
klopcha
V.I.P.-
Posts
281 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by klopcha
-
Ticket ID: 646 Priority: Low Please add ATi Radeon X1600 64-bit DDR2\r\nhttp://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/n9by6/
-
It will soon be created a separate category My friend has the same graphics card
-
Ticket ID: 449 Priority: Low Please add http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=879504
-
Ticket ID: 415 Priority: Low Please add.\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=869676
-
More bug http://www.hwbot.org/browseHardwareVideoCards.do?gpuFamilyId=165 Category G31/G33 is not open ( Error 404) http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/GMA%20i946GZ http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/Sempron%203100_%20(Athlon%20XP) http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/Sempron%203100_%20(A64)%20Palermo Unable to "edit entry" and "edit modification log" for the results. This leads to new window with "No hardware found, please be more specific." thx
-
3dmark results "insufficient verification" updated
klopcha replied to TiMiN8R's topic in Submission & member moderation
Approved. ORB Link - this very good -
Ticket ID: 312 Priority: Low Screenshot - http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/a2ppa/\r\n\r\nAnd rename category \"GeForce 7300 LE 128 mb\" in \"GeForce 7300 LE 128 mb DDR2\"
-
Ticket ID: 203 Priority: Low Result: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=810317\r\nScreenshot: http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=182393&thumb=false\r\n\r\nAnd please rename category Radeon HD4650 in Radeon HD4650 DDR2
-
Hey, Turrican! You have forgotten our conversation? GM945 = GMA 950 (Mobile) Let's then rename GMA 950 (Mobile) in GMA 950 (GM945 Mobile)
-
Moderated.
-
You have incorrectly written the score benchmark. You write "305,718" , but need "305718". I have corrected.
-
There are rules. If I make an exception, there will be a precedent. Rules will lose force.
-
Gothrek: Read please Example verification screenshots http://hwbot.org/hwbot.post.do?postId=863 The decision is possible if is ORB Link. All in such conditions.
-
I carry out the duties. Results have been added after 12.05.08 and did not correspond to rules. If there is a message of a forum with your results with date till 12.05.08 or ORB Link, results will unblocked. Here there is no my error: 21 Sep 2008 02:06 insufficient verification (crew) klopcha 21 Sep 2008 02:56 modified Chiller 21 Sep 2008 03:45 checked (crew) jmke Why delete? If they do not correspond to rules they will be blocked.
-
Dan Jacques: I blocked some your results because they did not correspond to rules. Read please: http://www.hwbot.org/hwbot.post.do?postId=872 http://www.hwbot.org/hwbot.post.do?postId=863
-
Corrected, but you could correct too. Sorry for my bad English.
-
I have given you the reference to a site of the manufacturer. At you G965 (desktop chipset) i.e. X3000. At me GMA 965 (Notebook chipset), i.e. X3100.
-
Dear BUSTAMOVE. You have the Intel G965 Express Chipset motherboard with IntelĀ® Graphics Media Accelerator X3000. http://www.intel.com/cd/products/services/emea/eng/chipsets/299731.htm We hardware spec base has mistakes, example, GMA965=GMA X3100. Soon we shall correct them. We are currently looking for someone who is willing to manage the hardware specifications. Best regards.
-
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702100 Needs more proof http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702229 From what time Radeon 8500 has a thermode? http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702225 Needs more proof http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702227 Needs more proof
-
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=701697 The benchmark was not run using default settings New rules are necessary, changing Z buffer is received chit.
-
Make a photo as this http://www.topmods.net/nord/2xe6850-team!!!+.jpg And will not be problems.
-
cant find resolution this is pro version!!! http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=659724 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=659872 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=636713 - No user http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=691679 Result on GF6600 PCI-E, but category GF6600 AGP.
-
I agree. It do not agree. The Mark 2001 is dependent on videomemory (FX5200SE has 64-bit memory interface). The 03,05,06 Mark's is dependent on GPU Core. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627510 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=619487 Identical result,hardware,screenshot on 2 user http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626738 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626988 Almost same hardware, almost the same screenshots, but submited by 2 different users http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=626819 Screenshot is wrong (not informative screen) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=625567 Screenshot is wrong http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625535 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=638176 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=621976 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=621958 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632600 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626820 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626821 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626822 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625383 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625790 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625587 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622602 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638562 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622610 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629658 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629767 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629708 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629696 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622606 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629662 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629769 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629702 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609549 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666450 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693592 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593538 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632237 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567032 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627512 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626317'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626317 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626434 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570903 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570427 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570909 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628123 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=699169 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693341'>http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693341 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=698550 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689918 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=688689 ... http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=685355 .. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=688777 .. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=685286 ... http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693341 ... http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=645029 ... http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=649335 ... http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692772 .. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689836 ... http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666055'>http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666055 .. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=655866 .. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666055 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570894 The name of a videocard is not displayed http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643620 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643025 Result on GF4 Ti4200 x8, but category Radeon 9500. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625854 Real result 16.5 seconds http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680610 Real result 1695 Mhz http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621462 No link, no screenshot http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621463 No link, no screenshot http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622688 No link, no screenshot http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587758 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593540 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587757 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587760 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576003 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638563 The resolution is not visible http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643623 The resolution is not visible http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674762 The resolution is not visible http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570485 Invalid result http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567030 Link dead http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=582752 Link dead http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643056 Link dead http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=620141 Link dead http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607784 Link dead http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632183 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626317 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603195 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=587077 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=634079 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=615482 Similary http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633620 Link fake http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638951 Screenshot fake http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641422 Use not Super Pi 1.5 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641150 Use not Super Pi 1.5 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695508 Screenshot is bad. To a window of the Aquamark screenshots CPU-Z, GPU-Z are pasted. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=699563 Why the size of figures such big?