June 7, 201114 yr Hi George, I have all kinds of wierd problems with this board but it seems ok running with tRCD at 9 With my first board, the Rev B2 before I swapped out for this B3, it was ok running tRCD at 8 (6-8-6-24),on the 1:8 divider. Now though Im not sure if my chip and / or ram are degrading ( I have been taking it very easy on them , imc has never been above 1.35v ) or possibly need to go back to an older bios. Have you been having problems with it George?
June 8, 201114 yr Author Yeap but I've tried everything and still can't run tRCD 9. I've tried Beta BIOSes, I've tried to much I/O (VTT) voltage, subtimings tweaking, everything! Maybe it's my RAMs, who knows?
June 8, 201114 yr Hmm this is interesting, we just had a memory comp at OCN and some of us couldnt push bclk any higher than 101bclk on the 1:8 divider while others could reach 105bclk easily. I thought this was due to different sets of ram being better and / or good imc.But after your comment about problems with tRCD running at 9 I just anilized the results more closley and noticed that all the guys who can achieve over 101bclk on the 1:8 divider have had to use tRCD at 10. I think I need to test this and speek to some of those guys to see if they have problems with tRCD 9
June 9, 201114 yr Author Make sure you do that I have exams now so I cant push more, but I'll try again after the 25th. I'll try Hypers as well and see if I have any luck
June 9, 201114 yr Well using tRCD 10 does allow me to achieve higher bclk on the 1:8 divider, my current result in the bclk class is at 107 on that divider Good luck in your exams George
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.