Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

alexmaj467

Members
  • Posts

    117
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by alexmaj467

  1. I for a full-screen start approximately so.

     

    Code for Pifast.bat

    @echo off
    SetLocal EnableExtensions EnableDelayedExpansion
    IF "%~1"=="max" (
      SET params=%*
      start "Name of the Batch" /MAX %0 !params:~4!
      EXIT /B
    )
    ECHO new params: %*
    pause
    launcher pifast41.exe  hexus.txt

    Code for RUN_Pifast.bat

    @echo off
    Pifast.bat max

     

  2. Sorry for my English.

     

    Full document in pdf format in Russian and a little English here.

     

     

    Vmem mod part 1.

    20 or 50 kOm VR  solder between 6 and 4 pins, LM358 operational amplifier. To chenge the voltage from 2.85v to 3.2v.

    Before you do, measure the resistance between the pin. After solder a resistor trimmers, put the value close to what it was before all the action and only then turn on .reducing the resistance you increase the voltage. 

    IMG_0490_cr.thumb.png.24ee2f23a45e50c39572d6c317f9d9db.png

     

    IMG_0479_cr.png.b19878487874293370572cc6d1983dbe.png

    1IMG_9873_cr.thumb.jpg.eccda2d040e801ebf246cf2878aa75b1.jpg

    Vmem mod part 2.

    Change the memory power from the 3.3 volt on the 5 volt supply for the memory chips are Winbond BH5 and others.

    The control of the increase of the voltage will be the same resistor from part 1 .

    IMG_0497_cr.thumb.jpg.4a57a0fb8558c1e2d61dd6fbf8b5214b.jpg

     

    IMG_0501_cr.thumb.jpg.e710ff46491db70444c323f5246befe0.jpg

     

    • Thanks 1
  3. Well even with this minimum points feature, the problem of "stealing" points for anyone else once you upload your 130% score is still there. I think people will find this very demotivating.

    I voted against this as it solves nothing. Being 4th place in ranking of 20, worth 0,2 pts because the man 1st did something super spectacular still feels bad.

    Complete agreement.

    Too bad we can't re-vote.

     

    It would be better not formulas wrote and the fact that all who have 0 points get 0.2. This was clearer.

     

    I am for a solution to the problem but not this way , some hardware does not require the solution,other of a part requires.

  4. Sorry for my English. But I see the problem now on the other side. With the expectation that none of the processors in which the maximum acceleration of the ceiling does not exceed 10 - 70%. s 939 - s754 - s1155 non-K ...... The problem with those processors who are over 80% and 200% of the nominal value. You can make 2 formulas ? for the ones who are poorly looking to acceleration what we have now and for others to access a greater percentage of 25% ? If it is possible that we will collect a list of those processors which require changes to the calculation formula.

     

    will not work one formula is valid when the ceiling of dispersal among different processor families. Plus results 0 points replace 0.1

     

    No problem

    Athlon (Venice, s939)

    Athlon (Newcastle, s754)

    Celeron (Willamette 478)

    Core i5 2400

    Core i5 4690K

     

    problem

    Celeron D 336 (2,80GHz, s775)

    Celeron D 325J (2,533GHz, s775)

    Celeron D 347 775

    Athlon II X2 250

    Phenom II X2 555 BE

  5. 462 socket do not want to see this year.

     

     

    370s

     

    1. highest CPU frequency possible (percentage OC) - (Only use processors s370 Coppermine Celeron)

    2. Wprime32 - (Only use processors s370 Coppermine no CoppermineT, 2xCPU allowed)

    3. SuperPI 1m - (Only use processors s370 CeleronTualatin)

    4. Motherboard Reference Frequency or Memory Frequency.

     

    to be continued.....................................................

×
×
  • Create New...