Jump to content

Antinomy

Crew
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Antinomy

  1. I would like to up this thread. In addition to the hardware class browsing it would be nice to make a search not only by exact CPU, but CPU class - P54C, Willamette, Thunderbird or even a socket class - Slot A, Slot 1, socket 478, socket 7. Or a combination of these. I think the way the Intel's processorfinder works - a way like that. But with the ability to be able to switch to the whole class. For example, Intel procfinder can show the E5000/6000 the E7000/8000 but can't show all them in a single list (because for Intel these are separate product line, though we now it's all Wolfdales). And another one - the new submissions button. For example, I've examined all Geforce 6 results and I'm aiming to certain places in a couple of categories. So I'd like to see - what submissions were in Geforce 6 class in last week, month, three months. Thank you
  2. Oh, I tested before the TX97-XE and yesterday checked the TX97-E. Looks like some boards are not associated with their chipsets.
  3. Thank you, the chipset/mobo ranking are now fine What about the rest?
  4. It's even DIN! I have a favourite old DIN KB too But I prefer to use KVM for testing purpose.
  5. :ws: Brilliant one, doc!
  6. I was browsing the chipset and motherboard pages and found that the info is shown incorrectly. I mean the records done using the selected hardware. For example, we go to the P3B-F page: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/p3b_f?tab=info I see that the board earned a number of cups but I can't search them because the results are stacked by the result in each benchmark - not the place or boints. It's obviously that a crappy P3-800 will rip an outstanding P2 result so why should it be shown before? And it would be better to view the cups and medals - when you look within one CPU/GPU category, it's easy to understand which results are in top5. But when it comes to MoBo ranking... And yes, there's a chipset ranking bug. http://hwbot.org/hardware/chipset/430tx_ - we look the 430TX chipset and see a board with cups, the http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/tx97_xe Let's look it's results: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/tx97_xe?tab=2drankings#/manufacturer.rankings.do?applicationId=3&manufacturer=&hardwareTypeId=MBMODEL_5414&hardwareType=MBMODEL&tabid=cpubenchmarks We can see a single result. Then we switch to 430TX ranking and what do wee see? Two results, but the one that was done with TX97-XE is gone And yes, no idea about the place of the result in it's hardware category.
  7. Thank you yes, you got me right - the don't have one certain nationality, but the region can be specified.
  8. Anyway, I'm a crappy newsmaker, so this one is not for me. But what about adding MXS to USSR region?
  9. thanks for the link, but the damn customs won't share my enthusiasm. This will reveal a problem - some will wan't news in Russian, but as they appear, there will be a mess when you've read some in Russian (for example) and you want to read all of them in the international but don't want to reread the ones that were translated. At least it's my opinion. So there should be a way to manage the translated news not to mess with the unique ones and not to double the original ones. A good solution is not to translate news but some may not agree with me.
  10. That's interesting news! I hope you mean that they will have additional news etc. or we will have to switch from local to global to see the whole picture? A-ha-ha! Frederick, your sense of humor is great. "Gain control over the region or a nation" - now that sounds! LOL If only I knew what that means (assuming I got you meaned the region local website, not the region itself).
  11. Today I've opened the main page and was surprised by three link - the international, romanian and USSR one. What I don't get is what about the ru.hwbot.org - it is working though no link is published. So the question is - will there be a separation by nationalities or by regions or by languages? I don't see any use of the Russian one when there is the USSR local version. What I mean is that the current number and implementation confuses me and I want to clear out the question. And yes, how about making MXS belonging to the USSR ranking? Like some members (TiN for example) who has a custom flag, but belongs to Ukraine rating. MXS didn't select a country because they have members both from Russia and Ukraine (and two captains for the same reason) but USSR - is what can unite both their member's countries. Of course, if they don't mind And yes, the idea of USSR ranking and region is a great one (did I say that before?). Nostalgia, you know.
  12. OMFG, I have about 2 or 2.5 times less than Berserker. Now I know what thread I'll show to my friends and girlfriend next time they tell me I have too much hardware
  13. It's not the only one. T've met this bug earlier. Wish I could remeber the categories. Can look through again if it's vital. http://hwbot.org/rankings/worldrecords - another bug. The 3DMark Vantage places - the #3 score has 54641 points and #4 - 55478. But the global ranking shows everything correct including HWboints received. The problem is only with the record page.
  14. I know that not the finest way when you want to see the list.
  15. Ticket ID: 874 Priority: Low http://hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=141\r\n\r\nshows Carman or anyway this guy is named (don\'t know) \r\nWould like to see the results category though.
  16. In 5850 read the rules accurately - this issue has been discussed even there. And the number of shader processors corresponds to 5850 anyway.
  17. It's always a "convenience vs how much complicated it is" issue. Why not making a motherboard division - obviously the X48 board will rip an epic 975X? The answer is - this will make the rankings too complicated without need. The same for I-rams and videocards in PCMark. And yes, try to take a E5200 with a wall around 300-320 and find out how much is DDR3 better
  18. OTOH, stepping is much more universal and easier. Add this one at least.
  19. http://hwbot.org/community/team/o.t.h__overclock_team_holland_?tab=members - you are in this team, number 29. Is there really a problem? Go to the translation page, find the bug in the local file and send it back
  20. http://hwbot.org/competition/hoc_jan10 This competition was between This competition is between members. This competition is between members . You can see a syntax bug here. The string competition_competition.was.between.title add to competition_competition.is.between.title not replaces it. And the next sentence has an extra space before the dot - delete it.
  21. There is a local mirror here: http://ru.hwbot.org The headline under the logo is awful, but that's not the point now. Can you please make an flag icon linking to that mirror and disable the language detection on the main site version? I want my almost native English language back I've found a couple of mistakes in English, but accidently. I can't browse all HWBot via Google Translator in order to fiddle with the detection - it's a bit inconvinient work around.
  22. I suggest stepping too it's much easier to find it out but it can help when making a search browse.
  23. Well, what I did get out of these - http://futuremark.yougamers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=117706 http://futuremark.yougamers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=123839 is that the latest info patch (hotfix) should be installed - this may be an issue.
  24. I think it's a bit bugged ))))