Lucky_n00b
-
Posts
852 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
11
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Lucky_n00b
-
-
We're still benching. SO many problems
-
We were benching last 2 or 3 consecutive nights without getting any sleep (work during the day) and when the stages were finally over, I went to bed in the evening and woke up at 6 next morning...12+ hours of sleep
I was hoping we can get that APU stage, but Indonesia managed to beat 3 of our scores. We could do better, but the asrock board died just 15 minutes after the start with the first APU to bench (6400K). It was really a gem with the best IMC from all our APUs (1400+) and really strong GPU (1400MHz 1.35V on water). 1800MHz should have been possible on LN2. Next day we got the Asus board, but there was not enough time to rebench it, if it's still alive. Other scores could have been better too, but we were limited in time and resources.
For Aquamark stage we didn't have a good Bulldozer and Gigabyte boards were throttling with really high clocks, so I'm happy we managed to get the 3rd place.
For 3DMark we simply didn't have enough time and suitable hardware. I tried to get some good score with the HD3850 on LN2, but something went wrong, so I had to post the single score on air produced 30 minutes before that. Not sure, but maybe the only team that managed to clock the memory on these stupid PCI 610 cards
GunGod managed to get the Llano Catzilla score literally 10 minutes before the end. Additional 300-400 points were possible there as well.
Thanks to my teammates for the hard work, now need to concentrate on the other stages
Crazy work you've done bro! That 5400K + 6400K APU clock is awesome. Had you been able to squeeze more on the top end setup (Llano, Trinity and Richland), you guys would've won the stage.
Respect man
-
Whew..benching for 2 days in a row was very exhausting. Now can take a little rest and push for the last 4 stages with BIG points
Keep pushing it guys
Cheers,
-
Lol I was enjoying this until I started getting my ass kicked by this dumbass AM3 argh. Junk
I feel ya bro, we're also tortured with this AM3 stage since we're only going 4 setup instead of 5. Hopefully we're not that far behind in terms of points x_x
-
BOOM!! 400k++ with AMD setup! Awesome man!
-
Aaaaaand finally the A85X-UP4 bit the dust(The APUs were intact though), Had to rebench some of the APUs with F2A85-V Pro. ... why now of all times
-
Just a quick note for everybody: Alva sent a video to me of the run and all is fine. It shows the run and afterwards they open CPU-Z (CPU and memory) and also XTU to display all the settings. So the score is fine
Thanks a lot for the clarification Roman
Cheers,
-
Im not pointing any fingers man, thats why we have mods
No problem buddy, I'm just trying to make it clear
I find it unbelievable myself when I saw a laptop running a DDR3-2400, that's why i made the video
Cheers,
-
Not to be "that" guy but you will be pulling the obviously bs times right let me know if you need any help or just put Sam on the case ....
Which one is it man? Did you mean one of my friends laptop cpu?
If that's the one you doubt, there is a video i made during the score session, lemme check
-
Notebook is still doable for pi round, but that Aquamark FX is really hard for us to complete. Until today no sign of another 2 athlon FX (FX-55 + FX-60) to complete that stage. Have been around to old pc stores, 2nd-hand market, and found only one FX-62 but not the others. There's one FX-60 on ebay but the buyer won't ship to Indonesia. Argh
:( -
If that's a 5550 PCI with 128-bit memory controller then we're all screwed
:p -
@ Leeghoofd & I.nfraR.ed:
Dang, have to be careful with my UP4 then..thanks for the heads-up though
-
Anyone get's a 6690D2 in GPU-Z combining a 3870K and a 6670 GPU in Hybrid crossfire... tried different versions of GPU-Z and drivers always the same 2 (1024 shared memory) or even 3GPUs ( 512 shared memory) pop up in the GPU-Z tab where it mentions Crossfire is enabled...
plz don't tell me we need to install a special version of win7 to get it reading it out correctly
Yeah man, I also don't get 6690D2 also by combining 6550D+6670, so I guess we can just put two GPU-Z tab for the clarification?
-
Ahahah, will change it in a moment, my eyes must be very tired
-
Is it allowed to run 3dm03 without systeminfo?
My hybrid and integrated setup seems to have a problem starting the benchmark ("3DMark has stopped working"), but it was doing fine if the systeminfo was disabled.
Thanks,
-
On a side note. Next year: Lucid graphics? Must use 1 AMD and 1 NVIDIA GPU?
How about 'PCIe at x1'Ian, please don't give Massman more weird and crazy idea
:D * Dang, The FX Aquamark stage already giving me headaches now x_x *
-
I've started benching using ASUS M6E only a while ago(for HOT), and lost both of my best CPU on XTU bench. (Pretty sure it was the benchmark that kills and not the board, since I Also kill one 4770K on MPOWER MAX)
But i want to ask, Did that 'fully manual mode'(not the max vcore) kills cpu more easier during heavy bench? or that options have no effect?
-
Very interesting find indeed Splave, thanks a lot!
Time to re-did this bench on the 4960X then
:D -
1) Yeah, different. 6620G is Sumo core.
2) Good call! It is in fact Scrapper core (and 7640D is Scrapper too, but different generation). Made the distinction in the database, both count as different GPU cores.
Thanks Mass
So just to further clarify, we can use these APUs to fulfill the 5 submission requirement for Catzilla stage:
1. A10-6800K / HD 8670D - devastator'
2. A10-5800K / HD 7660D- devastator
3. A8-3870K / HD 6550D - beaver creek
4. A6-6400K / HD 8470D - scrapper'
5. A6-5400K / HD 7540D - scrapper
Is that right?
-
Question:
For the Catzilla AMD APU stage, I see that the HD 6550D is stated using 'BeaverCreek' Core, and HD 6620G using 'Sumo' Core (although GPU-Z will state both GPU using 'sumo' core) Does that mean those two is considered using two different cores?
one more,
According to hwbot, the HD 8470D is using Devastator' Core, but TPU Gpudb is listing this GPU using 'Scrapper' Core - which one was it was correct?
Thanks a lot
-
Congratulations Everyone!
Even after killing 2 of my best CPU, a Maximus VI Extreme and one Impact, I couldn't put up good scores to qualify
:p. This was one of the toughest 2D challenge I've seen in this year, really CRAZY scores, with many gem CPU deaths (especially in XTU x_x). I say that those 5 overclockers on top really deserves to be in the Final. Vegas, baby! Looking forward to see the livestream on the finals
-
Hey all,
Just to give a quick update on the Hynix MFR situation. Kingston and HWBOT just finished a conference call to discuss this problem, and the decision is to not allow any Hynix MFR for this competition. The goal of this competition is to make things fair for all participants. An official rule amendment will follow later this/next week. This is just a heads-up to prevent anyone from wasting time on MFR.
Good one Mass, nice to see Kingston trying to level the playing field for everyone
-
KEREN pakde Hazzan!!! *sembah* Tapi telat dikit submitnya yah
-
Thanks mate, will try my retail next
The official HWBOT Country Cup 2013 thread.
in HWBOT Competitions
Posted · Edited by Lucky_n00b
Excuse me,
I received an information from one of my fellow overclockers in Indonesia (yudhiagust), that his submission has been reported. This is the report:
And I did look at the 3DMark Cloud Gate benchmark rules on http://www.hwbot.org/news/9044_application_51_rules/ , and it indeed says that the benchmark version of 1.0.0 is not allowed to be used.
So I would like to confirm, is the submission of my friends is going to be blocked because his use of version 1.0 of the benchmark? If that were the case, would our submission before these submission still counted on the average? (IIRC, we did submit some scores with v1.1 before, but a lower score though)
Thanks,
Cheers,
Alva