Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Sweet

Crew
  • Posts

    1958
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Posts posted by Sweet

  1. All right here,all very rich but 

    Can someone explain this to me? please. Speed 13230 mhz ?

     

    Edit 1: andddd.... https://hwbot.org/submission/5053282_dakotahwl_xtu_2.0_core_i9_11900k_5670_marks


    https://hwbot.org/submission/5055033_dakotahwl_xtu_2.0_core_i9_11900k_5747_marks

    This one is another wrong xtu 2.0

    https://hwbot.org/submission/5054407_106550167441572546115_xtu_2.0_core_i5_8400t_1801_marks

    Edit 2: something is wrong with xtu2.0

    Edit : Everybody want one?

     

  2. Speaking of: degrees of greed, high self-centeredness and unfair competition
    When a little honesty and transparent competition solves everything
    I feel that sometimes we overclockers are at the stake of the vanities
    come on guys a little sincerity and honesty makes us something transcendent.
    Here, the only one affected is the site (HWBot) that we all use for free for our macho vanity.
    Excuse my strong words but this must end

    I totally share and in all his words what was written by @shar00750

    Sweet dreams and good night my chichipios del tarro
    Ahh and I don't speak english well and I can't pay for the ln2, so what?

    Ps and I edit: "The real smart man is the one who looks like an asshole in front of an asshole who seems smart"

    • Like 4
  3. 6 minutes ago, der8auer said:

    Im with Tobias here. Same thing for 05, 06, Vantage, 11. All of them score lower in multi GPU than single GPU. 

    From HWBot perspective, any benchmark that requires extreme tweaking is bad for us. It puts high workload on the moderation team and is at the same time demotivating for people who want to step into overclocking. 

    That's why this is no option from my side.

    Roman shouldn't globals be added to other benchmarks to compensate for the loss of those globals ?

     

  4. 6 hours ago, Mr.Scott said:

    Only a month? You are more generous than I.

    In the good old days the silver hammer was applied, I think remember that...

    But my friends this case is not the only one as mentioned above.

    There are already at least two more reported cases and not only Splave, Bullshooter I think has been reported for the same reason in 3D01

    I think we should ask the big overclockers to stop doing this , and delete your incorrect 3d01

    Stop Now, please

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  5. Interesting, reminds me of excessive hacking in PcMark05 in old years..But this is not the case

    Imo: sustainability in the future of HWBot lies in scores and honest competition
    I don't know if 1 gpu or 2 gpus is better but I do know that there are many new guys who want to reach the top positions, as I once thought myself (and I didn't achieve it)
    So for me, many more benchmarks should have global ones and give new one the chance to see if they can get closer to the best.
    For the sake of sustainability, for this year, the global ones should be left to 3D01 and 3D03
    Next year will see...

    My 2cents: Sustainability is the word
    Chers

    • Like 4
  6. chispy querido,  si venis a Baires te espero con un asado típico Argentino con un buen vino en mi casa, solo avisame que venis y nos comunicamos, no te olvides que en Bs. As. tenes una invitación.

    Pero como nos gusta viajar a nosotros también, puede que nos encontremos en algún lugar del mundo, por ahora y para el año que viene creo que voy a Cuba, a Playa Esmeralda en Holguín,  hermosa playa

    • Like 2
  7. Ay amigo chispy, me entristece que te retires, pero seguro que es por una muy buena causa, es una lástima que la aduana acá sea tan estricta sino esa fuente de alimentación Super Nova y ese 12900k ya tendrían nuevo dueño, pero los trámites para ingresar elementos usados son interminables y pueden durar mucho tiempo,
    Abrazo querido amigo y que se venda rápido ya que el hardware es de lo mejor.

    • Like 1
  8. It is correct As SSD 2.0 is a benchmark that leads to the creativity of results
    But punishing those who have not performed any cheats is unfair, wouldn't it be better that from today or tomorrow no longer add points but leave the already obtained hardware and globals?
    Just as the laws cannot be retroactive, removing the points from hw and global is unfair, but  review each score that has been made up to that day, on D-day.

    #For too few, too many lose#


    This is just a personal opinion, to make Hwbot more sustainable and not be changing so much, it's my 2 cents..

×
×
  • Create New...