Moose83 Posted December 14, 2012 Posted December 14, 2012 Today i did some test with 5 OCZ Vector and 3 Samsung 840 pro, all in the 128GB Variant:D I was very surprised, when i finished compare these drives, the OCZ Vector ist not bad at all, but it looses against the Samsung 840 Pro. In PCM05 both are really near together, but in PCMark Vantage, the Samsung declasses the Vector much! This was the last time for me, i buy OCZ SSDs, on Paper it looks like the strongest SSD on the market, but the tests show, that this is not more than marketing. Also Support for OCZ is an shame, there toolbox is not available for the Vector Here you can find my test with both SSDS, 3 Samsung against 5 OCZ, shame on you OCZ! http://www.freeocen.de/index.php?page=Thread&postID=213424#post213424 Post 3816;) Quote
Crew Leeghoofd Posted December 14, 2012 Crew Posted December 14, 2012 Are the 240GB versions not better mate ? Quote
Moose83 Posted December 14, 2012 Author Posted December 14, 2012 For PCMark? No, because in Read Speeds and Iops both are the same;) The 256GB Version is only faster in write Speeds, but with Controller, thats not an issue:) Quote
Mikecdm Posted December 15, 2012 Posted December 15, 2012 Interesting results. Were these tests not done with the 1882ix? Quote
Moose83 Posted December 15, 2012 Author Posted December 15, 2012 Of course, i used Areca 1882ix for this test. But i was really surprised about the PCMVantage result, only 3 840 Pro declass 5 OCZ Vector:) Quote
Mikecdm Posted December 15, 2012 Posted December 15, 2012 Just that VS looked a lot lower in those than what you've been subbin lately. Quote
Moose83 Posted December 16, 2012 Author Posted December 16, 2012 This was Stock i7 920 and VS on Areca;) In pcm05 i use onboard for VS;) Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.