-
Posts
74 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by MachineLearning
-
Hello, Please consider adding this motherboard when you get a chance: Soyo SY-P4I865PE Plus Dragon 2 v1.0 https://valid.x86.fr/vyzrvl Thanks for your time.
-
Thank you
-
Hello, Please consider adding the following hardware when you have the time: - Mali G610 MC3 https://valid.x86.fr/a/4z2rl8 - SanDisk X400 SSD https://valid.x86.fr/htb6sj Thank you
-
Hello, This is not a new board, but perhaps an edit to an existing board. EVGA X58 Classified3 is listed as 141-BL-E764. However, this is actually the Classified Hydro Copper. Classified3 is actually: 141-GT-E770, as shown here (photo not mine). Kind thanks for your time. ?
-
That makes sense. Unfortunately no, nothing unusual. Same RAM timings available as usual. I can PM screenshots if you're interested. Also have details on the board/other changes here: https://warp9-systems.proboards.com/thread/1838/intel-bad-axe-d975xbx2-kr At the bottom is a changelog, including all timings I could alter. And a link to a .Zip including ITK 4.0.x, .ITW file, .BIO, everything necessary.
-
It seems this could also be possible without any hard mods. Using the Intel Integrator Toolkit & D975XBX2KR, the multiplier can be forced to 14x through BIOS editing. I have just tested it with success: EDIT: Nevermind, in-OS it is still 20x multi...
-
It seems that the Pifast stage is slightly broken. I assume it should whitelist Prescott-256 CPUs alongside Prescott-256-64, currently only the latter is accepted.
-
I hope to see a huge variety of chipsets. It would be awesome to see i975X up to X48, oddball SiS & VIA, DDR1 through DDR3, etc. ?
-
Thanks This is the most detailed info I can extract. Both CPU-Z & AIDA64 just say MT6879, but DevCheck lists it as MT6879V/ZA. Although as you can plainly see, it also misidentifies the chip as Dimensity 820 and gets core configuration incorrect.
-
Thank you kindly. I did make a mistake calling the Dimensity 1050 the MT6879; MT6879 is (as you added) the Dimensity 920, which is identical to the 1050 except for mmWave support & the GPU (Mali G68-MC4 vs G610-MC3 respectively). They are even on the same node (TSMC 6nm). CPU-Z identifies it as MT6879, which I suppose is dead-on per the CPU side. So, does this matter for submissions? Should I submit MediaTek Dimensity 1050 under 920? Makes no difference to me how you do it, I just am interested in knowing. Thanks again!
-
Hello, Would you kindly add these parts to the DB? SK Hynix Gold S31 SATA SSD MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (MT6879) Super Flower Leadex III series PSUs Thank you for your time ?
-
The Official Team CUP 2022 Thread:
MachineLearning replied to Leeghoofd's topic in HWBOT Competitions
Yes, but only E4x00 are valid for this category because of cache sizes -
The Official Team CUP 2022 Thread:
MachineLearning replied to Leeghoofd's topic in HWBOT Competitions
I second this, Allendale-2M should only be L2 & M0 cores. G0 = Conroe/Kentsfield.