demiurg Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 Scores submitted after 01-01-2008 and wPrime version is 1.58 or other, not 1.55: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695963 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577026 no verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693280 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693914 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708024 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695461 invalid no screenshot http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696385 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700239'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700239 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700239 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693281 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691655 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686730 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692302 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696293 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713702 ????? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=712420 ????? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694502 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695363 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685678 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687069 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713707 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695229 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706377 1. This result in global top20, but verification link is broken 2. 248Mb/s in XP Startup is too high, even for 3xIRAM. Ramdisk? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=620593 no orb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578142 this one says invalid but still have points... checked and fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veld Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 wPrime 1.58 after 1/1/08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706979 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706982 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686791 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708619 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709839 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 This is not 6200TC64,i think it's a TC128 version http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714698 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714704 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714713 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714746 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714691 btw:what is the answer about the results uploaded by hipro5@gprhellas's ???It's almost two weeks already without any news????? http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=512&page=134 post 1340 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 Plese Fix this wrong score: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=547463 No screen, no verification , maybe fake ?? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=547510 Idem Previous http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569187 Idem " http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=550039 Idem " http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648583 No resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562652 No screen , broke ORB...no data WPrime 1024m: All Invalid Checksum - Results invalid http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691655 Invalid checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583695 Invalid checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=586232 Invalid checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569688 Invalid checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588453 Invalid checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578117 Invalid checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=568236 Invalid checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589393 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581500 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577450 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569976 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569975 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570178 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683320 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566518 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=579575 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659269 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706958 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572553 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567815 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591482 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643271 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580527 Invalid Checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627598 No screen, no validation, nothing,..... WPrime 1024 : All incorrect version of W.Prime old version after 01-01-2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695363 Date 03-02-2008 Wrong Wprime v 1.43 (1.55 mandatory 01-01-2008) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686080 Data 09-01-2008 Wprime v.1.54 (v1.55 mandatory) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690206 Data 21-01-2008 WPrime v1.41 (v1.55 mandatory ) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707905 Data 05-03-2008 WPrime v1.54 (v1.55 mandatory) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692415 Date 26-01-2008 WPrime v1.54 (v1.55 mandatory) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694053 Date 30-01-2008 WPrime 1.53 (v1.55 Mandatory) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689828 Date 20-01-2008 Wprime 1.54 (v.1.55 Mnadatory) Thanks Demirug, (Gracias por tu trabajo in Spanish -Thank you for your hard work in English) fixed Please pay attention to date of sending of result. Results are older than one year are not a subject to moderation! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=7063771. This result in global top20, but verification link is broken 2. 248Mb/s in XP Startup is too high, even for 3xIRAM. Ramdisk? fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 wPrime 1.58 after 1/1/08http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706979 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706982 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686791 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708619 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709839 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikodemus Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 All these results are submitted as Sempron 3000+ (Athlon XP), but according to descriptions or screenshots they are not. Athlon XP based Sempron is of course Socket A type with Barton core. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650932 Description says DFI NF4 Ultra-D >> Socket 939 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668286 Description says Sempron 64 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587434 Description says Sempron 64 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587460 Description says Sempron 64 And more to come... sorry not to take care of these all at once http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668303 Screenshot shows Palermo S939 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668315 Screenshot shows Palermo S939 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668297 Link to forumpost says Sempron 64, screenshot link broken, but most likely also Palermo core http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668305 Description says Palermo S754 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668310 From link to forumpost you find a screenshot that shows Palermo S754 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 This is not 6200TC64,i think it's a TC128 versionhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714698 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714704 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714713 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714746 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714691 Why do you think so? It is almost impossible to see distinguish between TC64 and TC128 versions http://www.nvidia.com/page/geforce6200_pci Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 I'll show U the difference when I come back home(Today) couse I have 6200TC 64(with 64mb) at the moment I had 3 of them(32,64 and 128TC) but tell me please what is the answer to my second question??(about same results uploaded) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 I'll show U the difference when I come back home(Today) couse I have 6200TC 64(with 64mb) at the moment I had 3 of them(32,64 and 128TC) but tell me please what is the answer to my second question??(about same results uploaded) I do not have answer to this question now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 Hmm I see,but who will answer and when?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manos_ir Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 checked and fixed but still have points......... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578142 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 but still have points.........http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578142 Too old for moderation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manos_ir Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 Too old for moderation yeap.....sorry ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635962 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605415 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605413 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605414 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zavlakas Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713442 wPrime 1.40 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713373 wPrime 1.53 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713355 wPrime 1.54 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709764 Invalid checksum in wPrime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715115 no resolution and test details Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Sweet Posted March 25, 2008 Crew Share Posted March 25, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714874 **ERROR in computation** date 24-03-2008 Also PiFast: Same Hardware, same Nick and same Team, both with score ???? I believe this it's wrong - date 25-03-2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715193 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715217 Check and fix it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635962http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605415 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605413 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605414 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713442wPrime 1.40 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713373 wPrime 1.53 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713355 wPrime 1.54 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709764 Invalid checksum in wPrime fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715115 no resolution and test details fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714874 **ERROR in computation** date 24-03-2008 Also PiFast: Same Hardware, same Nick and same Team, both with score ???? I believe this it's wrong - date 25-03-2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715193 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715217 Check and fix it fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikodemus Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678465 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678467 Wrong category, according to screenshot should be Athlon XP-M 2800+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts