 990FX at home, im too.And 1,5G VS is no problem onboard, but only on more than 1 core. Normal range is between 800 and 1G on 990FX with sempron;)
  4. No, he is the only one that have 1,5G VS on sempron;)
  5. There are more than 3 guyz, all say its not possible! 1,5-2G VS is possible, but not on singlecore. I wonder how much you can score with X4... 3G? And sector size change is easy to made with all Plattform, no need for raid expert!
  6. I think it was prereleased 12.8 driver... Ask SteveRo or Gluvocio, no one can do such an VS on sempron. And acards onboard are slower than SSDs, i tested a lot on 990FX, normal VS is between 800 and 1000. Explain it to Mr. Pro, lets see if he can verify your VS;)
  7. Yeah i dont think there is much in IE10, but i give it a shoot: ) Edit, lol IE10 is totally crapp... I5 661 Stock, IE9 24,5 pages I5 661 Stock, IE10 14,5 pages...
  8. So this VS is too high! What have you used? Ramcaching? Sector size change? explain, 1,5G isnt possible with sempron onboard!
  9. So we all talk about what is right and whats wrong...i found an interesting submit, wich pretty shure is outside actually rules... 1,5G VS with sempron singlecore... never possible on 2 acards at SB;) http://hwbot.org/submission/2257400_el_gappo_pcmark_2005_sempron_145_23485_marks
  10. From what i hear, win 7 is much faster. IE10 i will test today;)
  11. I think this decission is good;) All old scores are safe, and we areca benchers can use RST for nice VS My sector size scores are now off. Mr. Pro, you write again with Team.AU Account:)
  12. Thanks Mr. Pro for clearing this up!
  13. Ok Steve i delete them on weekend;)
  14. Rst was used many years! Want to delete over 90% of all results? Really? Everyone knows it so i dont see there an Problem;) And i allways use 4 SSDs with rst score between 1500 and 2000... Also abnormal for you?
  15. Not stripe size! Sector size is an other thing! Stripe size is legal. But we need decission with RST! Why forbit it? Its an part of System driver/Software;) @ Steve, i allready said, i will deleted:) I will do it in december when i rebench with high clocks.
  16. Thats right RST has been used and accepted over years! When you have Raid Controller, you can use it for gen usage and RST for VS;) Then all have the same Chance in VS. I dont see there an problem. I only see problem in sector size change. I think it must decide faster about RST, new submits use it again, and nearly 90% of all pcm05 submits use RST:)
  17. Yes but actually it is not forbitten to use RST;)
  18. Yes Steve scored 1,7G VS on areca, i only had 2G one time;)
  19. For 2 SSDs its an huge VS i never scored this with 2 SSDs only with 4.
  20. Its no bugged run then! Areca Cache never scored the same in each run! It differences, same like rst. And SSDs on southbridge are faster than ramdrive, they are only fast with Controller. With 2 SSDs 1,3G VS is easy without tricking anything but activate write back in RST! On P45 i score 1,2 with 2 and 1,5G with 4 SSDs;)