-
Posts
1959 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Sweet
-
-
Hola nacho, para el Vantage la pantalla que ya conoces, esta:
http://www.hwbot.org/blog/wp-content/clipboard01.jpg
Lo recuadrado en rojo es obligatorio, lo verde es opcional
Para el PcMark'05 es esta :
En éste caso se necesita el desarrollo del bench, sino va a ser dada de baja
http://www.hwbot.org/blog/wp-content/17656.jpg
En ambos casos si llegas a estar entre los 20 mejores de todos (top 20) se necesita el ORB de Futuremark, de lo contraio, no es necesario con la screen basta.
this one rank:
http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/3dmark_vantage_-_performance/world_records
Un saludo para vos y para marat
Sw
-
-
Nice chip, congratz. and with CO2, when ?
if you lend me, I step through the blender
Es un chip traido por el amigo nosepick ?, me parece conocer ese micro
-
Restricted access
''If you have a score that hasn't got the right ranking/amount of points, it's because a better submission has been moved or removed, and the server hasn't done the recalculation".
So you have to do it manualy."
Step one :
Clic your submission and then, clic the option tab :
Step two :
clic the ''reclaculation'' button :
If the score hasn't got any ranking, points, it's because your submission has been moved, edited or checked by a moderator.
Exemple :
To have your rank/points back you have to do it manualy :
Step one :
Go on your profile, and clic the option tab :
Step two :
Clic the ''force recalculation of best submissions'' button :
-
Please, reads the point 3.4 of the rules and you are going to see that the VGA flashed (or unlocked) go in the original category, in this case 465 GTX
-
Gracias luis, si es verdad, un buen chip, mañana pruebo a mas mhz pero levanta temp
In English: Thank you Luis, yes is a good chip, tomorrow I prove again with + Mhz, but, it raises many temperature with air
-
Memory clock 528 Mhz. Fixed
-
Hi, NuclearFlow, How I-ram have you used in the Pcmark'05 ?
I like to know this, thank you
-
-
Who? Me? *sweet innocent face*
someone called me? I was not !!!
I had that problem, first benchs, when the first few times to use the Vista 64, and I had not even noticed .
The only thing I would ask when you do report is to be a tad more specific. Make the moderators job a little easier in other words. So if the Trolls lair test is bugged, and I have had a few like that when I run the benchmark on Win7 64bit by the way, just point us. Other wise it takes ages to go compare the graphics card and look at ten different results. We are not all pro's like you and have each and every graphic cards comparative GT score in our heads.Fully agree, it is really difficult
-
For the next bench, I not use the ppu, I m sorry.
Thank you for this, done
Sw
-
Thank you Sweet. Will you fix for me please?
Yes, it's a honor for me:)
-
-
Because he didn't disable PhysX on nvidia control panel, but directly on 3DMarkVantage.(you can enable or disable PPU when running the bench ).
Yes i know, but this gpu-z show enable, CPU in Vantage show correct score. (from my point of view)
I'm going to validate this and another now.
regards
Geek87, give me five minutes
-
Hi, Geek87, please, can you explain me why PhisX is on in Gpu-z ?
I intend to find an explanation in order to validate this score
i think that you should show ORB of this Vantage, maybe, because others can use the excuse "bugs gpu-z", you understand me ?
Thanks
PS. and another score
-
Look if the resolution it's Ok.
Hugs
(fijate que la resolciònn sea la correcta, Abrazos)
Sw
-
After an investigation I supose that it was for this:
I don't know if it was my mistake or another system bug, but this was fix
The best is close the subject here, because I won't accept any kind of insult.
Thanks to 1Day and Christian to your support
-
Thanks Chirs, maybe I blocked one score?, maybe I blocked some score of him?, i don't remember, maybe i was wrong
but not how to express their discontent.
It is best to express something specific, because in this way really don't understand
Regards Chris.
-
What?
please respectfully, I do not know you nor do I have confidence to express it this way, to anyone.
Now, well, what you want to tell me with this ?
I do not see the bench this wrong, if I'm wrong let me know, please do not necessary express it that way, I am always willing to listen and I can be mistaken as anyone
I wait your reply, thanks
Sw
PS: Please write your thoughts in clear and concise way, thanks
-
Pablo, please run this bench at default settings (1280x1024) not (1280x768)bench again with another monitor that supports 1280x1024.
Blocked this , thats is right, I'm so sorry
Regards
In Spanish: Pablo por favor correr este bench en default (1280x1024) no (1280x768) corrèr de nuevo el 3DMark'06 con otro monitor que soporte èsta resoluciòn.
Bloquear èsto es lo correcto, lo siento.
Saludos
-
Me too 1Day, request new sreen last night because the resolution was hidden, my decision to request new screen and now he do it . (X- Tripiot : Run again - new screen)
Also in the 3DMark'05 is the ORB and I see no problem, the lack of resolution is because the test was run without a key(default setting), so this would be Ok.
I'm really interested in knowing why
Thanks
Sw
-
250 views but no results(only sweet), come on guys.
Chris...soon, I will test, on the other cpu is disarmed, Seagate 250 GB x2 in raid 0.
I'm on the subject
"C'mon people this is for all"
Thanks
Sw
-
If you look at transparant windows, you score higher than Win Vista.
Also Video encoding and file decryption are way to high for that system.
Used some unknown tweaks ?
Yes , video encoding and file description are too high
Anyway, some unknown tweak has been used, or bug maybe ?
-
great work !!!
We would like to dedicate this score to our friend Mariosalice who died 2 months agomuch better with this mention
Sw
fl0w3n - Xeon W3520 @ 4890MHz - 8sec 300ms SuperPi
in Result Discussions
Posted
Please to provide a new screen where one sees clearly cpu - z, nothing must cover the information.
thanks
Sw