Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Sparks.nl

Members
  • Posts

    777
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Sparks.nl last won the day on October 22 2023

Sparks.nl had the most liked content!

2 Followers

Converted

  • Location
    Netherlands

Converted

  • Interests
    Overclocking and photography

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Sparks.nl's Achievements

Proficient

Proficient (10/14)

  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • Dedicated Rare
  • Reacting Well Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare

Recent Badges

105

Reputation

  1. So since I can’t compete with old school records from now on this is my last uploaded score, good luck to you all.
  2. I see there is something new in versions there. So this is the point where I can leave all old school behind me then. No need to try and take records which cannot be taken. Since back then they could gain at least 50-100MHz by running older versions of CPUz. No use trying to out bin any cpu because CPUz will hold you back anyway.
  3. I just noticed you use CPUz 2.09. Please validate with 1.73 next time and see…
  4. Nice! Good result. I missed this one. My first and only 6400+ has a vid of 1.35v as well (and is better on air then my 6000+ is).
  5. I am prepared to beta test. I just never saw the question. I am prepared to think about IT Security as well by the way. There is just 1 thing: Time (as I don't have that much).
  6. Yes it seems good so far. The other one was 100MHz slower.
  7. That can’t be good for your cpu… warming it up.
  8. PI 1M slowest score contest? No HW limits. Edit: I was thinking of something else. An e core only stage.
  9. Ah, forgot you were here as well…
  10. Thanks. Well it looks like at least some BY were good enough. From what I expect: not many. It is: KABYE 0543FPMW. Yes it seems like that most chips do not scale much beyond. I have an FX BN that likes -110C. But there are not many.
×
×
  • Create New...