MaXtoRZP

no any answer ... =\

https://community.hwbot.org/topic/220312-the-official-hwbot-team-cup-2022-nvidia-gpu-thread/

That's wrong stage. Ddr2 ram only!

That's not Vega 8 picasso!

why 9900KF is allowed, but xeons are only 6 cores or less?? Does it honestly you think?

Does any rule regulating m/b tab presence on superpi screenshot??! Neither superpi nor stage rules aren't regulate it.

thuban cores are forbidden for this stage

8700k +x299? Ошибка, наверное

L4nc3 You must set dram frequency at 533 or 400 in the BIOS. Then you may increase Ht frequency. To my mind you ought to beat 3.4-3.5GHz.Your CPU clock by default is nearby technological limit (for air cooling), so it can't be clocked to great

Ticket ID: 31 Priority: Medium Please add such cpu.\r\nValidation:\r\nhttp://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=379806

This result has been verificated at ORB. Or no matter for you??? Rule - is rule? It seems that you wanna lose a lot of registered members of hwbot.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696079 Matched to wrong category. 12k/06 is toooooo high for 8600GT. Proof link is broken. Please block

I can't see any problems of that, because there is no such category as 4200 Brisbane - it's the first. And the second: Bris core is slower than Windsor one on the same clocks.

Once again That's not a E2160, it's E6300: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607152 And here we can't see any CPU-z or other one CPUID, only result's log of SPI http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609982 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610753 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610730

Hello, i think there is not 6200A result: The TurboCache Technology is for PCI-E only as i know or i'm not right? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594133 Another one, can't see any screenies: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587907

So, that's another one. I cannot believe that it's AGP 6200A (64Bit) results I'm running now Mark06 on the 6200A and the HDR\SM3.0 tests are locked (unavialable) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=582928

No, but, it's my mistake. Excuse please. I'll be more seriouly observe the screens next time. Sorry again.

Does anybody see the resolution settings on these screenies? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602376 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602374 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602375

SF3D Thanks a lot for your attention.

2 Maxi, SF3D I'm not prefer to post fake results. I didn't thought about the resolution, but it was set as default. The results of 3D Marks are rather higher than others 1300Pro exact because of DDR3 onboard memory. You must understand that it's impossible to connect all of benching machines to the internet , so what's why that results have not a futuremark orb links. As for 630 i've corrected the screenie, so you may unblock it now (http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593123)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589006 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593123 I can't understand. Who can explain?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=597986 World record on tualatin 1.1 in SPi - 1.26 sec

As you know this chipset does not beats the records in FSB Rate. So i had found that if FSB higher than 332- the sytem is able to pass CPU benching tests, but not 3D tests. As for voltage - the system is rock-stable at fsb 330, Vcore 1.45 (set by BIOS)/1.41 (as PCProbe shows), FSB Termination +0.1, NB Voltage +0.1. Vmem 2.1V. Memories are full stable upto 355 @ 3-3-3-9-1T 2.1V

2 Massman, demiurg I know that there are not cheats. But if anybody didn't paid an attention for that - they would be the best in SuperPi32m till now. I can't understand why so experienced members made such mistakes.

I cannot understand such incredible results in SuperPi 32M made by Hinnavaatlus team: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594657 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594659 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594581 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594614 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594602 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594601 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594615 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594628 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594648 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594612 and others..... real cheaters.......Im angry of those guys