alexmaj467

I feel purple, are you going to guess or summon spirits to the tambourine. No cooling radiator, no barcode labels.

Really nothing to do ? Is the photo card not enough ? And the 1002 code that ATI uses for Palit, Powercolor and so on cards.

maybe the problem is due to Global. And we need to wait. On uat, globals were counted first.

Let me know and see the final HW points table. Me for an article promoting motivation.

How about adding stop points of rank. Based on the old system, but without making a recalculation every time the result is filled in. A rank where less than 7 results listens to the table LESS THAN 7 is good. A rank where less than 25 results listens to the table LESS THAN 25 is good. A rank where less than 60 results listens to the table LESS THAN 60 is good. A rank where less than 125 results listens to the table LESS THAN 125 is good. A rank where more than 125 results listens to the table MORE THAN 125 It's not always good. How about adding a point 150. At this point, it checks which table to use next. if rank 125 < = (1 place - 30% or 25% as in the old system or whatever you want.) Then a table is connected in which the calculation is based on the fact that 125 rank is a stop rank. else rank 125 > (1 place - 30% or 25% as in the old system or whatever you want.) Then a table is connected in which the calculation is based on the fact that 220 rank is a stop rank. Adding a point 220. At this point, it checks which table to use next. if rank 175 < = (1 place - 30% or 25% as in the old system or whatever you want.) Then a table is connected in which the calculation is based on the fact that 175 rank is a stop rank. else rank 175 > (1 place - 30% or 25% as in the old system or whatever you want.) Then a table is connected in which the calculation is based on the fact that 300 rank is a stop rank. Perhaps a few more points in the same style. The category that stopped at 125 rank, after 150 results, after adding 50 results on that Nitrogen at the beginning and 20 results at the end. It will be re-checked when 220 results are reached. And it can be opened until the next check, I already use the stop 300 calculation table.

The new system does not work everywhere. LESS THAN 125 https://hwbot.org/benchmark/cpu_frequency/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_940&cores=1#start=0#interval=20 https://hwbot.org/benchmark/cpu_frequency/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_937&cores=1#start=0#interval=20 1 rank = 50 pts - last rank 200 = 25pts https://hwbot.org/benchmark/cpu_frequency/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_2128&cores=2#start=0#interval=20 We need a new recalculation for everything. These are just the first 3 out of 5 examples that come across. But In general, the scheme does not work well with different groups of processors, not to mention Video cards. I will give some examples. Q6600 It has a maximum increase from the nominal value of +120%. For him, the stop ranking on the 287 result is a +- logical thing. Ideally for beginners 350 rank https://hwbot.org/benchmark/cpu_frequency/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_919&cores=4#start=0#interval=20 But Phenom II 2x 555 It also has a maximum of 120% to the nominal value. Following his rating in favor of beginners, you can put a maximum of 200 ranks. https://hwbot.org/benchmark/cpu_frequency/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_2128&cores=2#start=0#interval=20 Celeron 430 It has a maximum increase from the nominal value of +180%. It is logical for him to stop the rank at 140 for beginners. https://hwbot.org/benchmark/cpu_frequency/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_1414&cores=1#start=0#interval=20 I do not know if you will understand me, a simple tip, I am not a coder. You need to consult with the coder whether the following scheme is possible. 1. You need to break all the hardware into 6 categories, depending on the maximum acceleration from the rated frequency. (I think there will be some to help who can share sockets among themselves and view each of their own.) 2. For each group of this iron. Make your own calculation scheme. All points in it will also be predefined (like your new one) But it should be rubber not by the number of results 287, but by % of the maximum acceleration. 3. Put the maximum % for each category with a margin, so as not to recalculate it every time, increase it only in case of global changes. 4. Make a category 7, throw everything new and unknown into it. And as you study, transfer it to the category that is more suitable. It may be complicated and incomprehensible, but it will solve the issue once and for all.

del

Scaling ends at 464 - 480 rank. Think maybe it can be shifted up to 350 rank. 479 rank HW = 2.1 next 2 to all.

I understand the control points. 7 - 25 - 60 - < 125 and > 125. I don't understand. Last rank 92 HW = 11.6 Good no no questions LESS THEN 125 works Last rank 100 HW = 40 why, with a maximum rank of 100, counting turned on MORE THEN 125

It's just not clear why, with the same number of results in the category, the minimum score is different by a large margin.

What is the reason for the minimum score for the last place = 11.6 HW 91 result in the category. CPU Frequency 1xCPU Ranking with a Celeron D 320 (2.40GHz, s478) What is the reason for the minimum score for the last place = 40 HW 97 result in the category. CPU Frequency 1xCPU Ranking with a Pentium III EB 800Mhz (s370) I don't have enough logical assumptions. Links are breaking. Replace %23 characters at the end before interval=20. with one #

Unfortunately, there is no time for this yet.

Good job, maybe I'll continue my work someday.

It's not about him. Read this topic, and then this topic. Skyline - Pentium 3 500Mhz Katmai @ 560MHz - 1334 marks PCMark 2004 PCMark04 ver.130 build 1.0.0 the version where there is a choice of process priority real time allowed or not ?

Maybe. There is an assumption that the first PSC was made by order of Elpida. I just can't explain the similarity of 2b and 3b in any other way.