Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

16 Good

About ZFeSS

  • Rank
    grunt bot


  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Few years ago Tolsty said that he mage hypers work @ 2100-2200C7 on this board
  2. ZFeSS

    HWBOT Rev8 going live now.

    I've got a problem with HWDB page. It gives me 500 error, break area around logo and make text style in search window unreadable. Search window in Firefox seems slow for me too, IE works fine. "Team rankings" tab on the team page not working in Firefox - it redirects to main team tab after loading, IE works fine. Opera 12 is working! Got problems with smooth scrolling and slow search window only.
  3. CAS4 is possible for good kit @2.2v CAS5 is easy at this clocks for any normal D9GTR kit. Nice clocks for SS.
  4. ZFeSS

    Corsair Dominator GTX2

    What kind of problems you have with? I have an opposite experience - Hypers are hard for 775, but your Cellshocks are working fine.
  5. I see F-die sticks made in 2011, so it's not werid. G-die produced until the end of 2012 AFAIK G-die DIY available =)
  6. I ask for help. All competitors who use 6800GS cards - compare a rivatuner and GPU-Z GPU detection, please. According to my experience GPU-Z detect all NV42 GPUs as NV41 and riva shows the right info. It makes problems with NV41 and NV42 categories splitting. It will be good if you can add a photo of your GPU too.
  7. ZFeSS

    Frequency detection bug with old Socket 5 CPUs

    I don't like situations like this, cause someone will be disappointed in the end no matter what decision was made. All of this submissions may be not wrong, but they may be not right also. You can choose your side but nothing more. I trust this guys and appreciate their effort. What we will say if someone "new" ask about those submissions? What will we do if someone will post a result with bugged cpu-z version? Should we trust him? Should we ban him? That's why I suppose that decision should be made right now. It would be better if we discuss it before removal because other fellow members feel better this way. Decision was made and I can understand it even if I don't like it. Anyway bug existed, fixed and we can move on. I think it's good news. Looks like I missed something interesting
  8. ZFeSS

    OSiBS season 4 design thread

    GRIFF Table for Round 5 is not correct, because Remarc and maybe someone else made final submissions after 15 Jul. Competition has ended but not closed. I submit my 17k result in 3DM03 at last seconds of competition and was surprised when Remarc's one appeared day after. I don't check other stages. Thank you for the table. It was great contest.
  9. Dual mendocino without 440BX is something new.
  10. ZFeSS

    nVidia 7800 and 7900 series

    7800GTX and 7800GTX 512 have different names too. That's what I try to explain to you. It's first and main reason to divide them. I agreed with you, that 7900 series cards with 256 and 512Mb can be merged, but not 7800GTX.
  11. ZFeSS

    nVidia 7800 and 7900 series

    Your reasoning is even worse. In that case we should merge all RX400 and RX500 series, R9 290 and 390, same for 7000 and R9/R7 series, GTX770 and 680, GTX460 and 560, and more than 50 other models. Same for CPU. Should we merge i7-8700K and 8086K? Maybe all AMD FX series? Why we not merge cards with same PCB, memory speedbin, memory amount, but should merge cards which differs much more? Also all 7800GTX and 7800GTX 512 are reference cards. First reason for new category was different model name - http://www.nvidia.com/page/geforce_7800.html Nvidia says that 7800GTX and 7800GTX 512 are different cards.