no important information is covered up here....

[ny_driver]

Obviously an honest mistake, not a case of intended deception, and it can be easily seen that it's a 3200+ Venice. The claimed processor speed(3110MHz)which can also be seen in the wprime tab isn't really the score here....this isn't a cpuz submission.

 

Why has the score been blocked? Apparently someone got upset when I crushed their score.

 

I can easily duplicate that score, but I don't really feel like hooking that system back up any time soon.

 

Here look for yourself.......

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2150760_ny_driver_wprime_1024m_athlon_64_3200_venice_s939_26min_45sec_922ms

 

 

And why can't I see the first paragraph of my post?

[Turrican]

it got blocked because ->

insufficient verification (The screenshot app is blocking vital parts of the CPU tab.)

[Christian Ney]

yep your screenshot is a bit damaged

 

Obviously an honest mistake, not a case of intended deception, and it can be easily seen that it's a 3200+ Venice. The claimed processor speed(3110MHz)which can also be seen in the wprime tab isn't really the score here....this isn't a cpuz submission.

Edited April 7, 2011 by Christian Ney

[ny_driver]

I know why.

 

I just think it's pretty clear that their was no deception intended and that the score is accurate.

 

The part of the cpuz that is covered up......all it says is the processor speed which isn't even important and it can be seen in the wprime tab.

 

Just seems to me like someone whos score got beat is crying about it.

[Christian Ney]

do you still have the rig ?

 

Can you rebench it again ?

Edited April 7, 2011 by Christian Ney
hide signature

[ny_driver]

Sure, I only benched it a couple days ago. I can beat that score no problem.

I have hooked up a different system now.

I'm working with the 920DO until I get some more 939 cpus.

[Christian Ney]

ok if it's ok for you to rebench it it yould be nice

 

If not maybe I can try to reason knopflerbruce

[ny_driver]

Thanks, I'll re-bench it pretty soon.

 

I have another problem now though......I just submitted a wp32m score with my 920 for 14.3 points, and my score only went up ~6 points.

 

I don't understand.

 

Can you please explain?

Edited April 7, 2011 by ny_driver
correction

[Massman]

Did you already have a score with that 920?

 

If your previous 920 score was worth ~ 8p and your current score ~ 14p, you go up by 6p.

[TheDarkN8]

Crusher, cpu speed is pretty vital in a benchmark without a validation file to coincide with it.

 

Regarding your wp32m score, do you have a previous quad core wpr32m submission that provided points? Then subtract that previous submissions points from 14.3 and you'll likely be left with the difference of 6 points. The wp32m rankings go by number of cores. You can recieve additional team points by doing well in the particular category of processor I believe. I haven't submitted in a while and things have changed so I may be mistaken.

 

You can't see the first paragraph of the post because of the way this vbulletin software is working. The work around I use is clicking advanced in the post quick reply portion of the thread and then it lists all the posts including the invisible one.

 

Hope this post was helpful, good luck.

[ny_driver]

Did you already have a score with that 920?

 

If your previous 920 score was worth ~ 8p and your current score ~ 14p, you go up by 6p.

 

No that is my 1st wprime submission with the 920.

[knopflerbruce]

Sure, I only benched it a couple days ago. I can beat that score no problem.

I have hooked up a different system now.

I'm working with the 920DO until I get some more 939 cpus.

 

I saw it was a recent score and that's one reason that I blocked it (easy to rebench). FYI, wprime frequency isn't realtime, so it's not accurate (you can raise the clocks after opening wprime).

 

I agree that the score is not suspicious, but it's a decent score and it'll get a few views then it looks better if it's done properly, right?

[ny_driver]

That is my 1st quad core wprime32 submission and the 1st with the 920 also.

 

Good reasoning knopflerbruce, I agree.

 

Thanks.

[Christian Ney]

I saw it was a recent score and that's one reason that I blocked it (easy to rebench). FYI, wprime frequency isn't realtime, so it's not accurate (you can raise the clocks after opening wprime).

 

I agree that the score is not suspicious, but it's a decent score and it'll get a few views then it looks better if it's done properly, right?

 

 

How can I argue with that

 

You gave the reason

 

you are now on my best moderators list,

if you weren't already

[Christian Ney]

That is my 1st quad core wprime32 submission and the 1st with the 920 also.

 

 

 

It's because you were already having a 8 pts i7 920 submission

 

then you got 6 more points cause : 6 + 8 => 14

[ny_driver]

That's weird I don't recall entering a wp32 score before, and I don't delete old entries until I beat the score.

I don't see the entry in my submissions.

Oh well......thanks

[Christian Ney]

Here is it if you want to delete it :

 

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2130780_ny_driver_wprime_32m_core_i7_920_5sec_327ms

[ny_driver]

Thanks again.

[knopflerbruce]

How can I argue with that

 

You gave the reason

 

you are now on my best moderators list,

if you weren't already

 

Too bad I'm too lazy too often:p