alexmaj467
-
Posts
117 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by alexmaj467
-
-
Thanks. I do not know the benefits, I immediately changed the BIOS and did not try to use the native BIOS .
I guess I did it because of better function Load-Line Calibration
-
Thanks. one of the eight went so well, he needs a SS. Would have been almost everywhere first.
china,5603B171(2L604057)A1377
-
7 hours ago, GeorgeStorm said:
Clearly some kind of bug I'll try to look into it/get it looked into.
The calculation of points is correct.
Just these results somehow so considered, the rest of which I counted more than 80 processors correctly raschitany.
-
Sorry about my English .
I found a bug in the scoring system. I did recalculation of the results GEEKBENCH3 - SINGLE CORE and noticed that if the gap from the first place and the last is more than 25% then this last result gives not 0.2 points but much more.
look at the first and last result.
https://hwbot.org/benchmark/geekbench3_-_single_core/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_1491
https://hwbot.org/benchmark/geekbench3_-_single_core/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_550
https://hwbot.org/benchmark/geekbench3_-_single_core/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_921
https://hwbot.org/benchmark/geekbench3_-_single_core/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_1316
GEEKBENCH4 - MULTI CORE
https://hwbot.org/benchmark/geekbench4_-_multi_core/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_301
https://hwbot.org/benchmark/geekbench4_-_multi_core/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_397
maybe it's just the individual results, as there is where the right thinks.
-
50 hardware in season too many. But it can cause people to get old, hardware and overclock the fact that they still do not have available in hardware the library . Thereby increasing the popularity of a particular iron.
But I for number of results 30.
-
Sorry for my English.
Comrades , the Number of global points for the season interesting for those who uses the top iron and the cooling Nitrogen. I is the number of no matter though 5 results put. (decide among those who are on Global scores work).
10 Global per season Let it.
Global 20 for the season, let it be 20.
30 Global points let it be .
Those who do not receive Global points this number does not matter.
Leave those who use water or air cooling 30 Hardware results per season .
-
1
-
1
-
-
I can't get in more than 7 hours, on hwbot.
uat works perfectly.
-
2 hours ago, GeorgeStorm said:
Yup you can
thanks
I just forgot .
unlock new cores i need to specify the number and have the result be in another section.
And when i disable the processor cores , I submit the result to the category of how many physically there are cores in this model, without coming up with anything new.
-
Sorry my English.
I forgot if I can disable AMD cores for cpu-z , pifast and superpi feed.
My processor Athlon x2 7750BE above is overclocked if I disable the second core.
-
The screenshot shown is not A pcmark04 test, it is from another PCmark05 test
-
Sorry my English.
This is Google translate.I read this topic , where it was said that the use of version 130 build 1.0.0 is allowed, in which you can set the priority of the process in real time.
But the fact is that the use of real - time priority increases the result in the first three tests (Multithreaded test 1, Multithreaded test 2, Multithreaded test 3) almost twice and thus greatly differ the overall result from those who use build 1.1.0-1.3.0.
And this applies only to processors with one core. To get a high result on a processor with one core but two threads you need to disable HT.
I had to create this topic earlier before posting the results, but what's done is done.
Let's decide whether it is possible to use the build version 1.0.0, if not then I will have to redo all the results of 754 socket , 939 socket and 478 socket.
Perhaps those that I have posted with real time you can edit and disable them credit of points , they will as an example to calculate who will also use the 1.0.0 build.
For example, the result of which I have not yet laid out.My old result
My result at higher frequency, which has not yet been posted. Speed 4557MHz - build 1.0.0 - real-time priority = 8189 Marks
Speed 4557MHz - build 1.0.0 - high or normal priority = 6021 Marks
If you need to write a list of my results where I used the 1.0.0 build . so as not to waste time looking for them in my profile.
The file of the version of the program I used can also be found here.
-
The Google translator.
Let's find a program that accurately shows the bus and the multiplier for these systems, and add to the rules only for this socket that this program should be in the screenshot. And take the frequency of the final program is not CPU-Z and from another program. And from that time on, future results will only be checked for this socket.
-
And this edit in the screenshot you do not have AGP video card
-
21 hours ago, StingerYar said:
Stage 8 - Memory Frequency Dual channel
What about blank SPD pages, even with other versions of CPU-Z? The presence of SPD tab is mandatory (even if info is not readable), or you have to find different software that can read them correctly?
responded on your command forum.
You need to run the old version 1.78 without closing it to run the new version 1.83 or 1.86 and the new version will tab SPD with information..
-
1
-
1
-
-
Welcome to the team. Fix the result. you have one processor, not four at the same time on your motherboard .
-
CPU-Z versions after 1.80 do not display timings correctly and may not display the SPD tab on INTEL systems.
What about that ?
-
1
-
-
30 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:
Nope each member one score, you can submit 3, but only the best score will count...
I understood.
-
Question.
Three results on different (processor, video card, RAM ) can be from one team member or only from three ?
-
1
-
-
The condensation is formed before I turn on the air conditioner in the room. It's summer, in the morning the room temperature is 25 Celsius, by 10 o'clock in the morning the sun shines through the window, and at this point in the room 32 degrees Celsius. At the time when the room temperature is from 30 to 33 and the condensate is formed. At this point, I turn on the air conditioner, and the condensate is not formed.
-
Cooling water how many degrees? This is a normal water tap in the kitchen +15 degrees Celsius. No special cooling I do not use.
In the frequency test shows the temperature perfectly http://valid.x86.fr/px5jqz +29 Celsius
Maybe you don't understand how I got the result in the first two tests (Multithreaded test 1 - test 2 ) ? Pass these tests in real time is not prohibited . And to pass the third test (multithreaded test 3 ) I use the code.
@ECHO OFF
WMIC process where name="PCMark04.exe" CALL setpriority "256"
Sleep 70 //// Selected at random depends on each CPU and the frequency from 5 to 500.////
WMIC process where name="PCMark04.exe" CALL setpriority "128"
EXIT -
-
-
Thanks. I have a good processor caught, for ordinary water supply..?
-
Not bad. Will be Pifast and SuperPi ? I will not return, the water is too warm in the tap, maybe in the winter again will get the 754 socket, will have more CPUs per year.
alexmaj467 - GeForce2 MX200 @ 270/250MHz - 2674 marks 3DMark2001 SE
in Result Discussions
Posted
Thanks. A good memory, on an Intel platform would be much better.