-
Posts
837 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by stummerwinter
-
-
In english please!
-
Holy smoke!
A new russian armada is coming!
:celebration:
-
Happy birthday!
:celebration:
-
Crazy video, thanx for sharing! Quality is, let's say, ok...:-D Keep overlocking!
-
Congrats, amzing score! Killer CPU...:nice:
-
Really impressive, congrats!
-
That's quiet abvious hardware sharing...
A mod need to fix this (sry, not me)...
-
The problem will arise in the "amateur" class, where gray areas like reviewers that get some freebies might want to be in it, but it wouldn't be fair to people who pay for everything, etc. If everyone will want to be in the pro class, then there's no reason to have one. The reason to make two classes is because people are upset that things aren't "fair".
But these rumours will come asap when a amatuer-class starts. How will you controll it? Only by trust? That's something we allready see doesn't work...
If somebody get only a little support, what would they prefer (not everybody), beeing Top 5 amateur or Top 30 pro? I'm allready through something similar in sports, even for phsychologial/personal reasons it better to be top in a lower class then end of the ranking in a higher league, trust me, have seen this many times...
I think the big thing is what are the manufacturer think about it? Did you guys already talk to them about a "pro" league?What were their initial thought? If they don't want to think about it, I think the debate is closed. And on visibility purpose, will it be better to be seen as # 30 in the pro league, or #1 in amateur, cause I think if the manufacturer agree with 2 league there will be more motivation for the amateur to work his arse off to get up there so he have some visibility, and maybe a chance to move upAt the end manufacturers dont' care if they get enough publicity...
-
Massman you don't know who the sponsored people are ?
Are you kidding us man ?
Considering that sponsored for overclocking differs from getting 1 review sample every now and then, it's quite easy...
Let's see if I can guess some...
HiCookie
Andre Yang
Nickshih
SF3D
K|ngp|n
elmor
hipro5
kinc
hiwa
stummerwinter
youngpro
Deanzo
Vivi ( at least until a few months ago )
I didn't read the whole thread, just to step in here...
I'm against splitting up the ranking, because:
- how to control who is pro or not?
- will there be a group of people to decide this?
- how much suplier given hardware disqualifies you from non-pro?
- rumors/accusing will get more non-pro, where people have to prove not getting support
For me personally it would be disaponting competing against the real big ones, I personally get only more or less mainboard support (extra where 2 PSUs, and some VGAs only for testing/selecting). Stuff like ONE CPU (selected one out of five non pretested CPUs) in the last two years and some VGAs, memory where some kind of compensation for hard work on exibitions, and this ist hard work and costs a lot of time in preparation these...
I spent this year thousands of euro out of my own pocket, so for me I would step back to non-pro and give up support from ASUS...
So, from my point of view, don't split, I would not change anything, I think, it would get worse...
I missed one thing...
A lot of people complained about unfair old hwbot-ranking/point system, but now, are there real changes in the top rankings? The only thing I see that much more effort (money + time) is needed to stay in Top10/20 compared to last year...Some are new, some are out of this top...
Missed another thing:
Hiding informations will increase too! Actions like the one from hipro and Kinc will getting less and less because pros will NOT share their informations. I really appreciated the things by both did last days...:celebration:
Third thing missed:
Have a lock back in the last lets say two years...The key is NOT getting hardware support from a manufacturer, the key is having direct access either to INTEL getting selected CPUs or get a lot of them (which way ever) and have luck to select a real good one...Even in bot 2.0 the CPU is still the key (accept 3D03 and maybe 3DV with GT)...
-
-
WTF! Congrats, that's insane...
-
Life goes on
You're right on this...
There is more then OCing...
But it's getting more and more diaspointing for me atm...
Even if I don't get answers on my mails, don't talk about ocers here...
Just from ES-rules itself, ES belongs to manufacturer, they should not be ranked. It's not only since GT, it's long time ago that...
Only problem I see to proof it, CPU-Z shows ES, GPU-Z doesn't...
@Petri: for you it was 2009, for me it's 2010...
-
nice one, go for more!
-
Great scores my friend!
-
There is normally a batch-file included in the downloads which gives you the right settings...
So start the batch-file, not the *.exe...
-
Hi Pete,
3D06 CPU-Test seems bit low...Caused by ATI-card?
Had arround 14000 with GTX480@AIR...
-
Yes, frequencies shown in CPU-Z/GPU-Z are the ones the people put into the database...
-
Damn, congrats, great score...
-
AM3 epic fail!
-
Great pics from massman, missed this in the morning...
-
Here a test on AOCM on R3E:
Was able to do on P6T WS 6200 MHz, but score was only ~ 12800 points...
Did a cross check and confirmed...
-
Damn, need to do the vMEM-Mod...
-
-
@Andre, would say: hard work to find the one!
Just jump into here...
Shure, had luck with my retail...
Will do more testing next weekend, maybe 3DV (even I don't like it) and some 3D06, let's see, what I can do...
Only problem I face right now, CPU does AM3, PiFast and 3D05 above 6,3 GHz, but can't run 1M at 6,2...
Allready discuss this on XS...
Hiwa - Core i7 980X @ 6933MHz - 5sec 866ms SuperPi
in Result Discussions
Posted
Congrats bro!