SolidStateAlchemy

Thanks @redux, this is some standout research in the field of overclocking. I do have some questions though, is there any way to "follow" a single dimm through all the tests? What I mean is if a dimm wound up in say the 90th percentile in on one test did it continue to remain in that cohort throughout all the tests?

this is the list of RDNA GPUs allowed (no Pro cards or mobile though) https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocards#key=rdna

Thank you for ending the comp before Christmas. I enjoyed the AMD GPU stage last year that specified AM3 socket motherboard. Wondering if we could see a 14nm AMD CPU/GPU stage (both CPU and GPU must be on 14 Nm). Kind of the OldZenRamvenge meets GPUs. Or AM4 socket with a Polaris 20 series GPU instead of the AMD iGPU. Could still use Night Raid

I'm an American and I'm on board with the Aussies here. I loathe the time period for CC comps. The only thing I want to do during the holidays is enjoy time with family and friends, not spend hours in my basement trying to get an ancient graphics card to come back to life. Long winter nights here in NA are a great time to OC, so I would prefer anytime from mid January to March.

Country cup had an HD 3000 and an HD 6000 stage, so HD 5000 would fill in the gap. US ebay has a ton of 5870s on it for reasonable prices.

If the goal is to have it layed over school breaks Dec-Jan makes more sense for CC. I personally despise timing of CC, because I would like to spend my holidays with my family, not locked away benching (my son felt the same way). Jan-Feb when there's naught else to do but long-winter bench sessions seems much better. I don't do TC, so no input there.

Has anyone else had issues getting a Geekbench browser account? I've tried signing up several times and never get the activation email (yes, I've checked the spam folder). I've even tried emailing primate labs support email, and never received a reply.

this score https://hwbot.org/submission/5114091_bavor_7_zip_ryzen_9_5950x_187508_mips should have knocked this score https://hwbot.org/submission/5111018_doomed83_7_zip_ryzen_9_5950x_160950_mips out of the 7zip team ranking. The total team score is correct, but keeping track of who has subbed what is pretty much impossible right now. Is this the scenario you mean when you say the coder is working on the average score listing?

Thank you for the clarification.

I think a lot of people understood that to mean core COUNT since 7zip is divided on its benchmark page by core count and not architecture. In many people's minds Core =/= Architecture.

ok, if scores are divided by 4 then that part checks out. I know Team USA has at least 3 subs for 7zip, but when you click on the teams score link it goes to the Georgamel's first ( and worst) sub and doesn't reflect top 4 scores.

Intel y-cruncher pi 1b seems to be correct, and averaging scores correctly, maybe copy the settings for that stage and apply them to the other stages?

Yeah, team scores are wrong, averages are wrong, still says everyone needs 3 more scores... it's just broken Specifically the 7zip stage

Is the scoring reflecting accurately? The 7zip and GB4 team scores/places don't seem accurate.