Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just arrived today ... haven't done much more than open the box and install the platform and take a few lame-ass flash-enabled pictures. First bios boot looks promising - finally they made the switch to the legendary P55 series bios layout!

 

Will update once I got a few decent figures up.

 

th_100_3106.jpg th_100_3105.jpg th_100_3104.jpg th_100_3103.jpg

 

th_100_3102.jpg th_100_3101.jpg th_100_3100.jpg th_100_3099.jpg

 

th_100_3098.jpg th_100_3097.jpg th_100_3096.jpg

 

th_100_3095.jpg th_100_3094.jpg th_100_3093.jpg

Posted
cloudoc :D

 

lmao

 

I agree.

 

I'm not all too happy about all these 'supercool overclocking solutions'. Of course I can only speak for myself, but I prefer to get a physical overclocking tool inside the box when I buy it. No software, no necessary cell phone or notebook purchase or additional cost.

Posted

can you take pics with the heatsinks of............im interested with the controller(chil?) and driver and mosfets...

 

close up of capacitors(cpu area) too...

 

and max vcore in the bios....

 

and and coldbug comparison with other mobo you tried..

 

thanks :D

Posted

Okay, first 4000-2000-4000 run. Same OS, same CPU, same memory, same everything besides the mainboard.

 

Memory set to 'extreme', '6/4 config' and '7-7-7-21 1T and TRCF=100 fixed, other auto'

 

test2.png

 

Comparison with another board here

Posted

Bios lay-out is good; they implented the MIT layout from the P55 series onto this board. By the way ... no one noticed the UDP7 string coming with bios F2? Just FYI, flashing the bios to F4a doesn't change the UDP7 string ... I wonder if that's because of the rev0.2 PCB. This is a media sample, by the way, no special overclockers sample.

 

I'm still trying to work-around the 222MHz BCLK issue. It seems to be the same issue like I had on the UD7: 222MHz wall on air cooling, more on subzero. Will test the subzero part tonight.

Posted

Mainly 1M and Wprime 32M for the Benelux GOOC qualification (not that I have a chance ... A0 allowed :D ).

 

I've got a GTX 480 prepped as well ... who know, maybe.

Posted

Not much, really.

 

Quickly tested my own retail and crosscheckt coldbug with Xpower: both boards act the same.

 

I'm a bit 'pissed' that the board laying on my desk here is rev 0.2, which is not retail. This means that any issues I report can be swept from the table stating the board isn't retail. In fact, it's possible that my overclocking results don't resemble the overclocking results on retail ... :(

Posted
Not much, really.

 

Quickly tested my own retail and crosscheckt coldbug with Xpower: both boards act the same.

 

I'm a bit 'pissed' that the board laying on my desk here is rev 0.2, which is not retail. This means that any issues I report can be swept from the table stating the board isn't retail. In fact, it's possible that my overclocking results don't resemble the overclocking results on retail ... :(

 

That sucks :( They need to send you a new one because you perform the detailed real world test that these boards will be used for. Send them an email for a new retail revision :D

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...