trodas Posted May 6, 2015 Author Share Posted May 6, 2015 Well, the test was made on highly overclocked i7, so it is well possible that on old machines it could help more. Gotta try it next time I try the SuperPi for more speed PAT is in Memset Performance Mode. It was actually a feature for i875. But then the Abit IC7-MAX3 have more modern chipset that the ASRock 775i65g...! What do i865G stand against the i875 in terms of speed? BTW, the performance mode seems enabled by default in i865 according to this screenshot of mine: So there is no reason to fall back because of PAT. Waza would give less that minute, so then a WinXP optimizing is only one thing that is left Suggestions? I actually think that I disabled the WFP, the unnecessary services... and then there is not much left to do. Right or wrong? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 BTW, the performance mode seems enabled by default in i865 according to this screenshot of mine: So there is no reason to fall back because of PAT. If i remember correctly. The 865 chipset had PAT activated (in bios) up to 200fsb. After that point , no PAT. So , you are ok at this point (150fsb). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trodas Posted May 14, 2015 Author Share Posted May 14, 2015 Strunkenbold - Waza is more effective the less your CPU has cache. Its not only 5sec on old machines but more something like 30-60sec. PAT is in Memset Performance Mode. It was actually a feature for i875. Well, then I probably should start to use Waza, because w/o the Waza I get to 32min 52sec 609ms with my P4 650 at 215x17: http://hwbot.org/submission/2858082_trodas_superpi___32m_pentium_4_650_32min_52sec_609ms (first place using the ASRock 775i65G mobo, lol... and I did not even tried very hard to get there... just used good cooler - Noctua NH-C12P SE14 and damn serious PSU - eVGA Supernova G2 850W ... and there is it Now how about 217x17?! ) So if using Waza grant me 30 to 60 sec, then my result will be even better. That seems to be worth the try... when your rams come by Still nothing yet, so I wonder when you send me these? TASOS - If i remember correctly, the 865 chipset had PAT activated (in bios) up to 200fsb. After that point, no PAT. Good to know, thanks! I also noticed, that the PAT need to be enabled past 200MHz - eg. as soon, as I started overclocking the P4. I could only wonder, where my Core 2 Extreme X6800 is waiting. Ordered one from China and hoped for some fun with unlocked multiplier - eg. to be possible to push the FSB really high Strunkenbold promised rams, that can do 265MHz with reasonable timings, so together and all-in-all it could be interesting overclocking platform. Some records should be broken - hopefully How it evolve over time: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trodas Posted July 1, 2015 Author Share Posted July 1, 2015 Now testing these nice Qimonda rams on ASRock 775Dual-VSTA mobo Things are looking good - first using testing Celeron D 336 2.8GHz, these rams can do at PC3200 (200MHz clock) 1T, dual channel (of course) and 4 Way interleave. 8 Way was a bit too much, sadly... Now off to finetune the other timings in hope to get even more speeeeeeeeed from them. Memtest ram speed jumped from default setting 1772MB/sec to 2133MB/sec Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filmbot Posted July 1, 2015 Share Posted July 1, 2015 I have some old OCZ Platnium Rev.2 and P4C800 and DFI Ultra-D laying around. Plan benching both platforms when I get time so I'll make sure to post any memory results here for you guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trodas Posted July 3, 2015 Author Share Posted July 3, 2015 (edited) Sure, show you they can go. Qimonda rams runs in memtest at default settings at 1772MB/sec. After setting them properly, they run at 2305MB/sec (2370 when used the Pipeline DRQCTL on): CAS - 3 DRAM Bank Interleave - 4 Way TRCD - 3 TRP - 2 TRAS - 8 TRFC - 9 TRRD - 2 TRTP - 2 TWTR - 1 TWR - 2 DRAM Bus Selection - Dual Channel DRAM Command Rate - 1T Kinda difference. The ram divider is locked at 5:6 and with the DDR 400 settings it get to 197MHz, when FSB is 164MHz. Not that bad for a Celeron D 336 (old Presscot core). Edited July 23, 2015 by trodas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trodas Posted October 2, 2015 Author Share Posted October 2, 2015 Strunkenbold Qimonda DDR rams in PI-A9RX480 - 254MHz w/o even trying any overclock: Sure, 3-3-2-8 is not any miracle and the dreaded 2T is likely mainboard fault, as years before it worked well with 1T ... and now it does not. Recapping is in order, IMHO... But the rams are going pretty strong Time to push harder... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.