71proste Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 any news about this? Good question,such important case and no answer:confused::confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702686 pifast error Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sacha35 Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 Ok Guys after having my results pulled in Wprime for incorrect version today I benched with Wprime version 1.55 as you require for this to be valid. I ran my QX9650 and submitted the results directly to Wprime whom then upload to yourself, on looking at my results you can see that this version of Wprime has bugs in it as it is seeing my QX9650 CPU as an E6850, there would be no way in the world I could have hit these scores with a duel core CPU. I think this should be looked into as said I have done everything by the Hwbot book and with version 1.55 and this is wrong, my times and results are right by the QX9650 CPU, but this version of Wprime is incorrect as it is not seeing the right CPU or speed. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717122 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaJ0r Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=716987 please delete this result. Reason SLI, not a single video. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653076it is also flashed 6600GT DDR3 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 same result / validation submitted by 2 different membershttp://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=599420 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675137 partially fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708451please check this result, too higth score looking to others the same I think it is just iRam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=716604 category- 6800XT, NV41. Never gonna pull that score with an Opto 185 @ 3GHz and low GPU clocks! blocked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 PiFast http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=716736 *Error in computation* date 29-03-2008 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702686 pifast error fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=716987 please delete this result. Reason SLI, not a single video. fixed Why we should delete it? May be moving into right category is better way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 Ok Guys after having my results pulled in Wprime for incorrect version today I benched with Wprime version 1.55 as you require for this to be valid. I ran my QX9650 and submitted the results directly to Wprime whom then upload to yourself, on looking at my results you can see that this version of Wprime has bugs in it as it is seeing my QX9650 CPU as an E6850, there would be no way in the world I could have hit these scores with a duel core CPU. I think this should be looked into as said I have done everything by the Hwbot book and with version 1.55 and this is wrong, my times and results are right by the QX9650 CPU, but this version of Wprime is incorrect as it is not seeing the right CPU or speed. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717122 Why do not you just fix mismatched CPU manually? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Svikens Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 Its not only 1.55 bug. When runing wprime 1.55 under Vista its work only with one core. But 1.58 works fine with Vista. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sacha35 Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 Why do not you just fix mismatched CPU manually? Hi there and thank you for the reply, this system bench was submitted directly online using the upload link directly to Wprime, if the software is the correct version as you guys require then this should have been able to check my results and upload the correct score naming the correct CPU. I think this should be looked into as this would be very easy for other members and teams to run a slower clock speed with a quad core CPU and upload them as it sees a duel core. Also I see you have fixed my Wprime 32m time by putting this in the right section of CPU of which I have asked to be done but why have you now removed my Wprime 1024 system bench instead of putting this in the right CPU section, I am not cheating or hiding anything as I am the one who has reported this bug with Wprime version 1.55, therefore could you please correct the CPU for this Wprime system bench and please reinstate this back for me as I have done everything to the book as HWbot require using version 1.55 of Wprime and have uploaded my results directly using the upload link to Wprime. Many Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 Also I see you have fixed my Wprime 32m time by putting this in the right section of CPU of which I have asked to be done but why have you now removed my Wprime 1024 system bench instead of putting this in the right CPU section, I am not cheating or hiding anything as I am the one who has reported this bug with Wprime version 1.55, therefore could you please correct the CPU for this Wprime system bench and please reinstate this back for me as I have done everything to the book as HWbot require using version 1.55 of Wprime and have uploaded my results directly using the upload link to Wprime. Many Thanks I didn`t do anything at all with your result in wPrime 1024. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabski Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 wrong score http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=673549 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 wrong score http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=673549 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veld Posted April 1, 2008 Share Posted April 1, 2008 insufficient verifications for rankings http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717081 - GPU-Z screen is absent http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717468 - GPU-Z screen is absent http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717481 - GPU-Z screen is absent Please check this.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mAlkAv!An Posted April 1, 2008 Share Posted April 1, 2008 Thorton in Thoroughbred category: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694260 Barton in Thorton category: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640766 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikodemus Posted April 1, 2008 Share Posted April 1, 2008 wPrime v1.55 mandatory: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717527 wPrime v1.28 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veld Posted April 1, 2008 Share Posted April 1, 2008 wPrime 1.58 after 1/1/08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702985 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702987 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kim55 Posted April 1, 2008 Share Posted April 1, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695215 - Bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=704840 - Bad screen Full Lol )) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manos_ir Posted April 1, 2008 Share Posted April 1, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708386 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709697 GPU-Z isn't necessary for new results? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628359 no orb ! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=712284 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=664994 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604859 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575569 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=613753 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=613220 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604192 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713661 no memory tab of cpu-z(necessary) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609129 no cpu-z at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 1, 2008 Share Posted April 1, 2008 insufficient verifications for rankingshttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717081 - GPU-Z screen is absent http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717468 - GPU-Z screen is absent http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717481 - GPU-Z screen is absent Please check this.. fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 1, 2008 Share Posted April 1, 2008 Thorton in Thoroughbred category:http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694260 Barton in Thorton category: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640766 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts