Everything posted by Don_Dan
- luke997 - 3x GeForce GTX 480 @ 880/1000MHz - 32255 marks 3Dmark 2006
- luke997 - Core i7 980X @ 4926.6MHz - 8sec 346ms SuperPi
- chew* - DDR @ 278MHz - 799.7 marks MaxxMem
-
errr hmmmm
It's bugged regardless of the fact you can reproduce it on your system. This just happens on some systems. Why? No idea... -.- If I recall correctly some of the older versions bugged with Gulftown, did you try the latest version as well?
-
errr hmmmm
Latency is bugged, 11ns is way too low.
- Yotomeczek - Celeron LGA775 352 @ 7536.6MHz - 7536.55 mhz CPU-Z
- Yotomeczek - Pentium 4 651 @ 7242.3MHz - 7242.34 mhz CPU-Z
- Linuxfan - GeForce GTX 480 @ 901/1163MHz - 112864 marks 3Dmark 2003
- jale00 - DDR3 @ 2140MHz - 2573 marks MaxxMem
- MrIcee - DDR @ 284MHz - 642.8 marks MaxxMem
- chew* - DDR @ 624MHz - 738.4 marks MaxxMem
- chew* - DDR2 @ 600MHz - 905 marks MaxxMem
-
aGeoM - 2x DDR2 @ 581.2MHz - 1028.1 marks MaxxMem
Guys, I'm not a n00b, I know how important latency is in this benchmark, but a difference of 7ns to the second best score is HUGE!
- knopflerbruce - DDR @ 269.4MHz - 702.8 marks MaxxMem
-
aGeoM - DDR2 @ 580MHz - 1181.9 marks MaxxMem
Nice new score, but 33.9ns is very low... So it was not related to the chipset. Are you using the same OS install?
-
aGeoM - 2x DDR2 @ 581.2MHz - 1028.1 marks MaxxMem
Did you find the super-tweak? ^^
-
aGeoM - 2x DDR2 @ 581.2MHz - 1028.1 marks MaxxMem
Massman, at first I thought there was something wrong with this score as well as I have seen many bugged scores getting posted, but since it's only hitting 5ns lower latency then normal I don't think it's bugged, but of course it could be some new kind of bug. Maybe it's due to the NV chipset? I can only comment on Intel chipsets but they are hitting lower latencies as well, check Vendetta's DDR2 score for example. However, I did not expect the chipset on AMD to create such a big difference in MaxxMem.
-
The Poll: Allow E.S. or disallow ?
Don_Dan replied to BenchZowner's post in a topic in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestionsAll the other guys posting in this thread don't have a "possible motive"? Eh?! knopflerbruce was faster.... -.-
-
The Poll: Allow E.S. or disallow ?
Don_Dan replied to BenchZowner's post in a topic in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestionsOkay: - manufacturers allowing people to bin from an enormous amount of samples - manufacturers prebinning hardware directly at the factory and handing them to a select few - manufacturers working out mod instructions and giving them to a select few Just to name a few things. I cannot understand why everyone is so furious about ES samples, if those get banned from HWBot, people will either rebrand their hardware as retail or they will start binning retail hardware. I would be really curious about how many of the guys complaining now tried a few A0 samples without finding a freak chip. If someone of the those people had found a great chip, would that change his opinion? Gautam, you posted while I was writing my post, you put my thoughts into words perfectly.
-
aGeoM - 2x DDR2 @ 581.2MHz - 1028.1 marks MaxxMem
Damn, what a huge score, now Intel will never have a chance at the MaxxMem DDR2 record again. -.- Congrats, really well done! :-)
-
The Poll: Allow E.S. or disallow ?
Don_Dan replied to BenchZowner's post in a topic in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestionsThis. People need to realize ES processors are not the problem...
-
mkultra - GeForce GTX 480 @ 938/1063MHz - 26373 marks 3DMark Vantage - Performance
Great score for just water cooling!
- Alriin - Core i7 980X @ 5800MHz - 6min 27sec 500ms SuperPi 32m
-
thijs - Phenom II X2 555 BE @ 6300MHz - 11sec 453ms wPrime 32m
Well done!
- Calathea - DDR2 @ 658MHz - 902.1 marks MaxxMem