rbuass
V.I.P.
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by rbuass
-
Congratz;;;; 3dr time winner....oh noooooooooo hahahahaha
-
-
-
That s the question... To do the same, will need VGPU Mod, VRAM mod, VPLL Mod, CB Mod, OCP Mod...eg...and try lots and lots of times and tweaks...and sure...to do a hard overclock in the CPU too P.S. mine is a crap GTX 580...no more than 1394 Mhz and i killed trying to get better
-
Possible...but i am looking for a 6GB chip like Booooon to get about 500 CPU points
-
Bonus Extra only to 4way/3Way cards, and not for all. I don t consider PCmark (don t like cuz "TO ME" is a "Hard Disk" bench), but is only my opinion... To me, will be many more easy a lucky guy climb in the ranking.... I hope i can be lucky and find a cherry chip... What diference really get points??? 3DM01 ---- CPUZ 3DM03 ---- PCM05 3DM05 ---- Pifast 3DM06 ---- SPI1M Vantage ---- SPI32 AM3 ---- WPrime 32 Unigine DX11 ---- WPrime 1024
-
c'mon The view I'm talking about, does not take merit to overclock with Sandy Bridge. What I'm asking is whether an Overclock 3D, which is much harder to do, should be worth more points than the 2D. Say you need to tweak memory and good tweaks to Copy Waza or have a light windows is a good argument, but say it can compare to a mod or Hipro Shamino is not wanting to see reality. I am not rich and live in a country where hardware is much more difficult to buy and to obtain than in countries like USA and Taiwan, but why not let to recognize what is more difficult. The settings of hardware (memory and CPU) are strongly needed for testing 3D. As for my point of view, Sandy Bridge is killing the art of Overclocking "a living because overclocking is a much easier where the luck factor and have a good pair of memories has more validity than a good knowledge. As the observation of "Iron", say you're much more concerned with the position of your teammates than to see the reality. In my view, the facts that require more knowledge, which are more difficult and require more risk and dedication should be rewarded with more points. So I think a very wrong person to buy a chip and do a lot of points awarded. For me 3D>> 2D in terms of difficulty, so should be worth more points. About rev.4 on, I hope it benchmarks that are more difficult and require more knowledge and dedication are rewarded with more points. IMHO.
-
-
I want to open a discussion here, to see the opinions of friends, and if possible change something about it. We have observed a negative scenario for overclockers, because Sandy Bridge, provide many points even for people who do not have much technical knowledge. Any lucky person who purchases a 2500K or 2600k, can easily climb many positions, and for that, only very simple settings in the BIOS (in my opinion, the platform is easier to adjust, and also uses voltages low enough, and very low risk - diferent to bench LN2 VGAs for exemple). To make the situation worse, this platform greatly increases the chance of great results, 3D benchmarks like 01, 03 and Unigine heaven (do not need much CPU). Today we can already see the Sandy Bridge coming close to 6 GHz, and that with the effort to get lucky to buy (or make) a good CPU (and sure, is better to have knowledge to get best scores, but not a lot of knowledge to get very good scores only with a lucky CPU). The question is. Is not it time the 3D benchmarks are more valuable than the 2D benchmarks? (once to run a Vantage record is hard to get than a 2D Record...and sure...3D needs more knowledge and more risk to kill hardware) Besides being much easier to adjust and control the 2D benchmarks do not require adjustments more difficult (which are those of VGA) and few times requires hardmods and modifications. My opinion is that the 3D points should be enough higher than 2D, because it requires much more knowledge, and the luck factor does not weigh much in the results. Thus we do not see systems like Sandy Bridge, killing the overclock and making only one factor whose luck has a weight so great (obviously not putting down the results to cost a lot of work and tweaks) This is just my opinion and would like to know of other overclockers. Sorry the broken english Regards
-
Hi friends...any news about Rev.4???
-
-
i only read this thread now... Sure is very dificult to manage 5 pots...and i agree to give WR points bonus, but i would like the same to 1 or 2 videocards. I think this way for 2 reasons. 1st - with only one card you have to fight hard to reach higgest clocks as possible (is possible more dificult to get 1 x 1500 Mhz than 4 x 1000 Mhz) 2nd - i naver will have money to buy 4 videocards and feed 5 pots. Is just hard to buy one + LN2 for 2 pots. Would like Rev. 4 add 3D bonus to all categories (1, 2, 3 or 4 VGAs) About bonus to 2D i don t agree,,,, I think this way cause 2D needs less effort and is many more easy to bench 2D than 3D. Few motherboards needs hardmods...but is usually you have to hardmod your videocard. Good CPU results needs good lucky...if you have lucky and get a cherry CPU...you will get good points its sure. But if you buy a good videocard...you need to hardmod and preparate the card to bench...is many more hard than 2D... is juts my opinion
-
Hmhmh... One idea is: Top 20 or top 30 (+ or) good hwbot achievments like OC Knight or more... Will separate and encourage the guys to bench more and more following best results... I would like to keep the achievements...but don t know if it will continue.. Is only my opinion... What hwbot decide will be ok for me,,,
-
No. ... I am saying is that in my opinion, it should be extreme overclocking and have good results, otherwise there is no reason to separate the UFL of XOL. If the same thing, no need for three leagues and only two would suffice (XOL and no XOL). I think that if they create two different leagues for people using extreme cooling systems, they should be divided according to some criterion, and not by choice that otherwise would have no meaning
-
I think the UFL should not be free because any people (good or no good overclocker) will join, only to say is part of the league. I believe, in my humble opinion, that the hwbot should select the members of the UFL, and only the overclockers should participate with good results. But as I said, it's just my opinion P.S. will HWbot keep our achievements???
-
-
-
-
-
-
SmartDoctor Crashes after possible bug, you an be sure... But you can try lots of times, and its easy...you don t need special LN2 or Dice preparated system. Just run and comprove. You don t need the same result...but if you did 453K and run 448~450K will be easy and fine to you comprove. But i think will be impossible cuz i saw lots of guys running stronger than your system about 425K. Best regards
-
What happen friend.... Thats a bad score to a great run... I think you did have some issues... Best regards & Go ACA
-
I think its a bug. You can check there are lots of guys with many more clock and many less points. VGA show thats stock settings...then i don t believe there is not a bug. Compare... http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2116275_dancop_aquamark_geforce_gtx_580_419851_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2128007_predator_aquamark_geforce_gtx_580_427925_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2118934_1day_aquamark_geforce_gtx_580_426453_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2128281_dacosa_aquamark_geforce_gtx_580_420394_marks
-
Nice to see you in #1st Congratz friend...keep pushing
-
I noticed lots of 980X is good for 3D and Pifast, but no good for Spi. I think is a IMC problem and you need high voltage at the RAMs to work. But lots of 980X run CPUz with great frequency...but don t keep good performance in 3D... Dreaming with a 990X or 980X running like Hicookie or Nickshih's CPU...lol