Turrican

siehe hier, letzter satz (see here, last sentence) http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=42071&postcount=2

i try it in german maybe he understand it better. his english isn't very good. @aerron das resultat wurde geblocked weil man die verwendete auflösung nicht sieht. vor dem screenshot machen das fenster mit der punktezahl beiseite schieben. gpu-z unterstützt keine sis karten, also am besten "everest" benutzen. da werden dann ein paar infos angzeigt.

i try it in german maybe he understand it better. his english isn't very good. @aerron man muss die gebenchte auflösung sehen. am besten vor dem screenshot machen das fenster mit der punktezahl etwas bei seite schieben, hast ja genug platz am desktop.

just click on the "book" symbol to see the reason. it has been blocked because the benched resolution isn't visible.

is has nothing to do with the rarenes of the card. gpu-z only recognizes amd/ati, nvidia, s3 and intel cards. i added it, so now you can change to that category http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/parhelia_avpe

yep, most of them differ in the fsb, HT and used core. those should of course be reported to be moved into the right category.

here we go p3 1.13ghz with 256kb l2 cache http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_3_1.133ghz_256kb_l2_cache p3 1.13ghz with 512kb l2 cache http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_3_1.133ghz_512kb_l2_cache

that will be a massacre

that will be a massacre

hi oki when you wrote the pm i was already in bed, sorry for the late reply

hmm. seems like some have 2 rops and therefore 4 pixel shaders and some 1 rop and only 2 pixel shaders.

ah, the memory infos has been already removed by someone.

i think it's because previously you submitted in the wrong category. your card is a PCI-E and you posted in the PCI category. there's a big difference in performance.

jeeez, crazy result

added http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/core_2_t4400_2.2ghz /edit:damn, jmke you were a bit faster. luckily there's only one t4400 category, i've "recycled" the 2nd one.

maybe it's because the newer 775 were named like p4 560 or p4 530 etc. just look into the 775 p4 category.

i think you meant socket 478. there's already a p4 3.2ghz prescott in the 775 and 478 category.

awesome result knut

lol

added http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_ii_x3_450

bruce seem to be crazy.

lol oxyyy is a user like you on this forums and just posted his loss. "maintenance bot" is just a user title, you btw. also have. like massman man said, RB is working on it so just have a bit patience. i also lost 140 points, because of this problem.

i've lost ~140 points. so i think something isn't right here. looks like only hardware points are affected by the "hickup"?

it's already there http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/gma_950_gm945_mobile