Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted
Thaks! But I`m still thinking the results is OK.

You cannot set external card in notebook ;)

you keept a score......with no proffs......because you think......ok....if this is enough for a score in hwbot......then i think that we are all lossing our time here......

 

i show you the 0.0.6 gpu-z........that appears the correct name in this vga.....

but this is not enough for you.....

and you approve a test.....because you believe in something.........

 

 

my friend......you can change a vga in a notebook....

is not something so strange....in the rest world....

 

acer change the vga in my notebook.....

 

 

any way....... YOU BELIEVE......so there is no reason to try......you are from russia also....... so your friend is correct.... i'm sorry for loosing your time...

Posted
you keept a score......with no proffs......because you think......ok....if this is enough for a score in hwbot......then i think that we are all lossing our time here......

 

i show you the 0.0.6 gpu-z........that appears the correct name in this vga.....

but this is not enough for you.....

and you approve a test.....because you believe in something.........

 

 

my friend......you can change a vga in a notebook....

is not something so strange....in the rest world....

 

acer change the vga in my notebook.....

 

 

any way....... YOU BELIEVE......so there is no reason to try......you are from russia also....... so your friend is correct.... i'm sorry for loosing your time...

 

Please calm down.

First, there is the proofs.

Second, I`ve blocked result http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691536 It was carried out with not default resolution.

Third, ATI/AMD uses so many names for its videocard, it is easy to confuse.

Fourth, I do not even know this guy. When I moderate, I do not make a distinction by team!

Fifth, Roughness will not help!

Posted
Please calm down.

First, there is the proofs.

Second, I`ve blocked result http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691536 It was carried out with not default resolution.

Third, ATI/AMD uses so many names for its videocard, it is easy to confuse.

Fourth, I do not even know this guy. When I moderate, I do not make a distinction by team!

Fifth, Roughness will not help!

 

the reason i was pissed off :

you keep a score(5 actuall 01,03,05,06,aquamark) when the gpu-z shows that this is not the right card.....and after i prove you that this version of gpu-z says this card correct....i don't understand why his card is an exception.....

 

i have no problem with this guy but i can't understand how are you thinking....

maybe i cross the line....and i'm sorry for that.....

but please.....explain me why......

you ask some proffs at every test....right?

you have not this proffs but you still kept a score....

i don't care with what card this laptop is out at stores.....

i care about the rules.....and rules must be the same for everyone...

Posted

If it's validate directly on the site Wprime ,we can't to know the version of Wprime. It's should be the 1.58 but it's must the 1.55.

Thank's.

Why there's some score in the 7300SE with 128Mb of memory,but in description ,it's only 64Mb.

What's the good ?

Posted
the reason i was pissed off :

you keep a score(5 actuall 01,03,05,06,aquamark) when the gpu-z shows that this is not the right card.....and after i prove you that this version of gpu-z says this card correct....i don't understand why his card is an exception.....

 

i have no problem with this guy but i can't understand how are you thinking....

maybe i cross the line....and i'm sorry for that.....

but please.....explain me why......

you ask some proffs at every test....right?

you have not this proffs but you still kept a score....

i don't care with what card this laptop is out at stores.....

i care about the rules.....and rules must be the same for everyone...

 

Let's be more constructive!

Please show me which category I should moved in those results.

Posted
Let's be more constructive!

Please show me which category I should moved in those results.

i got your point........

 

do whatever you think it's right.... !

 

i hope you can understand why i make so much noise....

because of rules.... and i think we must follow them !

  • Crew
Posted

Plese Fix this wrong score:

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=547463 No screen, no verification , maybe fake ??

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=547510 Idem Previous

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569187 Idem "

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=550039 Idem "

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648583 No resolution

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562652 No screen , broke ORB...no data

 

WPrime 1024m: All Invalid Checksum - Results invalid

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691655 Invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583695 Invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=586232 Invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569688 Invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588453 Invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578117 Invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=568236 Invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581500 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577450 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569976 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569975 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570178 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683320 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566518 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=579575 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659269 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706958 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572553 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567815 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591482 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643271 Invalid Checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580527 Invalid Checksum

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627598 No screen, no validation, nothing,.....

 

WPrime 1024 : All incorrect version of W.Prime old version after 01-01-2008

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695363 Date 03-02-2008 Wrong Wprime v 1.43 (1.55 mandatory 01-01-2008)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686080 Data 09-01-2008 Wprime v.1.54 (v1.55 mandatory)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690206 Data 21-01-2008 WPrime v1.41 (v1.55 mandatory )

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707905 Data 05-03-2008 WPrime v1.54 (v1.55 mandatory)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692415 Date 26-01-2008 WPrime v1.54 (v1.55 mandatory)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694053 Date 30-01-2008 WPrime 1.53 (v1.55 Mandatory)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689828 Date 20-01-2008 Wprime 1.54 (v.1.55 Mnadatory)

 

 

Thanks Demirug, (Gracias por tu trabajo in Spanish -Thank you for your hard work in English)

Posted

All these results are submitted as Sempron 3000+ (Athlon XP), but according to descriptions or screenshots they are not. Athlon XP based Sempron is of course Socket A type with Barton core.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650932 Description says DFI NF4 Ultra-D >> Socket 939

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668286 Description says Sempron 64

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587434 Description says Sempron 64

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587460 Description says Sempron 64

Posted
All these results are submitted as Sempron 3000+ (Athlon XP), but according to descriptions or screenshots they are not. Athlon XP based Sempron is of course Socket A type with Barton core.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650932 Description says DFI NF4 Ultra-D >> Socket 939

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668286 Description says Sempron 64

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587434 Description says Sempron 64

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587460 Description says Sempron 64

 

 

LOL in screenshot they have E6600

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668286

Posted

Hi there just received a mail to say this bench has been marked as 'incorrect submission:

 

This entry http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693914

Has been deleted by crew member, NeoForce, so it is impossible for me or anyone else to check to make sure this is correct as I am only taking the word of NeoForce.

 

In future can we please have access to these reported incorrect scores so that we and others can check them before they are removed?

 

It is not a problem as I will just rebench this as this score was easy to get, the problem though is having score removed so we have no access to seeing them and checking to see if they are wrong or not.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...