-
Posts
1959 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Sweet
-
-
Please check this , Gigabyte Ati 9550 in 9550 SE group, link spec of Gigabyte 9550
I Think Wrong category, correct are this :
http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/Radeon%209550
9550 SE is 64 bits and this 9550 /1050 128 bits, see this screen's please
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884119
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884120
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884122'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884122
and more of this guy
Thank's
Sw
Another wrong score (28-08-2009)
9550 128 bits in 9550SE 64bits
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=890423
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=890426
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=890427
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884122
Please check this wrong video card
Thx
Sw
-
Please check this , Gigabyte Ati 9550 in 9550 SE group, link spec of Gigabyte 9550
I Think Wrong category, correct are this :
http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/Radeon%209550
9550 SE is 64 bits and this 9550 /1050 128 bits, see this screen's please
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884084
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884119
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884120
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884122
and more of this guy
Thank's
Sw
please some comments, I wrong, maybe???
Sw
-
Please check this , Gigabyte Ati 9550 in 9550 SE group, link spec of Gigabyte 9550
GV-R955256D HelpPowered by ATI RadeonTM 9550 VPU
Supports AGP 8X and 4 pipelines
Microsoft DirectX® 9.0 and OpenGL® support
Integrated with 256MB DDR memory and 128-bit memory interface
Features DVI-I / D-sub / TV-OUT
I Think Wrong category, correct are this :
http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/Radeon%209550
9550 SE is 64 bits and this 9550 /1050 128 bits, see this screen's please
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884084
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884119
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884120
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884122
and more of this guy
Thank's
Sw
-
Should be easier to see if you choose the "combined results" fane
Thank you xt0m, ...so this is correct score:)
Mhh.. 266 GB ramYes 266 ram
:D:D:D:D
No, nope, not ....cpu-z's bug
Sw
-
-
Thanks Hyperhorn and Freakezoit, again in google..... but got no trick to Aquamark, but I looking for....MMmmm maybe in 2011, I could find
Thank you both
-
I guess you are using Vista 64 Bit? It`s possible.
The easy way: Delete "Direcpll.dll" and try to run AM3 again
The option: Google for "Aquamark 64 Bit patch" and copy this into your folder.
But anyway, AM3 runs slow with Vista so don`t wish too much here.
Thank you, very much, I wanted to try it
Sw
-
Well, that is my doubt, there any way to run on Vista?
Thx
-
it looks like new point distribution system (look at multi-gpu categories) or bug.
bug I hope
I lost several cups of gold and 50 points
Sw
-
i'm lost 50 hardware points (
Idem:(
Sw
-
Thank you jmke.
Sw
-
My score ( radeon 9550 SE) is blocked , this submit data December 6 of 2007, are block today, this score is 1.7 years ago !!!
also no longer have this Video (she is dead, she sleep like an angel:D)
Today (Rules) is in error of screen, but in December 2007 was not an error
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672681
Many times, members of hwbot's crew, said : "...bench with more than 6 months old are not moderated...."
Besides, look the other's bench's with this video, same date and correct bench's , all ok in resolution and the rest...was one of the best videos I've had
Thank's
Sw
Ps: are many old AquaMark score's without Gpu-z, and cpu-z,and other old futuremark without resolution, this must also be blocked too ???
sorry google translate
-
@Sweet: Maybe problem with bot, I can't see the score posted on forum in thread picked by bot.
http://www.pcaxe.com/forum/showthread.php?t=259
But I see that this score 14745 is linked with his older score with 14746 points which is strange.
An on http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?userId=17997&applicationId=5 I cannot see that he have 14745 core, but 14746 that is fixed before.
@HWbot stuff:
If I delete his scores from our forum does the scanned score from bot stays on HWbot, or the score dissapear?
Maybe this can solve problem with his scores and wrong bot picking score, if score picked by bot can be deleted from forum and stay in HWbot database.
Or can you tell me what he should write in description field to recognize card like 8600GT 256 DDR3?
FixedAgain In 3DMark'05 , same case as before. bot problem.
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=861884
Please move to correct category
Regards
-
@Sweet: Maybe problem with bot, I can't see the score posted on forum in thread picked by bot.
I'ts Ok.
Imagine that the problem was
Sw
-
Same guy or team, 8600 GT DDR3 in 8600GT DDR2, now in 3DMark'05
(problem in forum PCAXE ???)
Link:
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=861191
Thx
Sw
-
Thank's both, jmke and Mostru.
Sorry for missing link:o
Sw
-
Please re-check this wrong score in Pifast xeon w3520, the correct score is: 21.06 seg
Scrren's:
Thank you
Sw
-
Should be fixedYes, it should be fixed.
Before few day ago I fixed one of his score.
Problem is with the bot because in the forum he writes 8600GT (default 8600GT was with ddr3) and bot picks up 8600GT ddr2 instead of 8600GT ddr3.I will tell him to put extra ddr3 text in description on forum post in order to bot recognize the card properly.
Thank you both
Sw
-
I report this score same days ago, and today I see validated this wrong VGA ( please see screen's.)
But i think it was wrong, please re-check this bench
Screen's :
Link bench in hwbot:
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=855956
Thank you
Sw
-
I had my global PCM05 score reported for a "lack of validation." Theres nothing wrong with my score. Theres CPU-Z and GPU-Z windows present as well as a full score breakdown.
The guy who reported it thinks there might have been a software RAMdisk used. My score breakdown will show that thats not possible. I used a single I-RAM.
The edit button in the reported score box doesnt work.
... though im not sure what to edit- everything is fine
What happens now?
K
was a mistake of mine, I doubt this was another bench..
this one :
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=832398
Please Excuse me, this error
Regards
Sw
-
Are accepted as harddrive:
-Normal platter harddisk drivers
-Iram / Acard ram drives (DIMM as storage medium, not system memory)
-Solid-state disk (SSD), using flash memory as storage medium
Are not accepted as harddrive:
-Software ramdisks
-MFT software
No doubt ,chispy, honesty is also the person who climbs a score, which must be real, and observing the rules and regulations hwbot.
And now...in this bench, this guy used one WD VR 150 Gb or one acard 9010 with memories RAM ???
RamDisk soft ???? maybe ???
I think it validate in FM, may not be available at hwbot, it depends on the rules of Hwbot.
!We are not FM. Their database can have whatever scores they like. We don't allow these scores which have been under discussion in here.I have been extremely busy in my real work, so our PCMark05 HOF is unchecked. I do it now
I am not the most expert on the subject, hopefully some of the Mod
regards
Sw
Ps: well, my spanish and Italian write, is better, I hope you understand my amazing english:p
-
In my opinion "B" is the most fair
Regars
Sw
-
X800 Gto2 All don't see resolution in 3DMark screen's, same nick, but this is wrong
already reported, but so far has not been checked
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=796918 - No Resolution
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=796915 - No Resolution
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=796914 - No Resolution
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=796912 - No Resolution
And Something Old .....
X1050 in Radeon 9550
Including no resolution in some bench
I made the report in May 2008, on time, with the bell, but has not been changed, for One Mod that it's wrong, not wrong for other, please check again.
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697663
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=738346
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628666
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626713
Check this and....
Thank you
Sw
-
I don't think so
,hehe
:D, already solved, was not a tweak
Sw
very old score reported
in Submission & member moderation
Posted · Edited by Sweet
My 9550 score in 3DMark-01, was reported but it is the year 2007, before the new rules, What shall i do?
Date sumit > 07-12-2007
Link > http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673104
Regards
Sw