CaNNon
-
Posts
81 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by CaNNon
-
-
Too bad
I don't think so, tying the run is not the same as dethroning the run.
sounds like a fair way to handle it to me.
-
did you check the screenshots in my last post?
he "tweaks" his systems to have 100% improvement without changing CPU speed, memory timings OR the score window;)
Yea i do agree as i posted, i just wanted to make sure it was clear it was not just because of the lost line. As that's very easy to duplicate.
-
I'm not so sure, I mean the score looks wrong to me too... a ban may well be in order but we should have some proof. I would sure like to know how it was done?
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=792032
Notice my missing line and the app's i have open, I simply used the compress for web feature in Infranview. It's a free app easy to find and does a good compression job.
-
superpi is not the only INTEL optimized benchmark
superpi is only the benchmark where everyone knows that it is INTEL optimized
i dont make an comparative in other benchmarks. but i know in cinebench it is the same problem!
and maybe it is in other benchmarks like 3dmark ore so the same problem
Think were looking at it a little backwards when we start thinking like this (no offense to OP just using as a example). Both CPU's are given the same instruction call's, it's up to the chips engineers/designers to optimize what happens with it.
-
Thanks nice to have that all working!
-
I don't think splitting categories for cpu's is a good idea top total needs to always be the best performer.
But on the other hand I don't see why a sub category standing for each chip maker could not work?
something like:
each chip > best of each brand > global best.
-
no, the "E" indicates a "coppermine" core and "B" indicates 133mhz fsb, so there's a big difference
just look at the multi.
p3 600e ->coppermine, 100mhz fsb
p3 600eb->coppermine, 133mhz fsb
as for the categories we'll look into this
Yea that work, if they were noted by FSB it would save confusion.
-
Your right kolian, but you should said there are 4 chips listed. It's easy to think 370 and slot 1 with out looking (and i didn't look
)Pentium 3 600Mhz <--------- coppermine
Pentium 3 600Mhz Katmai
Pentium 3 600Mhz s370 <---- coppermine
Pentium 3 600Mhz Slot 1
These are the sockets, if it's any different it would need to be FC-PGA2. This has usually heat spreader on top something like the p4 chips but i think they started around 1ghz area.
Pentium III Katmai in SECC2 package (450 - 600 MHz)
Pentium III Coppermine in SECC2 package (500 - 1133 MHz)
Pentium III Coppermine (FC-PGA and FC-PGA2) (500 MHz - 1133 MHz)
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=475956
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=453388
looks like nothing more that a stepping/revision difference.
-
Could that be runs with one chip and then with 2 chips in the board.
-
I see this:
-
but... on opera browser your site is unredible and i ve to revert to firefox to see anything
I use opera on it jmke. Up to 1280x1024 the shrimp site looks flawless, it also feels a bit quicker in oprea.
Jurek, you sure you haven't changed a setting somewhere?
-
Look in the socket column its "fcpga". each type can be a very different thing to overclock.
-
Looks like thats addition of cpu-z screen shot too, a little confusing especially if they didn't add both at the same time.
-
13 May 2008 10:08 insufficient verification (crew) jmke insufficient verification for rankings (Since 17/10/2007 use of GPU-Z is mandatory for 3D benchmarks screenshots http://hwbot.org/hwbot.post.do?postId=717)
he does show the rule date in that one, is it not correct?
-
I think you need to "set it public" so we can see the score.
-
bot was parsing the motherboard's description "EVGA X58 3X SLI"
So "3X SLI" has been removed from all his submissions.
Just the SuperPi and WPrime benches left to resolve.
Thanks!
-
here is another one, bot is setting it as sli
<hwbot> 15027 - 8800gtx - Core i7 Extreme 965 @ 4462.5mhz on Jinu Phase - EVGA X58 3X SLI </hwbot>
-
5. wPrime 1024m - 2min 57sec 310ms - Buckeye (411Overkill.com) - (unknown, cpuid 'Core i7 Extreme 965' on SS)
20 points - [ inspect ] - [ compare ]
6. SuperPi 32m - 9min 8sec 910ms - Buckeye (411Overkill.com) - (unknown, cpuid '4x Core i7 Extreme 965' on SS)
7.4 points - [ inspect ] - [ compare ]
forced a update but It's Still not taking the chip right off the site.
-
<hwbot> 9.375 - Core i7 Extreme 965 @ 4462.5mhz on Jinu Phase - EVGA X58 3X SLI </hwbot>
Could you also check this one, it's returning "unknown, cpuid" in both SuperPi and WPrime benches.
Thanks!
-
Am i missing something k404 one of those two guys isn't on a team?
-
Our member is submitting trough the forum as far as i know. Here's the last scan time and his submissions seem ok.
generated by hwbot - http://www.hwbot.org - info@hwbot.org
Last edited by HWBot on 30 Dec 2008, 09:21, edited 249 times in total.
do you want me to do a extra scan?
-
Thanks jmke!
-
lol... 40 points and 2 gold cups
-
"9800GX2 SLI" returns it as "2x Radeon 9800 mobility"
can you have a look at the Radeon 9800 mobility area?
** edit It's picking up some old scores and resubmitting them there too?
Proposed functionality: people who do not participate in the hwboints league
in General overclocking
Posted
I voted the same, i can't think of a good reason to do this at all?