ZFeSS
-
Posts
214 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by ZFeSS
-
-
Epic!
-
It's really M0? Which s-spec this e6300?
-
Minor bug. Every day we've got this achievement.
-
Ticket ID: 1877
Priority: Low
Please add Xeon E3-1240 v2\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/vdq0fb\r\nhttp://ark.intel.com/products/65730\r\nhttp://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Xeon/Intel-Xeon%20E3-1240%20v2.html
-
Ticket ID: 1867
Priority: Low
Please add Xeon E5-2420\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/p9k04t\r\nhttp://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Xeon/Intel-Xeon%20E5-2420.html\r\nhttp://ark.intel.com/products/64617
-
If you wanna 1GB sticks, you should search for Hynix D43 - DT-D43 or BT-D43, not CTP-D43. They do 250+ with 2.5-3-3-x timings, they are cheap and easy to find everywhere.
-
Is it possible to get stats for most benched CPUs for non "X" and "K" models? I want to know how reduced percentage of non XE cpus at hwbot after SB announce. Total numbers are welcome too
I think it would be interesting. -
I think it wiil be useful for you
230 is max for your settings, only cas3 will help you a bit. Just sell this mems and buy hynix D43, it's cheaper, easy to find and clocks better.
-
2GSamsum TCCDfailed
Yes, you're right
You failed, TCCD is 256mbit IC, so is 512MB max per stick.Looking at specs I think that you should try 3-4-4-8 first.
Just sell this trash and don't waste your time for it.
-
Wow, almost 550+.
I've got a pack of 2180 and get a problem - few cpus get only 320 FSP at 10x multi(3200MHz), but no problem for 400+ FSB at x9(3600+). It's not the same in your case?
-
Thanks for the info. It's rather rare board, the only one good result on it that I know it's youngpro's 2001 at 647FSB. All other you see in rating below
They are no good and I know people struggled even at 550-570. -
Wow, what a board. 600Mhz is max or you didn't try?
-
I think the problem here is that it only displays 1x scores, rather than all.
Nope. It displays 1x cpu and 2x cpu results when you select amount "any". Old QX9775 submissions(before 2009) got LGA775 socket and new got LGA771(2013) - this is the reason.
Compare queries http://url.hwbot.org/1dsyFzS and http://url.hwbot.org/I7VhY5
-
When I try to search fastest SPi 32M LGA771 result(http://url.hwbot.org/1i4iU4i), it shows me that GENiEBEN is fastest, but he is only 5th in QX9775 category. When I narrow my search(adding QX9775 in cpu model), that shows me, that there are only 2 submissions in SPi 32m with QX9775. If you look at QX9775 you will se that it's 8 result there. Other can be found with LGA775 and QX9775 filter, which absolutely wrong. If reason of this bug is in wrong define of socket for QX9775 before, and after changes old submissions still got LGA775 and new - 771, it may happen in other categories(LGA2011 moved to LGA1356, s603 moved to s604, etc).
-
-
Ticket ID: 1823
Priority: Low
Please add Xeon E5-2609\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/bkuwu4\r\nhttp://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Xeon/Intel-Xeon%20E5-2609.html\r\nhttp://ark.intel.com/products/64588/
-
will buy #3.
-
1
-
-
Ticket ID: 1819
Priority: Low
AMD Phenom II P920\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/w4yhzy\r\nhttp://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K10/AMD-Phenom%20II%20Quad-Core%20Mobile%20P920%20-%20HMP920SGR42GM.html\r\nhttp://products.amd.com/en-na/NotebookCPUDetail.aspx?id=664&f1=&f2=&f3=&f4=&f5=&f6=&f7=&f8=&f9=\r\n
-
I smell a GPU-Z bug...
NV42 definitely clocks better. I've tested some 6800XT and GS cards and can say that NV41 clocks 70-80MHz worse at same voltages. Bug really exists. At all of this cards GPU-Z shows NV41.
All cards are created unequal, by the same definition. If some manufacturer have deliberately decided to make their card slower (=worse), why can't we just accept the fact that the card is not too competitive against other cards of the same model rather than generating a specific category for it?Using this logic if non-reference cards get additional memory and packed with DDR2 instead of DDR3 they also should be in the same category, cause "some manufacturer have deliberately decided to make their card slower (=worse)", and at the other side 4850 GDDR5 should be placed with GDDR3 ones, it will be just "lightning"
Cards with different memory sizes usually packed with different rated ICs. Reference Ti 4200 64MB got 4ns mem, and reference 128 - 5ns, for this reason they even got different default clocks. And there no difference between them in terms of speed at the same clocks in possible benchmarks - 64mb is enough for 03.
-
Can I ask you for VGA RAM IC and voltages?
-
When I try to submit new result and click "prepopulate fields by previous submission", I can't modify VGA clocks. This feature was wery useful before.
-
Ticket ID: 1790
Priority: Low
Core i3 3220T default speed is 2800MHz, not 3300. And TDP is 35W - not 55. Please fix it, and move results made with regular i3 3220 to the proper category.\r\nhttp://ark.intel.com/products/65694/
-
Ticket ID: 1789
Priority: Low
Please add GeForce 615\r\n
\r\n\r\nand lenovo mahobay mobo as well\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/8zvnx8 -
HWBOT R5 Bugs/Features 2.0 - Report bugs or request new HWBOT features here
in HWBOT Rev.5
Posted
Double hw points points in one category:
http://hwbot.org/benchmark/superpi_-_32m/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_1119#start=0#interval=20
http://hwbot.org/submission/2369029_kwaz2_superpi___32m_athlon_64_3200_venice_s939_24min_34sec_0ms
http://hwbot.org/submission/2533930_kwaz2_superpi___32m_athlon_64_3200_venice_s939_24min_11sec_609ms
Hint maybe: second one is for competition.