Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

JunkDogg

Members
  • Posts

    306
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by JunkDogg

  1. If you want to know if something changed for compatibility reasons, why not just ask that. Claiming "the bench is broken" is needlessly negative and will of course cause a reaction.

     

    Mat's putting a lot of work in this benchmark and it's one of the better ones we currently have at the bot. It wouldn't hurt being a bit more positive in your approach.

     

    Anyway, just my 2c.

     

    Well technically if it did work and now doesn't, it is "broken". As the dictionary says "Not functioning, not in order" under broken. :lol:

  2. Nah nothing there, had another look.

     

    Tried installing SDK separately, tried rolling back to 12.1 and 12.4 with older OpenCL in it.

     

    Nothing.

     

    A quick google search has revealed quite a few "miners" who had the same problem trying to mine with these cards. Maybe they just aren't OpenCL compatible?

     

    Will keep searching around and see if there is a fix somewhere buried deep in the interwebs.

  3. CPU-z is our verification system that we trust. It's hard to believe when it's not working the way that it should especially on systems which are that old and worked for years without problems. Now we have the situation that verification isnt working correctly. And thus all verifications made with those versions can be considered worthless because you cant trust them. Sorry but it's simply unfair for future benchers who dont profit from software bugs. It's not the way that I want to sound like a teacher. My english abilitys are bit limited so I really dont want to write essays and explain everything in detail. But I still want to say my opinion. It's never meant personaly. So it's not against you or classicplatforms in general. But just go ahead and keep attacking me.

     

    This is possibly the most confusing post I've ever read.

     

    Please do not now sit there and pretend to be the victim, you came out and pretty much called everyone using the current version of CPU-Z cheats. Now you are back pedaling.

     

    There is no current fix for this(if it really is a bug,as it can't be proven until new version is made) so until then there is really no point to complaining about it mate.

     

    Once the new version is here and the bug can be verified, it's a few peoples word against other people's word.

     

    I honestly would be suprised if we see it before the end of TC, then what delete every submission in the comp that has used the old version? There will be anarchy.

  4. Let me bounce this back: is it fine to have the points make people feel worse about what they do?

     

    If someone puts in hours of work to fine-tune their system on air cooling, end up first in their class, and only receive 5.8pts. Then see someone randomly running LN2 and receive 20-odd points, just because the frequency is much higher. Is that good for you? :)

     

    Your argument of "points shouldn't matter" goes both ways. If they don't matter in your opinion, then you should have no problem accepting additional points for air submissions. It's not mutually exclusive with teaching new overclockers that overclocking is more than just the points.

     

    Just get rid of points all together.

    I'm sick to death of hearing about points.

     

    Just do the rankings per benchmark, per class. Simple and no more bunnyextraction over some imaginary point system that means bunny all in the grand scheme of things.

×
×
  • Create New...