Crew Strunkenbold Posted April 1, 2015 Crew Posted April 1, 2015 (edited) Move to BGA479: Celeron M 205 Celeron M 215 Celeron M 310 Celeron M 318 Celeron M 353 Celeron M 373 Celeron M 800Mhz Core 2 Duo U2400 Core 2 Duo U2500 Core L2300 (1.5Ghz) Core L2400 (1.66Ghz) Core L2500 (1.83Ghz) Pentium M 758 Pentium M 753 Pentium M 738 Pentium M 723 Pentium M 733 Pentium M 733J Pentium M 773 Pentium M 778 Pentium M LV 1.1 GHz Pentium M LV 1.2 GHz Pentium M LV 1.3 GHz (718) Pentium M ULV 0.9 GHz Pentium M ULV 1.0 GHz Pentium M ULV 1.1 GHz (713) Move to BGA953: Core 2 Duo SU2300 Core 2 Duo SU2700 Core 2 U3300 (1.2Ghz) Core 2 U3500 (1.4Ghz) Core 2 U9300 (1.2Ghz) Core 2 U9400 (1.4Ghz) Core Solo U1300 (1.06Ghz) Core Solo U1400 (1.2Ghz) Core Solo U1500 (1.33Ghz) Move to Socket P: Core 2 T9400 (2.53Ghz) Rename: Pentium M LV 1.1 Ghz to Pentium M 1.1Ghz LV Pentium M LV 1.2 Ghz to Pentium M 1.2Ghz LV Pentium M LV 1.3 GHz (718) to Pentium M 1.3Ghz LV (718) Pentium M ULV 0.9 Ghz to Pentium M 900Mhz ULV Pentium M ULV 1.0 Ghz to Pentium M 1.0Ghz ULV Pentium M ULV 1.1 GHz (713) to Pentium M 1.1Ghz ULV (ULV) Core 2 U3300 (1.2Ghz) to Core 2 Solo SU3300 (1.2Ghz) Core 2 U3500 (1.4Ghz) to Core 2 Solo SU3500 (1.4Ghz) Core 2 U9300 (1.2Ghz) to Core 2 Duo SU9300 (1.2Ghz) Core 2 U9400 (1.4Ghz) to Core 2 Duo SU9400 (1.4Ghz) Core L2300 (1.5Ghz) to Core Duo L2300 (1.5Ghz) Core L2400 (1.66Ghz) to Core Duo L2400 (1.66Ghz) Core L2500 (1.83Ghz) to Core Duo L2500 (1.83Ghz) Celeron M 350 to Celeron M 350 B1 Celeron M 350J to Celeron M 350J B1 Celeron M 360 to Celeron M 360 B1 Celeron M 360J to Celeron M 360J C0 Pentium M 715 to Pentium M 715 B1 Pentium M 715A to Pentium M 715A C0 Pentium M 725 to Pentium M 725 B1 Pentium M 725A to Pentium M 725A C0 Pentium M 735 to Pentium M 735 B1 Pentium M 735A to Pentium M 735A C0 Merge: Pentium M 745 and Pentium M 745A As its seems that there are also C0 revisions of M 745, there is no way to distinguish. Hope everything is right... Edited April 1, 2015 by Strunkenbold Quote
Crew Antinomy Posted April 7, 2015 Crew Posted April 7, 2015 O.K., moved all CPUs to their appropriate sockets. Renamed Core-based CPUs. I don't agree renaming LV/ULV Pentium M's because the way it's now is more common and like it is on intel.com. As for adding revisions to Celeron M 3xx/Pentium M 7x5 I remember it being a tricky one. Will read datasheets on what the differences are besides stepping. Feel free to poke me from time to time Quote
Crew Strunkenbold Posted April 7, 2015 Author Crew Posted April 7, 2015 The more I dig into this the more I understand that there is a big difference between what CPU-Z is detecting and all other Internet databases. If I could I would fix this in CPU-Z but Im not sure if this is even technical possible. Im totally with you having our db correct like CPU World or Intel site would make everything a lot easier and more correct. So now just 4 fun a common issue in our db: User submits a result with some old CPU, CPU-Z tells him: Pentium M with 1Ghz and socket 479 When he try to submit using the autocompletion he gets nothing because there is no Pentium M 1000Mhz or Pentium M 1,0Ghz. So he ends up searching the right one in the db and when he is lucky enough he might select Pentium M ULV 1,0Ghz as the correct one. This might be successful but is this really necessary? What do we gain by this? Detection of CPU-Z is really that bad as I dont even detects a Pentium M 723 like here. So it gets in the wrong category. So maybe we could do every user a favor and make our name styling a little more CPU-Z friendly even if its not 100% correct. So in this both cases I would propose: Pentium M 1,0Ghz ULV (Banias) Pentium M 1,0Ghz ULV (723) just my 2c Quote
Crew Antinomy Posted April 7, 2015 Crew Posted April 7, 2015 The better way is to compile a list of such bugs for a certain CPU family and send to F. Delattre (author of CPU-Z). You can post here, I'll think what can be done with it. Quote
Crew Strunkenbold Posted April 8, 2015 Author Crew Posted April 8, 2015 Right, it is more correct to report those bugs. Will see how it can be done. But I just see so many bugs, I dont where to start and when I should have time for this. Quote
mr.paco Posted April 8, 2015 Posted April 8, 2015 I just gotta say; You 2 guys make a helluva tag team... Definitely keep up the great work. Quote
Crew Antinomy Posted April 8, 2015 Crew Posted April 8, 2015 (edited) Thanks, Frank. I do clean up the database when I have free time (almost never that is ) but I definitely can't see everything. Strunkenbold, I usually clean them one category by one. Starting from old school and moving to the more recent ones. Better small fixes per week than giant fixes per ..never Edited April 8, 2015 by Antinomy Quote
Crew Strunkenbold Posted April 9, 2015 Author Crew Posted April 9, 2015 Strunkenbold, I usually clean them one category by one. Starting from old school and moving to the more recent ones. Better small fixes per week than giant fixes per ..never Didnt know that your are already clean up db by yourself... So your next task is probably cleaning Socket 3 section for oldschool competition? Oh and thank you Mr. Paco. Quote
Crew Antinomy Posted April 9, 2015 Crew Posted April 9, 2015 Didnt know that your are already clean up db by yourself...The base is too big to see the fixes. And big enough to see mistakes here and there I'll check socket 3 today. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.