Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Lucky_n00b

Members
  • Posts

    852
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Posts posted by Lucky_n00b

  1. If I had to guess, maybe it's the the competition date that's so close to Computex, that made every high-profile ocer attending the tradeshow can't really bench properly during that time.

     

    Anyway, I learn a great deal about e-powering the GT 730 during this competition, Thanks a lot to Gigabyte hosting these kind of competition, and to Websmile who's working hard to moderate the competitions.

     

    Congratulations to the winners, see you on the Ryzen Competition ;)

  2. Lucky, did you test it on water ? is it worth upgrade from 6950x for real world + benching ? :) Offcourse congrats for result !

     

    I didn't bring my AIO with me to Computex, but I did test it on small tower HSF(the ID-Cooling SE204K). The thermal output from this beast was quite massive, running 4.5G at 1.2v will always resulted in 80+ C temperature range.

     

    It was way more fun than 6950X on LN2 though ;)

  3. nah high clocks and/or voltage (unstable card / artifacts in general) will cause this. Apparently it doesnt render properly so you get massive numbers.

     

    Thx for the explanation, I was getting instability and almost full screen artifact a lot around 1950-ish @ 1.55-1.58v, but never caused the raymarch score to 'boost' like that. If the errors was too much it will simply gave 'driver-revert' error

  4. AGESA 1005 subtiming on GBT AX370-Gaming 5 works OK, I just did a quick test for familiar timings (TWR,TCWL,TRRD, TRTP, TWTR, etc), but not touching the extras like ProcODT, TRDRD, etc.

    This is the example of Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000C15 (Hynix)

    AGESA1005_2933_Tight.jpg

     

    Geekbench 3 Memory Score AUTO Subtiming: 5169

    Screenshot-143_Hynix2933_DefSubs.jpg

     

    Geekbench 3 Memory Score, manual subtiming: 5849

    Screenshot-147_Hynix2933TightSubs.jpg

     

    The fun is back it seems :D :D

     

    P.S: Full Test Here (Indonesian, google-translateable)

    • Like 1
  5. so the first thing is to submit earlier then others. then I get the chance to bench tomorrow and even if I do similar scores as top 3 I will still get lower points ? whats the logic in this ? or I not understand the rules ?

     

    If I understand it right, the scores is based on the delta(difference) between the 'XTU target' and your score, the smaller the difference the higher position you get.

    Of course, there will be same scores from all other overclocker, so you have to submit first or you lose ranking (since if there's same score, the one getting most points is the one who submit it earlier).

     

    So in principle, you wanted to score really close with target and submit it really fast when the stage is opened.

  6. No restrictions on which Gigabyte or Aorus board is used, only es, unreleased hardware and LN2 prototypes are forbidden

     

    Got similar question,

     

    I saw "Open to all GIGABYTE motherboards, except for Intel HEDT (High-End Desktop Platform) CPUs" on the OC-eSports annoucement page: OC eSports

     

    But on the stage limitation, there was no rule stating X99/HEDT is allowed or not. So what's the official ruling for this? Will X99/X79 be allowed or not?

     

    Cheers,

     

    (IMHO, I don't mind using any xtu-capable platform, since it's target score after all)

×
×
  • Create New...