demiurg Posted March 25, 2008 Posted March 25, 2008 Scores submitted after 01-01-2008 and wPrime version is 1.58 or other, not 1.55: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695963 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577026 no verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693280 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693914 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708024 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695461 invalid no screenshot http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696385 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700239'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700239 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700239 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693281 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691655 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686730 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692302 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696293 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713702 ????? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=712420 ????? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694502 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695363 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685678 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687069 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713707 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695229 fixed
S_A_V Posted March 25, 2008 Posted March 25, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706377 1. This result in global top20, but verification link is broken 2. 248Mb/s in XP Startup is too high, even for 3xIRAM. Ramdisk?
demiurg Posted March 25, 2008 Posted March 25, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=620593 no orb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578142 this one says invalid but still have points... checked and fixed
Veld Posted March 25, 2008 Posted March 25, 2008 wPrime 1.58 after 1/1/08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706979 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706982 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686791 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708619 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709839
71proste Posted March 25, 2008 Posted March 25, 2008 This is not 6200TC64,i think it's a TC128 version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714698 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714704 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714713 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714746 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714691 btw:what is the answer about the results uploaded by hipro5@gprhellas's ???It's almost two weeks already without any news????? http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=512&page=134 post 1340
demiurg Posted March 25, 2008 Posted March 25, 2008 Plese Fix this wrong score: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=547463 No screen, no verification , maybe fake ?? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=547510 Idem Previous http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569187 Idem " http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=550039 Idem " http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648583 No resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562652 No screen , broke ORB...no data WPrime 1024m: All Invalid Checksum - Results invalid http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691655 Invalid checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583695 Invalid checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=586232 Invalid checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569688 Invalid checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588453 Invalid checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578117 Invalid checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=568236 Invalid checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581500 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577450 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569976 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569975 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570178 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683320 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566518 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=579575 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659269 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706958 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572553 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567815 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591482 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643271 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580527 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627598 No screen, no validation, nothing,..... WPrime 1024 : All incorrect version of W.Prime old version after 01-01-2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695363 Date 03-02-2008 Wrong Wprime v 1.43 (1.55 mandatory 01-01-2008) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686080 Data 09-01-2008 Wprime v.1.54 (v1.55 mandatory) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690206 Data 21-01-2008 WPrime v1.41 (v1.55 mandatory ) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707905 Data 05-03-2008 WPrime v1.54 (v1.55 mandatory) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692415 Date 26-01-2008 WPrime v1.54 (v1.55 mandatory) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694053 Date 30-01-2008 WPrime 1.53 (v1.55 Mandatory) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689828 Date 20-01-2008 Wprime 1.54 (v.1.55 Mnadatory) Thanks Demirug, (Gracias por tu trabajo in Spanish -Thank you for your hard work in English) fixed Please pay attention to date of sending of result. Results are older than one year are not a subject to moderation!
demiurg Posted March 25, 2008 Posted March 25, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=7063771. This result in global top20, but verification link is broken 2. 248Mb/s in XP Startup is too high, even for 3xIRAM. Ramdisk? fixed
demiurg Posted March 25, 2008 Posted March 25, 2008 wPrime 1.58 after 1/1/08http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706979 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706982 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686791 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708619 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709839 fixed
Nikodemus Posted March 25, 2008 Posted March 25, 2008 All these results are submitted as Sempron 3000+ (Athlon XP), but according to descriptions or screenshots they are not. Athlon XP based Sempron is of course Socket A type with Barton core. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650932 Description says DFI NF4 Ultra-D >> Socket 939 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668286 Description says Sempron 64 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587434 Description says Sempron 64 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587460 Description says Sempron 64 And more to come... sorry not to take care of these all at once http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668303 Screenshot shows Palermo S939 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668315 Screenshot shows Palermo S939 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668297 Link to forumpost says Sempron 64, screenshot link broken, but most likely also Palermo core http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668305 Description says Palermo S754 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668310 From link to forumpost you find a screenshot that shows Palermo S754
demiurg Posted March 25, 2008 Posted March 25, 2008 This is not 6200TC64,i think it's a TC128 versionhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714698 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714704 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714713 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714746 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714691 Why do you think so? It is almost impossible to see distinguish between TC64 and TC128 versions http://www.nvidia.com/page/geforce6200_pci
71proste Posted March 25, 2008 Posted March 25, 2008 I'll show U the difference when I come back home(Today) couse I have 6200TC 64(with 64mb) at the moment I had 3 of them(32,64 and 128TC) but tell me please what is the answer to my second question??(about same results uploaded)
demiurg Posted March 25, 2008 Posted March 25, 2008 I'll show U the difference when I come back home(Today) couse I have 6200TC 64(with 64mb) at the moment I had 3 of them(32,64 and 128TC) but tell me please what is the answer to my second question??(about same results uploaded) I do not have answer to this question now.
manos_ir Posted March 25, 2008 Posted March 25, 2008 checked and fixed but still have points......... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578142
demiurg Posted March 25, 2008 Posted March 25, 2008 but still have points.........http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578142 Too old for moderation
Narmer Posted March 25, 2008 Posted March 25, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635962 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605415 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605413 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605414
zavlakas Posted March 25, 2008 Posted March 25, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713442 wPrime 1.40 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713373 wPrime 1.53 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713355 wPrime 1.54 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709764 Invalid checksum in wPrime
71proste Posted March 25, 2008 Posted March 25, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715115 no resolution and test details
Crew Sweet Posted March 25, 2008 Crew Posted March 25, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714874 **ERROR in computation** date 24-03-2008 Also PiFast: Same Hardware, same Nick and same Team, both with score ???? I believe this it's wrong - date 25-03-2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715193 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715217 Check and fix it
demiurg Posted March 26, 2008 Posted March 26, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635962http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605415 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605413 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605414 fixed
demiurg Posted March 26, 2008 Posted March 26, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713442wPrime 1.40 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713373 wPrime 1.53 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713355 wPrime 1.54 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709764 Invalid checksum in wPrime fixed
demiurg Posted March 26, 2008 Posted March 26, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715115 no resolution and test details fixed
demiurg Posted March 26, 2008 Posted March 26, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714874 **ERROR in computation** date 24-03-2008 Also PiFast: Same Hardware, same Nick and same Team, both with score ???? I believe this it's wrong - date 25-03-2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715193 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715217 Check and fix it fixed
Nikodemus Posted March 26, 2008 Posted March 26, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678465 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678467 Wrong category, according to screenshot should be Athlon XP-M 2800+
Recommended Posts