K404 Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 3DM01 results possibly obtained using mipmap- natures FPS are way too high http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=698991 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696596 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697378 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=706411 The last one might be alright because of the GDDR clocks??? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manos_ir Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 also... in this one : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703591 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703429 the cpu can be anyone athlon 64 3400+ ( there is no prof that is Clawhammer ) and this one..... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570544 has no verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649514 no cpu-z (deleted in the past but strikes back) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661126 - suspicious result(some guys clocks their Celeron s478 2.4GHz up to 3.4-3.5GHz and got ~71..71.5s; but there is only 3.164GHz and 70.38s.. perfect tweak? I don't think so.. perhaps, it's PiFast 4.3) Please check it.. fixed. p.s. It`s not PiFast 4.3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 why you didn't fix these ones? also...... in this one : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685251 how can we see if it is the right card????? fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veld Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Demiurg, ok.. sorry for trouble.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 also... in this one : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703591http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703429 the cpu can be anyone athlon 64 3400+ ( there is no prof that is Clawhammer ) and this one..... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570544 has no verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649514 no cpu-z (deleted in the past but strikes back) fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Demiurg, ok.. sorry for trouble.. No problem at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manos_ir Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 how you are proving that aquamark runs on the correct vga ...without a gpu-z ? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685251 i would like to understand it ! because you don't ask gpu-z in aquamark... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DopeLex Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=707593 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=708271 Both wrong category -> not "GMA 965" but "Radeon 3870 crossfire" and/or "Radeon 3870x2 crossfire" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695761 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 how you are proving that aquamark runs on the correct vga ...without a gpu-z ? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685251 i would like to understand it ! because you don't ask gpu-z in aquamark... Now I cannot require from one what it is not required from all. We shall correct it shortly, be patient Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=707593http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=708271 Both wrong category -> not "GMA 965" but "Radeon 3870 crossfire" and/or "Radeon 3870x2 crossfire" Blocked as incorrect submission. It was impossble to fix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695761 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708332 - matched to wrong videocard http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691314 - needs more proof http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691909 - needs more proof http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693721 - needs more proof http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697818 - needs more proof: PCMark05 score with only SuperPi on screen http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702863 - needs more proof: "N/A PCMark" on screen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708332 - matched to wrong videocardhttp://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691314 - needs more proof http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691909 - needs more proof http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693721 - needs more proof http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697818 - needs more proof: PCMark05 score with only SuperPi on screen http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702863 - needs more proof: "N/A PCMark" on screen fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 1 MONTH AGO I ASKED TO FIX IT. Still no reaction!!! Category - Pentium-3 533 MHz Slot1 Katmai. http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1433 user with name spud107 (Techpowerup) use his P-3 600 MHz to make tests and put it into this category. cpu-z - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674717 pi fast - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674725 spi1m - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674720 wprime32 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674723 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 wrong version of wPrime for result, posted after 1/1/2008: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697561 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697427 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 1 MONTH AGO I ASKED TO FIX IT.Still no reaction!!! Category - Pentium-3 533 MHz Slot1 Katmai. http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1433 user with name spud107 (Techpowerup) use his P-3 600 MHz to make tests and put it into this category. cpu-z - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674717 pi fast - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674725 spi1m - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674720 wprime32 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674723 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 wrong version of wPrime for result, posted after 1/1/2008: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697561 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697427 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Sweet Posted March 7, 2008 Crew Share Posted March 7, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=586204 checksum: 1563D883 (invalid) No verification link... Thank's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
intouch Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 Can you please move this score in the good video card category ? The link shows an NVS140M not an NVS135 ! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702446 Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=586204 checksum: 1563D883 (invalid) No verification link... Thank's fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 Can you please move this score in the good video card category ?The link shows an NVS140M not an NVS135 ! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702446 Thanks fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Sweet Posted March 7, 2008 Crew Share Posted March 7, 2008 It's this correct ??? I don't understand Same Nick, same hardware, diferent Team, in the 3Dmark '01, .... and score It is almost the same of this bench http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=551667 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=607902 In 3DMark '03 : Here same score, same HardWare, same Nick, and diferent Team http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=545599 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=545587 It's this Ok??? Thank's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manos_ir Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583862'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583862 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569978'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569978 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569978 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578142 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583862 no proofs if i remeber well new scores needs also gpu-z..... right? ---> http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707999 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts