Antinomy

I was browsing the chipset and motherboard pages and found that the info is shown incorrectly. I mean the records done using the selected hardware. For example, we go to the P3B-F page: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/p3b_f?tab=info I see that the board earned a number of cups but I can't search them because the results are stacked by the result in each benchmark - not the place or boints. It's obviously that a crappy P3-800 will rip an outstanding P2 result so why should it be shown before? And it would be better to view the cups and medals - when you look within one CPU/GPU category, it's easy to understand which results are in top5. But when it comes to MoBo ranking... And yes, there's a chipset ranking bug. http://hwbot.org/hardware/chipset/430tx_ - we look the 430TX chipset and see a board with cups, the http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/tx97_xe Let's look it's results: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/tx97_xe?tab=2drankings#/manufacturer.rankings.do?applicationId=3&manufacturer=&hardwareTypeId=MBMODEL_5414&hardwareType=MBMODEL&tabid=cpubenchmarks We can see a single result. Then we switch to 430TX ranking and what do wee see? Two results, but the one that was done with TX97-XE is gone And yes, no idea about the place of the result in it's hardware category.

Thank you yes, you got me right - the don't have one certain nationality, but the region can be specified.

Anyway, I'm a crappy newsmaker, so this one is not for me. But what about adding MXS to USSR region?

thanks for the link, but the damn customs won't share my enthusiasm. This will reveal a problem - some will wan't news in Russian, but as they appear, there will be a mess when you've read some in Russian (for example) and you want to read all of them in the international but don't want to reread the ones that were translated. At least it's my opinion. So there should be a way to manage the translated news not to mess with the unique ones and not to double the original ones. A good solution is not to translate news but some may not agree with me.

That's interesting news! I hope you mean that they will have additional news etc. or we will have to switch from local to global to see the whole picture? A-ha-ha! Frederick, your sense of humor is great. "Gain control over the region or a nation" - now that sounds! LOL If only I knew what that means (assuming I got you meaned the region local website, not the region itself).

Today I've opened the main page and was surprised by three link - the international, romanian and USSR one. What I don't get is what about the ru.hwbot.org - it is working though no link is published. So the question is - will there be a separation by nationalities or by regions or by languages? I don't see any use of the Russian one when there is the USSR local version. What I mean is that the current number and implementation confuses me and I want to clear out the question. And yes, how about making MXS belonging to the USSR ranking? Like some members (TiN for example) who has a custom flag, but belongs to Ukraine rating. MXS didn't select a country because they have members both from Russia and Ukraine (and two captains for the same reason) but USSR - is what can unite both their member's countries. Of course, if they don't mind And yes, the idea of USSR ranking and region is a great one (did I say that before?). Nostalgia, you know.

OMFG, I have about 2 or 2.5 times less than Berserker. Now I know what thread I'll show to my friends and girlfriend next time they tell me I have too much hardware

It's not the only one. T've met this bug earlier. Wish I could remeber the categories. Can look through again if it's vital. http://hwbot.org/rankings/worldrecords - another bug. The 3DMark Vantage places - the #3 score has 54641 points and #4 - 55478. But the global ranking shows everything correct including HWboints received. The problem is only with the record page.

I know that not the finest way when you want to see the list.

Ticket ID: 874 Priority: Low http://hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=141\r\n\r\nshows Carman or anyway this guy is named (don\'t know) \r\nWould like to see the results category though.

In 5850 read the rules accurately - this issue has been discussed even there. And the number of shader processors corresponds to 5850 anyway.

It's always a "convenience vs how much complicated it is" issue. Why not making a motherboard division - obviously the X48 board will rip an epic 975X? The answer is - this will make the rankings too complicated without need. The same for I-rams and videocards in PCMark. And yes, try to take a E5200 with a wall around 300-320 and find out how much is DDR3 better

OTOH, stepping is much more universal and easier. Add this one at least.

http://hwbot.org/community/team/o.t.h__overclock_team_holland_?tab=members - you are in this team, number 29. Is there really a problem? Go to the translation page, find the bug in the local file and send it back

http://hwbot.org/competition/hoc_jan10 This competition was between This competition is between members. This competition is between members . You can see a syntax bug here. The string competition_competition.was.between.title add to competition_competition.is.between.title not replaces it. And the next sentence has an extra space before the dot - delete it.

There is a local mirror here: http://ru.hwbot.org The headline under the logo is awful, but that's not the point now. Can you please make an flag icon linking to that mirror and disable the language detection on the main site version? I want my almost native English language back I've found a couple of mistakes in English, but accidently. I can't browse all HWBot via Google Translator in order to fiddle with the detection - it's a bit inconvinient work around.

I suggest stepping too it's much easier to find it out but it can help when making a search browse.

Well, what I did get out of these - http://futuremark.yougamers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=117706 http://futuremark.yougamers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=123839 is that the latest info patch (hotfix) should be installed - this may be an issue.

I think it's a bit bugged ))))

Yeah, I couldn't submit my validated 65k in 3DMark03 on 6150SE either But I have a clue why

I've must missed something - can you show were exactly I suggested to add a new feature, not related to content adding (read - text), but coding/feature adding? I didn't mean to make any coding. Though, the donate button works, so I should start seeking for Paypal transfer capabity

I mean similar article about the family or model introduction, pre-production facts and capabilities. For example, I don't see such a thing here: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce4_ti_4200_8x http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/rage_128_pro Just got these two first, don't think there's much besides them. The CPUs can be described too. And I don't understand the thing about checking the hardware specs or reorganizing some subfamilies to require a budget if I could make a full list what has to be fixed. Just click all pages and check for mistakes. For a small example - what is a Celeron doing here: http://hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=128 Or why is the 486 family showing a "crap" error? Or I missed something and these mistaked require manufacturer support in some indirect way?

Em, I'm not sure my e-mail wasn't added by RB to the black list So I'll repeat some Make a hardware database with a more full info, like this one: http://hwbot.org/article/news/gpu_1088 but make it for else categories (can make a community work - don't need to write by yourself). By this you will have maybe the biggest database about hardware specs, not only the performance. Yet again, the hardware specs that are presented should be cleaned - some have wrong description (core name, CPU names etc.). And I suggest some categories or I think better to call them "subfamilies" should be sorted - quite a mess in some of them. Do you need a list or ?

Why did the country page dissapear?

You were a bit inattentive this means Thuban support, I'm sure you know, just have missed that line.