slamms

Who benched on old BIOS? Now i see that they found decision for this clock/dram, but i think it doesn`t for really. I am sure that it was sharing. Thank you all guys who support me.

i give you right Super Pi version What about HW sharing? You really think that it was different setup`s? And who received this DRAM freq? You or HiCookie?

HKEPC can change BCLK on Gigabyte with NDA software, but i found another fantastic thing. Also i am benching 5 years, but never seen 2 sec in Super Pi 32M. Massman, can you repeat?

If i right understand that SSC spectrum not available in BIOS. And change it may only with special NDA software, right? If yes, explain me why need use it?

Also please can do screen what is SSC Spectrum? I dont know about it and we cant see/find it in BIOS.

Please kindly explain why need change SSC Spectrum for extreme overclocking?

Please compare submitted results date and publication for latest GTL (your version).

Massman, we are waiting official decision. Please use first small "s" for my nickname.

Friends, wait, the decision is pending.

Nice pics!!! rbuass, with you overclocking in Brazil going on new level!

same as who? or same BIOS as on ASUS LOL

Yes, and I gave it up

Thanks mate!

I showed that John Lam and Mad 222 was shared results in Super Pi 32M, but hwbot crew not see facts why crew don't must believe HKEPC` words. I am ready to prove that John Lam is liar. He is deceives to vendors and thus all true overclocking community. http://hwbot.org/submission/2303028_hkepc_wprime_32m_core_i7_3770k_3sec_484ms'>http://hwbot.org/submission/2303028_hkepc_wprime_32m_core_i7_3770k_3sec_484ms This results was done on Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H by John Lam. I think it`s good way for report/feedback for Gigabyte. BUT! It not was Gigabyte motherboard. All Gigabyte motherboards can`t set 1206.8 Mhz for DRAM. Please lets check: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H. BCLK 109.6 MHz (really 109.63 MHz) BCLK 109.7 Mhz (really 109.71 Mhz) BCLK 109.8 Mhz (really 109.79 MHz) Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UP5H BCLK 109.7 MHz BCLK 109.8 MHz Who knows how to receive 1206.8 MHz on DRAM. No need magic hand, need only ASUS motherboard. John Lam «benched for Gigabyte» on ASUS motherboard the 17th of July. Please check this results, which submitted the 17th of July. I am sure that it was ASUS motherboard too. http://hwbot.org/submission/2300691_hkepc_superpi_core_i7_3770k_5sec_297ms But why wPrime 32M score John Lam submitted only the 27th of July? http://hwbot.org/submission/2303028_hkepc_wprime_32m_core_i7_3770k_3sec_484ms Because Mad222 submitted wPrime 32M the 17th of July. http://hwbot.org/submission/2300673_mad222_wprime_32m_core_i7_3770k_3sec_468ms I dont see screen by Mad222 for wPime 32M, but sure that John Lam submitted previous result, which was received by Mad222. I think that was same situation as in wPrime 1024M. Previous result, which Mad222 received the 17th of July, was submitted by John Lam the 27th of July. http://hwbot.org/submission/2292932_mad222_wprime_1024m_core_i7_3770k_110sec_281ms'>http://hwbot.org/submission/2292932_mad222_wprime_1024m_core_i7_3770k_110sec_281ms John Lam showed it as Gigabyte motherboard but higher i am explain why it was ASUS motherboard. This results was posted by John Lam, because Mad222 received better score. And submitted best score the 17th of July. And show us which was a really motherboard. http://hwbot.org/submission/2292932_mad222_wprime_1024m_core_i7_3770k_110sec_281ms I think it`s enough.

Marc, Because I'm starting a witch hunt

HWBot crew is back from Berlin and we are waiting decision. If need any facts for confirmation that John Lam is liar, i can show more.

We must talk about sharing now.

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?282579-Benching-party-with-Hicookie-HKEPC-OC-Lab Mad222 explain in this thread why we see simular screens. Christyan Ney, i glad that HKEPC has more than 5 7GHz chip, but it does not give them the right for sharing results.

We know about access to multiple chips, but dont understand why they shared results.

Ok, please tell me how your photo explain that you dont shared results from one setup? If this picture OK for HWBot crew, please change rules. Must be write, if you live in different country and sent results on email another, you must be banned. But if you bench together, you can send results on usb flash drive without ban. HWBot crew, will ne any comments about this incident with HKEPC?

John Lam, thank you for your real face.

Mad222, Was 2 different CPU`s, 2 different DRAM kits, 2 different MB`s, 2 different SSD and 1 OS image, right?

Yes, I am from Russia too, but it's not meant for this topic.

for those who are not sure that this is one system: first result from Mad222 18 Aug: Super Pi 1M: After it was run Super Pi 32M, but was submitted 20 Aug by John Lam: Please double check shortcut on screens: And after it was run Super Pi 32M, which submitted 19 Aug by Mad222. Run with MaxMem, CopyWaza, Language bar. Can you explain me, why was disabled MaxMem, CopyWaza and Language bar for John Lam results, if it was on next day? Or John Lam dont know than with this tweaks results will be better?

Guys, please stop.