Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

alexmaj467

Members
  • Content Count

    86
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

alexmaj467 last won the day on February 21 2018

alexmaj467 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

33 Excellent

About alexmaj467

  • Rank
    maintenance bot
  • Birthday 04/16/1980

Converted

  • Location
    Russia

Converted

  • realname
    Алексей

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hardware Masters & just for fun.
  2. I think the test depends on some Windows settings which I have no idea. I set up the OS the same way every time throughout the years, and I have the results go smoothly according to the frequency of the processor (+ - ) throttling from overheating or something. If you look at two results from Prescott. Or you each time for different set up windows , or you have some bugs with the benchmark or framework https://hwbot.org/submission/4202283_mrgenius_black_hole_benchmark_pentium_4_3.4ghz_(prescott)_4828_marks https://hwbot.org/submission/4092084_mrgenius_black_hole_benchmark_pentium_4_3.2ghz_(prescott)_2596_marks Or is it a bug from too high overclocking and instability of the system . Lower the frequency, at 300MHz pass the test, then raise at 100MHz and pass the test and see the results.
  3. I have difficulty with English I write through a translator. I don't know why this is happening. I have with 2014. how did this benchmark always singethreaded high , but in windows 7 it is same low like yours. Here's another 2014 result , unfortunately, the older 478 results with less frequency I have removed but there just as well. https://hwbot.org/submission/2674025_alexmaj467_black_hole_benchmark_athlon_1000_(thunderbird_fsb_133_socket_462)_1455_marks Here is outcome another user which has 1 place and I have the second place with a lesser frequency. https://hwbot.org/submission/3067489_aleslammer_black_hole_benchmark_athlon_64_3200_(manchester)_5454_marks I always configure the OS in this way. But unfortunately it is in Russian, will be of little use, but there is nothing beyond the unknown to configure the OC.
  4. Look at my other results . The higher the frequency the higher the result, the higher the result is not Random but comparable to frequency increase. If this error program only works in Windows XP, I'm not to blame, use WindowsXP is not prohibited.
  5. Use Windows XP only . windows 7 and others bring 40% less points . And Adjust priority and affinity.
  6. Thanks. Not so cold water, about 14 degrees Celsius. Here is a month ago still was 9 degrees. But now the air is closer to +30 and condensate falls immediately.I need to turn the air conditioning on,To get rid of the dew point.
  7. The result is filed in the wrong category. the card that was used 128bit is not 64 bit.Here is the right category transfer the result there. https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce2_mx400_64mb/
  8. Necessary, but not yet comes at a reasonable price. The motherboard is already very tired, I hope it will withstand the overtaking of all my AGP graphics cards.
  9. Good result. Soon I return the result, I just started to sort out my AGP video card from GF2 and above.
  10. Thanks. A good memory, on an Intel platform would be much better.
  11. Thanks. I do not know the benefits, I immediately changed the BIOS and did not try to use the native BIOS . I guess I did it because of better function Load-Line Calibration
  12. Thanks. one of the eight went so well, he needs a SS. Would have been almost everywhere first. china,5603B171(2L604057)A1377
  13. The calculation of points is correct. Just these results somehow so considered, the rest of which I counted more than 80 processors correctly raschitany.
  14. Sorry about my English . I found a bug in the scoring system. I did recalculation of the results GEEKBENCH3 - SINGLE CORE and noticed that if the gap from the first place and the last is more than 25% then this last result gives not 0.2 points but much more. look at the first and last result. https://hwbot.org/benchmark/geekbench3_-_single_core/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_1491 https://hwbot.org/benchmark/geekbench3_-_single_core/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_550 https://hwbot.org/benchmark/geekbench3_-_single_core/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_921 https://hwbot.org/benchmark/geekbench3_-_single_core/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_1316 GEEKBENCH4 - MULTI CORE https://hwbot.org/benchmark/geekbench4_-_multi_core/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_301 https://hwbot.org/benchmark/geekbench4_-_multi_core/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_397 maybe it's just the individual results, as there is where the right thinks.
  15. 50 hardware in season too many. But it can cause people to get old, hardware and overclock the fact that they still do not have available in hardware the library . Thereby increasing the popularity of a particular iron. But I for number of results 30.
×
×
  • Create New...