-
Posts
2012 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by ObscureParadox_3XS
-
-
giving the rest of us at least some chance would be nice
-
D9WFN or M perhaps?
-
oh really? Seems a bit odd for micron to use a competitors IC instead of their own.
-
1 hour ago, mickulty said:
Wow, good spot - the spd tab reports it as micron!
EDIT: As does the comment on the score, I'm blind lol
As does the fact he's put a picture of the Ballistix in the submission
-
1
-
-
Only thing I can imagine is that there might have been a dodgy voltage going through the PCI-E lane on that card which fed back to the CPU and killed the board etc. Seems really strange and quite unlucky though
-
1 hour ago, Splave said:
I killed 1 MOCF and 1 PG9 mobo and 1 9900K with these cards so im out
have fun guys.
How in the fuck did you manage that?
-
1
-
-
Just curious with the ram speed and timings etc, was 1:2 ratio not possible with that FSB?
-
6 minutes ago, Noxinite said:
Yup, PSC.
Hopefully got a few litres left to try some more today.
Just slow down a little and give us old timers a chance
-
Unreal efficiency sir, great score! :)
-
1
-
-
Which cooler are you using then? 90+ without any overclocking is pretty high, somethings not quite right here. Can you maybe take a picture of your rig for us?
-
he means the score needs to be shown as "valid" on the 3dmark site, i.e. we need to follow their rules also, so no tesselation modification.
-
To be fair, when the new OpenCL came out for GPU-Pi, we didn't remove all old scores back then or create a seperate ranking, we just accepted that it was part of the benchmark and got on with it.
I also don't know how you'll go about moderating the XTU scores if you have two seperate rankings considering it's the most popular benchmark by far. Unless the submission system can detect which version has been used and therefor always put you in the right catagory by default, I see XTU being completely unmanigable thereafter. -
it's not an important piece of information for a memory benchmark result so I wouldn't worry about it too much
-
15 hours ago, poparamiro said:
The problem is only in gt2 and gt3, about 100 fps less in single card.
That explains so much...... I thought I was going crazy
-
1
-
-
Time to get some LN2 on this bad boy and truly max it out I think :D
-
2 hours ago, TerraRaptor said:
Thanks.
Another question - cpuz calculates the mem frequency wrong way (just +33MHz to fsb, not +PCI as it should be). Should we use this wrong value or refer to the value from setfsb/cpufsb? I.e. 150Mhz fsb +PCI (strap 100 - so mem is actually 200MHz but 183MHz in cpuz) is higher than 185MHz 1:1 - but if we rely on cpuz, the winner will be 185 1:1.
Although I highly doubt anything will be done about it, it might be worth sending the files through to the CPU-Z developers as I imagine there will be a new revision out shortly anyway with the new AMD CPUs on the horizon.
-
25 minutes ago, Seal2fast said:
I can go!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sorry sir, but the invite was specifically for Seal3fast
-
It might be interesting to have the Div 6 and 7 limitations be 4GHz for CPU (to give Ryzen users a chance) but then no limitations on the GPU, would make for an intersting battle that would be more GPU based limit than CPU. Although I would understand if having sub zero temps on the GPU would go against the ethos of those divisions.
-
I think we all know how poor AMD sensors work at low temperatures compared to high temps so I know for a fact the temperature will be fine. But just to cover yourself why not just up the temperature by around 2-3c to ensure that the sensor won't bug below 0c, your CPU should easily do those clocks with only 2c more.
-
On 4/3/2019 at 8:55 PM, yosarianilives said:
Seems I may have a lead on which card is the best, any that has a memory layout that would support swapping with desktop binned memory. AFAIK it's none of them but I'm sure our super sleuths can find it
You also need to hope that the memory controller can deal with high MHz etc, but yeah I had a similar idea to you and have practiced removing chips on a dead card
Although not too successfully might I add....
-
10 minutes ago, DR4G00N said:
Why are Intel chipset's not allowed though? Is there some specific reason for it?
Why win the board you're already competing with? + It's a nice change and adds a new challenge. I like the fact it won't just be the standard TUSL2-C boards etc
May the best chipset win!
-
1
-
1
-
-
Very strong, nice score
-
11 hours ago, TaPaKaH said:
added yet another Rampage Extreme
I know this is not a discussion thread, but have you tested to make sure that the E6750 isn't faulty?
-
4 minutes ago, GeorgeStorm said:
Yeah my bad guys, not ready to go yet, hopefully will have time tonight to finish.
No worries sir, no rush
NeedMoreBeer99 - Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 4950MHz - 9min 47sec 891ms SuperPi - 32M
in Result Discussions
Posted
Brexit OS anyone?