Massman
-
Posts
20466 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
14
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Massman
-
-
verified, thx for posting
-
so the national rankings are based on the scores and not on the hwboints ?
I like the idea
-
Cpu-z validation says:
-
We really need to stress the fact that we work with version 4.1, not 4.3! 4.3 gives better results, so there is no possibility to compare both benches.
-
Yeah, but there's a gray area when the score is at stock speed, or nothing to brag about.
I hate to see my colleagues / friends scores blocked, just because they wanted to do a quick test with their computer and didn't know how to take screenshots.
You are 100% correct about that. That's why I love the ability to filter out all non-hwboint scores
-
If the score gains hwboints without clear verification, I block it (which is the fairest way, I think).
-
Will check on it, thanks for letting us know
-
I edited 2 scores, are there more wrong entries ?
-
I posted up my 3500+ Clawhammer result not realising i needed to specify "Clawhammer" so it was initially recorded as a "Newcastle".
I've now editted my entry to be Clawhammer, which will give me #1 1M for that core, but it's still listed as #3 Newcastle 1M.
Is it just a lag between me changing it and the site being updated?
Yesterday i've tried to clean out the newcastle results, because it's really messy (indeed, if you just enter 3000+, it becomes a newcastle). It's almost done, but I'm really thankful you edited the score yourself.
Thanks
-
Oh, I just changed the cpu speeds, not the score. Fixed it now
-
corrected, thanks for letting us know
-
Should I type slowly soo as not to crash it?
No we really want to stress the system
-
OPB's hitting the jackpot, almost at 350
Time to start benching again mtkzi
-
-
Yeah, it's good to see the face of a famous clocker
-
Hell no, not even in the condition to do that.
http://koti.mbnet.fi/boble76/TEAM_SKOOTTERIT/3-5.2.2006/004.jpg
Finnish way of tuning the OCers first.
I like the finnish way
-
Great work Massman!
Just one thing though. You may have to check the blocked scores again due to the bug that shows the external image url (screenshot) only if there is also a verification url. Sorry.
If you copy the image url to the verification field then both will show up.
Okay, no problem.
Coderman (Okay, Richbastard ...
), is there any way I can search through the blocked results only? -
Hats of to you, sir.
Did you also check the cpu clockspeeds, or just validation?Now do SuperPi 1M.
I checked validation + clockspeed
SuperPi 1M will take more time
By the way, can we search through the results and filter out the verified results ? (cfr. filter blocked results)
-
Just finished the last entries at 09/09 22h30. It took me about two days to check every single entrie in the 32M challenge, but finally the database is ok.
# [ SuperPi 32m ] (417 results) : 09/09/06 22h30
# [ PiFast ] (104 results) : 10/09/06 14h30
Next up: SiSandra
-
I thought you were going to say hwbot.org benching team, but nooooo.
This is getting difficult ...
I'll do the thing you all say we can't ... double post my scores
-
Since no one even cares a bit about Team.BE, I changed very result to [M], the other belgian site
-
they look expensive
-
Best buy? (moddified) First setup of course!
2600+ XP-M
DFI Lanparty
2*256 BH-5
FX5700 (bought for 20€, mems overclock super)
-
hi there i think with the top lets say 20 results in 3d01 we should include whether lod has been used as on a 60,000 score on 3d01 it can make 1000-1500 points difference its easily spotted as with a 65000 score nature is generally 500 and odd fps and with lod it can be 800-900fps , just an observation so people get an accurate account of score
Well, since LOD can be used by ATI and NVIDIA cards, it's no longer considered as a cheat (ATI benchers referred to LOD before they could use it).
Like you said, almost all the top scores are with lod.
3500+ listed as Newcastle - should be Clawhammer
in Submission & member moderation
Posted
I see your point, edited