Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Socket 479 fixes


Strunkenbold

Recommended Posts

  • Crew

Move to BGA479:

Celeron M 205

Celeron M 215

Celeron M 310

Celeron M 318

Celeron M 353

Celeron M 373

Celeron M 800Mhz

Core 2 Duo U2400

Core 2 Duo U2500

Core L2300 (1.5Ghz)

Core L2400 (1.66Ghz)

Core L2500 (1.83Ghz)

Pentium M 758

Pentium M 753

Pentium M 738

Pentium M 723

Pentium M 733

Pentium M 733J

Pentium M 773

Pentium M 778

Pentium M LV 1.1 GHz

Pentium M LV 1.2 GHz

Pentium M LV 1.3 GHz (718)

Pentium M ULV 0.9 GHz

Pentium M ULV 1.0 GHz

Pentium M ULV 1.1 GHz (713)

 

Move to BGA953:

Core 2 Duo SU2300

Core 2 Duo SU2700

Core 2 U3300 (1.2Ghz)

Core 2 U3500 (1.4Ghz)

Core 2 U9300 (1.2Ghz)

Core 2 U9400 (1.4Ghz)

Core Solo U1300 (1.06Ghz)

Core Solo U1400 (1.2Ghz)

Core Solo U1500 (1.33Ghz)

 

Move to Socket P:

Core 2 T9400 (2.53Ghz)

 

Rename:

Pentium M LV 1.1 Ghz to Pentium M 1.1Ghz LV

Pentium M LV 1.2 Ghz to Pentium M 1.2Ghz LV

Pentium M LV 1.3 GHz (718) to Pentium M 1.3Ghz LV (718)

Pentium M ULV 0.9 Ghz to Pentium M 900Mhz ULV

Pentium M ULV 1.0 Ghz to Pentium M 1.0Ghz ULV

Pentium M ULV 1.1 GHz (713) to Pentium M 1.1Ghz ULV (ULV)

Core 2 U3300 (1.2Ghz) to Core 2 Solo SU3300 (1.2Ghz)

Core 2 U3500 (1.4Ghz) to Core 2 Solo SU3500 (1.4Ghz)

Core 2 U9300 (1.2Ghz) to Core 2 Duo SU9300 (1.2Ghz)

Core 2 U9400 (1.4Ghz) to Core 2 Duo SU9400 (1.4Ghz)

Core L2300 (1.5Ghz) to Core Duo L2300 (1.5Ghz)

Core L2400 (1.66Ghz) to Core Duo L2400 (1.66Ghz)

Core L2500 (1.83Ghz) to Core Duo L2500 (1.83Ghz)

Celeron M 350 to Celeron M 350 B1

Celeron M 350J to Celeron M 350J B1

Celeron M 360 to Celeron M 360 B1

Celeron M 360J to Celeron M 360J C0

Pentium M 715 to Pentium M 715 B1

Pentium M 715A to Pentium M 715A C0

Pentium M 725 to Pentium M 725 B1

Pentium M 725A to Pentium M 725A C0

Pentium M 735 to Pentium M 735 B1

Pentium M 735A to Pentium M 735A C0

 

Merge:

Pentium M 745 and Pentium M 745A

As its seems that there are also C0 revisions of M 745, there is no way to distinguish.

 

Hope everything is right...

Edited by Strunkenbold
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew

O.K., moved all CPUs to their appropriate sockets. Renamed Core-based CPUs. I don't agree renaming LV/ULV Pentium M's because the way it's now is more common and like it is on intel.com. As for adding revisions to Celeron M 3xx/Pentium M 7x5 I remember it being a tricky one. Will read datasheets on what the differences are besides stepping.

 

Feel free to poke me from time to time ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew

The more I dig into this the more I understand that there is a big difference between what CPU-Z is detecting and all other Internet databases. If I could I would fix this in CPU-Z but Im not sure if this is even technical possible.

Im totally with you having our db correct like CPU World or Intel site would make everything a lot easier and more correct.

So now just 4 fun a common issue in our db:

User submits a result with some old CPU,

CPU-Z tells him: Pentium M with 1Ghz and socket 479

When he try to submit using the autocompletion he gets nothing because there is no Pentium M 1000Mhz or Pentium M 1,0Ghz. So he ends up searching the right one in the db and when he is lucky enough he might select Pentium M ULV 1,0Ghz as the correct one. This might be successful but is this really necessary? What do we gain by this?

Detection of CPU-Z is really that bad as I dont even detects a Pentium M 723 like here. So it gets in the wrong category.

So maybe we could do every user a favor and make our name styling a little more CPU-Z friendly even if its not 100% correct.

So in this both cases I would propose:

Pentium M 1,0Ghz ULV (Banias)

Pentium M 1,0Ghz ULV (723)

 

just my 2c

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew

Thanks, Frank. I do clean up the database when I have free time (almost never that is :D) but I definitely can't see everything.

 

Strunkenbold, I usually clean them one category by one. Starting from old school and moving to the more recent ones. Better small fixes per week than giant fixes per ..never :D

Edited by Antinomy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew

Strunkenbold, I usually clean them one category by one. Starting from old school and moving to the more recent ones. Better small fixes per week than giant fixes per ..never :D

 

Didnt know that your are already clean up db by yourself...

So your next task is probably cleaning Socket 3 section for oldschool competition? :D

 

 

Oh and thank you Mr. Paco.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...