Antinomy
-
Posts
1987 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
53
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Antinomy
-
-
thanks for the link, but the damn customs won't share my enthusiasm.This will reveal a problem - some will wan't news in Russian, but as they appear, there will be a mess when you've read some in Russian (for example) and you want to read all of them in the international but don't want to reread the ones that were translated.
At least it's my opinion. So there should be a way to manage the translated news not to mess with the unique ones and not to double the original ones. A good solution is not to translate news
but some may not agree with me. -
That's interesting news! I hope you mean that they will have additional news etc. or we will have to switch from local to global to see the whole picture?The links in the top right corner are domains which in the short future will be maintained by regional partners, not ourself. With maintained we mean they provide news, competitions, moderation, advertisement, etc.
A-ha-ha! Frederick, your sense of humor is great. "Gain control over the region or a nation" - now that sounds!If you want to gain control over a region or nation, drop us a mail @ info@hwbot.org
LOLIf only I knew what that means (assuming I got you meaned the region local website, not the region itself).
-
Today I've opened the main page and was surprised by three link - the international, romanian and USSR one. What I don't get is what about the ru.hwbot.org - it is working though no link is published. So the question is - will there be a separation by nationalities or by regions or by languages? I don't see any use of the Russian one when there is the USSR local version.
What I mean is that the current number and implementation confuses me and I want to clear out the question.
And yes, how about making MXS belonging to the USSR ranking? Like some members (TiN for example) who has a custom flag, but belongs to Ukraine rating. MXS didn't select a country because they have members both from Russia and Ukraine (and two captains for the same reason) but USSR - is what can unite both their member's countries.
Of course, if they don't mind
And yes, the idea of USSR ranking and region is a great one (did I say that before?). Nostalgia, you know.
-
OMFG, I have about 2 or 2.5 times less than Berserker. Now I know what thread I'll show to my friends and girlfriend next time they tell me I have too much hardware
-
It's not the only one. T've met this bug earlier. Wish I could remeber the categories. Can look through again if it's vital.
http://hwbot.org/rankings/worldrecords - another bug. The 3DMark Vantage places - the #3 score has 54641 points and #4 - 55478. But the global ranking shows everything correct including HWboints received. The problem is only with the record page.
-
I know that
not the finest way when you want to see the list. -
Ticket ID: 874
Priority: Low
http://hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=141\r\n\r\nshows Carman or anyway this guy is named (don\'t know)
\r\nWould like to see the results category though. -
In 5850
read the rules accurately - this issue has been discussed even there.And the number of shader processors corresponds to 5850 anyway.
-
because my epic good d9gkx cant compete with bad bbse, let alone hyper's.
It's always a "convenience vs how much complicated it is" issue.
Why not making a motherboard division - obviously the X48 board will rip an epic 975X? The answer is - this will make the rankings too complicated without need.
The same for I-rams and videocards in PCMark.
And yes, try to take a E5200 with a wall around 300-320 and find out how much is DDR3 better
-
OTOH, stepping is much more universal
and easier. Add this one at least. -
http://hwbot.org/community/team/o.t.h__overclock_team_holland_?tab=members - you are in this team, number 29. Is there really a problem?
Go to the translation page, find the bug in the local file and send it back
-
http://hwbot.org/competition/hoc_jan10
This competition was between This competition is between members. This competition is between members .
You can see a syntax bug here. The string competition_competition.was.between.title add to competition_competition.is.between.title not replaces it. And the next sentence has an extra space before the dot - delete it.
-
There is a local mirror here: http://ru.hwbot.org
The headline under the logo is awful, but that's not the point now. Can you please make an flag icon linking to that mirror and disable the language detection on the main site version? I want my almost native English language back
I've found a couple of mistakes in English, but accidently. I can't browse all HWBot via Google Translator in order to fiddle with the detection - it's a bit inconvinient work around.
-
I suggest stepping too
it's much easier to find it out but it can help when making a search browse. -
Well, what I did get out of these - http://futuremark.yougamers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=117706
http://futuremark.yougamers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=123839
is that the latest info patch (hotfix) should be installed - this may be an issue.
-
I think it's a bit bugged ))))
-
Yeah, I couldn't submit my validated 65k in 3DMark03 on 6150SE either
But I have a clue why
-
I've must missed something - can you show were exactly I suggested to add a new feature, not related to content adding (read - text), but coding/feature adding?
I didn't mean to make any coding. Though, the donate button works, so I should start seeking for Paypal transfer capabity
-
I mean similar article about the family or model introduction, pre-production facts and capabilities. For example, I don't see such a thing here: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce4_ti_4200_8x
http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/rage_128_pro
Just got these two first, don't think there's much besides them. The CPUs can be described too.
And I don't understand the thing about checking the hardware specs or reorganizing some subfamilies to require a budget if I could make a full list what has to be fixed. Just click all pages and check for mistakes.
For a small example - what is a Celeron doing here: http://hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=128
Or why is the 486 family showing a "crap" error?
Or I missed something and these mistaked require manufacturer support in some indirect way?
-
Em, I'm not sure my e-mail wasn't added by RB to the black list
So I'll repeat some
Make a hardware database with a more full info, like this one: http://hwbot.org/article/news/gpu_1088 but make it for else categories (can make a community work - don't need to write by yourself). By this you will have maybe the biggest database about hardware specs, not only the performance.
Yet again, the hardware specs that are presented should be cleaned - some have wrong description (core name, CPU names etc.).
And I suggest some categories or I think better to call them "subfamilies" should be sorted - quite a mess in some of them.
Do you need a list or
?you reply to every suggestion "not possible", "bad idea" or "no time"
-
Why did the country page dissapear?
-
You were a bit inattentiveI guess there's no Thuban microcode inserted into that bios yet. 31.5x is, by the way, the maximum useable multiplier for Phenom-II. I've seen some manufacturers add higher multipliers in the bios, but that's just wasting space.
this means Thuban support, I'm sure you know, just have missed that line.enable or disable Core Performance Boost -
I've checked in Biostar TA890GXE BIOS - http://www.biostar.com.tw/app/en/mb/bios.php?S_ID=474
It shows the ability to
enable or disable Core Performance Boost
Disable CPU cores
Activate disabled cores (BIO-unlocKING) - which for now, seems, only is able to unlock third and forth cores only - not for Thuban.
The max multiplier in Biostar is 31.5x. More than enough, though
Massman, as for the ECC - AMD had this one for ages - since the presentation of AMD Hammer family
it's just hidden in BIOS until you plug in a ECC memory stick I wanted to clear this as the are newsmakers beginning to reprint your words
-
Yes, I've seen the info on Asus - I just wanted to check another headline manufacturer.
The idea on eight cores is unification - for the quad core we had to make a two bit machineID (haven't read the BIOS developers guide for ages so I quote as I remember it). When we go to six cores, we have to change the routine. So if we implement a three-bit, why not make an eight core? Anyway it will come out, so no double job. That's my idea.
What can be said - this is obviously nothing to deal with server CPUs - already 12 cores there. Think it's for future desktop, lower tech. process for sure.
Local pages confusion and USSR suggestion
in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions
Posted
Anyway, I'm a crappy newsmaker, so this one is not for me.
But what about adding MXS to USSR region?