Wrong Result

[password problem]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=579329

Not description and i think bad cpu.

[manos_ir]

Let's be more constructive!

Please show me which category I should moved in those results.

i got your point........

 

do whatever you think it's right.... !

 

i hope you can understand why i make so much noise....

because of rules.... and i think we must follow them !

[demiurg]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615990 orb links broken

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621042

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660985

 

fixed

[jowi69]

Scores submitted after 01-01-2008 and wPrime version is 1.58 or other, not 1.55:

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695963

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577026 no verification

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693280

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693914

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708024

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695461 invalid no screenshot

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696385

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700239'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700239

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700239

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693281

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691655

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686730

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692302

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696293

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713702 ?????

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=712420 ?????

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694502

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695363

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685678

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687069

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713707

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695229

[manos_ir]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=620593 no orb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578142 this one says invalid but still have points...

[Sweet]

Plese Fix this wrong score:

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=547463 No screen, no verification , maybe fake ??

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=547510 Idem Previous

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569187 Idem "

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=550039 Idem "

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648583 No resolution

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562652 No screen , broke ORB...no data

 

WPrime 1024m: All Invalid Checksum - Results invalid

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691655 Invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583695 Invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=586232 Invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569688 Invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588453 Invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578117 Invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=568236 Invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581500 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577450 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569976 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569975 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570178 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683320 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566518 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=579575 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659269 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706958 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572553 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567815 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591482 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643271 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580527 Invalid Checksum

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627598 No screen, no validation, nothing,.....

 

WPrime 1024 : All incorrect version of W.Prime old version after 01-01-2008

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695363 Date 03-02-2008 Wrong Wprime v 1.43 (1.55 mandatory 01-01-2008)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686080 Data 09-01-2008 Wprime v.1.54 (v1.55 mandatory)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690206 Data 21-01-2008 WPrime v1.41 (v1.55 mandatory )

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707905 Data 05-03-2008 WPrime v1.54 (v1.55 mandatory)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692415 Date 26-01-2008 WPrime v1.54 (v1.55 mandatory)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694053 Date 30-01-2008 WPrime 1.53 (v1.55 Mandatory)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689828 Date 20-01-2008 Wprime 1.54 (v.1.55 Mnadatory)

 

 

Thanks Demirug, (Gracias por tu trabajo in Spanish -Thank you for your hard work in English)

[Nikodemus]

All these results are submitted as Sempron 3000+ (Athlon XP), but according to descriptions or screenshots they are not. Athlon XP based Sempron is of course Socket A type with Barton core.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650932 Description says DFI NF4 Ultra-D >> Socket 939

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668286 Description says Sempron 64

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587434 Description says Sempron 64

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587460 Description says Sempron 64

[Svikens]

All these results are submitted as Sempron 3000+ (Athlon XP), but according to descriptions or screenshots they are not. Athlon XP based Sempron is of course Socket A type with Barton core.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650932 Description says DFI NF4 Ultra-D >> Socket 939

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668286 Description says Sempron 64

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587434 Description says Sempron 64

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587460 Description says Sempron 64

 

 

LOL in screenshot they have E6600

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668286

[sacha35]

Hi there just received a mail to say this bench has been marked as 'incorrect submission:

 

This entry http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693914

Has been deleted by crew member, NeoForce, so it is impossible for me or anyone else to check to make sure this is correct as I am only taking the word of NeoForce.

 

In future can we please have access to these reported incorrect scores so that we and others can check them before they are removed?

 

It is not a problem as I will just rebench this as this score was easy to get, the problem though is having score removed so we have no access to seeing them and checking to see if they are wrong or not.

[demiurg]

wPrime version not 1.55 posted after 01/01/2008

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694978

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693850

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697351

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=704723

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698280

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697405

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696201

 

fixed

[demiurg]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687666 flashed Videocard

 

The Quadro FX540 have only DDR (275Mhz/DDR550) and not GDDR3 (550Mhz/DDR1100)

http://www.nvidia.de/object/IO_11761_de.html

 

fixed

[demiurg]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=579329

Not description and i think bad cpu.

 

fixed

[demiurg]

Scores submitted after 01-01-2008 and wPrime version is 1.58 or other, not 1.55:

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695963

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577026 no verification

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693280

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693914

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708024

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695461 invalid no screenshot

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696385

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700239'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700239

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700239

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693281

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691655

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686730

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692302

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696293

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713702 ?????

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=712420 ?????

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694502

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695363

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685678

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687069

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713707

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695229

 

fixed

[S_A_V]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706377

1. This result in global top20, but verification link is broken

2. 248Mb/s in XP Startup is too high, even for 3xIRAM. Ramdisk?

[demiurg]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=620593 no orb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578142 this one says invalid but still have points...

 

checked and fixed

[Veld]

wPrime 1.58 after 1/1/08

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706979

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706982

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686791

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708619

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709839

[71proste]

This is not 6200TC64,i think it's a TC128 version

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714698

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714704

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714713

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714746

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714691

 

btw:what is the answer about the results uploaded by hipro5@gprhellas's ???It's almost two weeks already without any news?????

http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=512&page=134 post 1340

[demiurg]

Plese Fix this wrong score:

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=547463 No screen, no verification , maybe fake ??

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=547510 Idem Previous

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569187 Idem "

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=550039 Idem "

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648583 No resolution

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562652 No screen , broke ORB...no data

 

WPrime 1024m: All Invalid Checksum - Results invalid

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691655 Invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583695 Invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=586232 Invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569688 Invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588453 Invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578117 Invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=568236 Invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581500 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577450 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569976 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569975 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570178 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683320 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566518 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=579575 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659269 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706958 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572553 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567815 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591482 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643271 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580527 Invalid Checksum

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627598 No screen, no validation, nothing,.....

 

WPrime 1024 : All incorrect version of W.Prime old version after 01-01-2008

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695363 Date 03-02-2008 Wrong Wprime v 1.43 (1.55 mandatory 01-01-2008)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686080 Data 09-01-2008 Wprime v.1.54 (v1.55 mandatory)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690206 Data 21-01-2008 WPrime v1.41 (v1.55 mandatory )

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707905 Data 05-03-2008 WPrime v1.54 (v1.55 mandatory)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692415 Date 26-01-2008 WPrime v1.54 (v1.55 mandatory)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694053 Date 30-01-2008 WPrime 1.53 (v1.55 Mandatory)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689828 Date 20-01-2008 Wprime 1.54 (v.1.55 Mnadatory)

 

 

Thanks Demirug, (Gracias por tu trabajo in Spanish -Thank you for your hard work in English)

 

fixed

 

Please pay attention to date of sending of result. Results are older than one year are not a subject to moderation!

[demiurg]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706377

1. This result in global top20, but verification link is broken

2. 248Mb/s in XP Startup is too high, even for 3xIRAM. Ramdisk?

 

fixed

[demiurg]

wPrime 1.58 after 1/1/08

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706979

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706982

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686791

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708619

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709839

 

fixed

[Nikodemus]

All these results are submitted as Sempron 3000+ (Athlon XP), but according to descriptions or screenshots they are not. Athlon XP based Sempron is of course Socket A type with Barton core.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650932 Description says DFI NF4 Ultra-D >> Socket 939

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668286 Description says Sempron 64

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587434 Description says Sempron 64

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587460 Description says Sempron 64

 

And more to come... sorry not to take care of these all at once

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668303 Screenshot shows Palermo S939

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668315 Screenshot shows Palermo S939

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668297 Link to forumpost says Sempron 64, screenshot link broken, but most likely also Palermo core

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668305 Description says Palermo S754

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668310 From link to forumpost you find a screenshot that shows Palermo S754

[demiurg]

This is not 6200TC64,i think it's a TC128 version

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714698

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714704

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714713

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714746

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714691

 

 

Why do you think so? It is almost impossible to see distinguish between TC64 and TC128 versions http://www.nvidia.com/page/geforce6200_pci

[71proste]

I'll show U the difference when I come back home(Today) couse I have 6200TC 64(with 64mb) at the moment

I had 3 of them(32,64 and 128TC)

but tell me please

what is the answer to my second question??(about same results uploaded)

[demiurg]

I'll show U the difference when I come back home(Today) couse I have 6200TC 64(with 64mb) at the moment

I had 3 of them(32,64 and 128TC)

but tell me please

what is the answer to my second question??(about same results uploaded)

 

I do not have answer to this question now.

[71proste]

Hmm I see,but who will answer and when??