Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

rbuass

V.I.P.
  • Posts

    1844
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by rbuass

  1. I did remove the result and added again. Problem fixed Thanks
  2. There are some bug with my Wprime 32 Global points (i think the bug is cause equal points Core i5 670 = Core i7 965 = 27.5 points). There are no Global points and i lose 27.5 points You can check there are no points added http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?userId=20691&applicationId=14 Few minutes ago i did have 667 points and now 638 points. Please fix the problem. Thanks again
  3. First benching - AMD 6 core @ 6700 Mhz Thats my first Thuban benching The CPU haves a very nice performance and I could do the tests with only 1.7 V (BIOS); to CPUZ (from 6630 mhz to higger) was necessary to greatly increase the voltage to try a suicidal CPUZ screen. I know I could have achieved better results with a better operating system (my XP installation CD was defective and gave blue screen throughout the installation and Vista Lite corrupted in the first few minutes benching, then I turned to format my wife's Vista Home Premium without any Tweak at -18X C. The system was already in sub zero and LN2 in Brazil is very expensive then I could not waste more time and LN2. I'm sure that AMD will be a great choice for low cost, especially for those who like to do extreme OC. After posting more results. I can only credit for the 790 GB for its strength and excellent performance. Look at the state that were the parts after the session AMD bench is funny
  4. I don t know why this CPU don t likes ratio 28... I tried but it works better 2 cores i tried 2:8, but system can t run 6720 Mhz. I will try a little bit more, but i think its the CPU limit.
  5. i removed the #2 score; problem is fixed Thanks
  6. the correct link http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?userId=20691&applicationId=7 Thanks
  7. My best SPi 32 score have no Global points. Rank and points. SuperPi 32m ranking: not your best submission for this ranking. #2. SuperPi 32m - 6min 45sec 734ms - rbuass (Team Adrenaline) - (Intel Core i5 670) 0.3 points My results #1. SuperPi 32m - 6min 38sec 280ms - rbuass (Team Adrenaline) - (Intel Core i7 980X @5861MHz) no points 966459 #2. SuperPi 32m - 6min 45sec 734ms - rbuass (Team Adrenaline) - (Intel Core i5 670) 0.3 points 871328 #3. SuperPi 32m - 7min 0sec 300ms - rbuass (Team Adrenaline) - (Intel Core i7 Extreme 965 @5387MHz) 14.9 + 9.2 points I understand 980X not allowed yet, but my i5 670 score is better than Extreme 965. I did receive the i7 Extreme 965 points (Global), but the score of the i5 670 is better. Please fix this error and give me the i5 670 points. The link http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?...pplicationId=7 Thanks friends
  8. Thanks....just removed Can close the topic
  9. I don t understand why this guy report my result "2010-02-24 22:23:35.0 - rbuass: manual online submission 2010-02-24 22:25:14.0 - (crew) Thor941: checked by a moderator () 2010-02-25 20:58:33.0 - Olesius: reported by user due to lack of validation (i think 2result submited by 1sys http://hwbot.org/community/submission/965929_guerreiro215_superpi_core_i5_670_6sec_516ms) I never share results with anybody... But i deleted the result, cause i just do one best... Unfortunably we have to report here, but please, delete to my profile please. Thanks
  10. Hi friends! I posted a new score with a Aquamark (Gulftown). I don t want the Global points until the 980X is allowed, but HWBot removed my valid score. invalid score - no global points - ok http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/966042_rbuass_aquamark_radeon_hd_5870_401001_marks valid score - but i have no my Global points http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/943810_rbuass_aquamark_radeon_hd_5870_381018_marks I think the same with a 3dM05 score, but i am waiting. Sorry but i have no a good english (but i do my best to explain ) I will apreciate so much if you add my valid points Thanks for all
  11. Thanks friend... I only used CW to a 32Mb...but i can try with CW I will try to improve this result, but i think is the Max this CPU can give me. Keep in touch
  12. Check the result #8. 3Dmark 2005 - 42511 marks - rbuass (Team Adrenaline) - (Ati Radeon HD 5870 @1100/1250MHz) http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/953935_rbuass_3dmark_2005_radeon_hd_5870_42511_marks I have no points about this result; please fix the problem and give me the points. p.s. before it was correct, but i put a new score using Gulftown and lose the score (now i just deleted the Gulftown score, but i have a 44777 valid score to add to my results). Thanks ans sorry the "extra work"
  13. very thanks again Massman I hope i get a good result to see u again in MOA 2010
  14. I ask for remove my result... I have no Global points with Phenom II 965, and i have no global points with Gulftown too. But i can t remove the results until Gulf is allowed. Then i have less points
  15. Ok Massman...but there are no icon to remove; Why can i do it? And...one more thing... The Gulftown Global points just removed, but still not Global points to the result. PLease check it and sorry the "extra work i am giving" Global (with gulftown) just removed http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/940513_rbuass_3dmark_2005_radeon_hd_5870_42865_marks No Global points with the allowed processor (phenom X4 965) http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/953935_rbuass_3dmark_2005_radeon_hd_5870_42511_marks Thanks a lot
  16. Sure Massman Mine http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/947045_rbuass_superpi_core_i5_670_7sec_223ms&popup=true Alexandre (was in Overclocking Elite Summit too) http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/947480_ziebert_superpi_core_i5_670_7sec_222ms And please...can with help me with one more thing? I did submit this result: http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/953935_rbuass_3dmark_2005_radeon_hd_5870_42511_marks I did not receive global points (i don t know why...is possible that its cause i have a higger result with Gulftown http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/940513_rbuass_3dmark_2005_radeon_hd_5870_42865_marks Can you fix it? Thanks friend
  17. and one more thing...the results are not the same... Thanks again
  18. I do not understand why a person reports a result without at least investigating. It just hurt. Not know me and report my result without any certainty. VIEW - EDIT 7sec 223ms reported by user SuperPi rules 2010-01-18 15:23:44.0 - rbuass: online manual submission 2010-01-31 16:12:36.0 - pascalhaegens: reported by user (2 persons, 2 scores, 1 system) Pascalhaegens not know this, but was present in Massman Overclocking Elite Summit and was able to witness that I and Alexander Ziebert we had two different computers. This type of unfortunate people in hwbot. Please remove the report Thanks friend
  19. Thanks Massman I know i can be better, but the big bang can not help us. See you tomorrow
  20. PLease. This score don t give me any global points. http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/947045_rbuass_superpi_core_i5_670_7sec_223ms Are this correct? Thanks in advance
  21. PLease, still wrong. The correct is the #1 place Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...