Everything posted by rbuass
-
Giant 3D elephant in the room no one wants to talk about...(why is it always me bringing this stuff to light?)
That was all that was missing. It's been a long time that I don't post results in the league, but also it's been a long time the 3D benchmark has more influence on a good assembly (mounting), not breaking the thermal paste (which needs to be the best and from the best batch), and of course, having a chip gold awarded. But result bug for records is the last. Thanks for sharing.
- biso biso - GeForce RTX 3090 @ 2895/1444MHz - 20014 marks 3DMark - Port Royal
- biso biso - GeForce RTX 3090 @ 2820/1444MHz - 18833 marks 3DMark - Port Royal
-
Dancop - GeForce RTX 3090 @ 2550/1419MHz - 60086 marks 3DMark11 - Performance
Good Job as usual, Daniel. Keep pushing ???
- mllrkllr88 - Ryzen 7 5800X @ 5913MHz - 27.528 fps HWBOT x265 Benchmark - 4k
- Luumi - GeForce RTX 3090 @ 2805/1444MHz - 18710 marks 3DMark - Port Royal
- NoMS - GeForce RTX 3090 @ 2400/1359MHz - 9679 Points Unigine Superposition - 8K Optimized
- Splave - Ryzen Threadripper 3990X @ 5200.6MHz - 40891 marks Cinebench - R20
- OGS - GeForce RTX 3090 @ 2880/1386MHz - 18661 marks 3DMark - Port Royal
-
3D Benchmark proposal list for 2021
I would like to do a resquest, to your analisys. There are 2 special benchmarks that I think should be included for Global. One is GPUpi 1B, because will show the highest frequency some graphic card can run a test. GPUpi 32B is heavier, and so, the overclocker cannot run with too high clocks, so is very impressive to see running @ 3 Ghz or more. The second is Catzilla, that's a very nice 3D bench allowed for Global points in the past (2 versions, 720P and 1440P). It would be great to see Catzilla 1440P again on ranking for Global points, since requires very strong performance and tweaks. Just for reference, Allion Labs, I think one of the most important certification labs in the world, uses Catzilla for tests, since will have very strong requests and peaks. Who remember the crashs under Raymark, know what I'm talking about. Best wishes for all overclocker.
-
New Style Rules discussion thread
No, mate, I consider that you do a great job in the league, Indispensable for the organization of the HWBOT. Sorry if I posted in the wrong place, but I really find these two benchmarks interesting for the reasons I mentioned. In any case, we are a community and I understand that the majority should prevail.,
- Rbuass - GeForce RTX 3090 @ 2800/1380MHz - 18637 marks 3DMark - Port Royal
- Rbuass - GeForce RTX 3090 @ 2800/1380MHz - 18637 marks 3DMark - Port Royal
- OGS - GeForce RTX 3090 @ 2850/1315MHz - 119968 marks 3DMark Vantage - Extreme
- Rbuass - GeForce RTX 3090 @ 2865/1378MHz - 18590 marks 3DMark - Port Royal
-
New Style Rules discussion thread
I would like to do a resquest, to your analisys. There are 2 special benchmarks that I think should be included for Global. One is GPUpi 1B, because will show the highest frequency some graphic card can run a test. GPUpi 32B is heavier, and so, the overclocker cannot run with too high clocks, so is very impressive to see running @ 3 Ghz or more. The second is Catzilla, that's a very nice 3D bench allowed for Global points in the past (2 versions, 720P and 1440P). It would be great to see Catzilla 1440P again on ranking for Global points, since requires very strong performance and tweaks. Just for reference, Allion Labs, I think one of the most important certification labs in the world, uses Catzilla for tests, since will have very strong requests and peaks. Who remember the crashs under Raymark, know what I'm talking about. Best wishes for all overclocker.
- Rbuass - GeForce RTX 3090 @ 2805/1400MHz - 11092 Points Unigine Superposition - 8K Optimized
- OGS - GeForce RTX 3090 @ 2970/1219MHz - 1min 34sec 770ms GPUPI v3.3 - 32B
- Rbuass - GeForce RTX 3090 @ 2805/1400MHz - 11092 Points Unigine Superposition - 8K Optimized
-
New Style Rules discussion thread
Well my friend. I was not be part of this Thread, but I told it's no my decision. For me, both, Extreme and Performance should be valid, because settings are different. Time Spy matter much more CPU than Time Spy Extreme, Fire Strike Ultra has less CPU than Fire Strike and so on. For this reason, in my opinion and since we need to give diffeerent focus, I understand that both should be valid for globals. But as I told you, it's not up to me, but the community. Best wishes
-
New Style Rules discussion thread
Removed Fire Strike Ultra... Removed Fire Strike... Removed Time Spy... Removed Vantage Performance... Removed GPUPi 1B... Removed Catzilla in the past. Instead to add more benchmarks and keep the old, to have more options. This make all efforts made I made for push good scores, useless, in my opinion. It also removes the desire to fight for good results, because when Hwbot decide, it will be worthless. So many results and so much wasted effort. That's a pity, I am pretty sure many people like me disagree, but I have no power to decide. Best wishes for all.
-
FS: 5950X 5.9G cinebench cpu
Hello Mr. Acch3uS! I would like to buy your CPU. If the friends above not get, I will take. If you acccept Paypal, we can deal easy. I can pay shipping to Brazil. e-mail rbuass@hotmail.com Best wishes.
-
Splave - Radeon RX 6900 XT @ 2850/2130MHz - 17641 marks 3DMark - Fire Strike Ultra
Wow.... 1 amazing extra point ???
- Dancop - GeForce GTX 980 Ti @ 1492.6/2000.7MHz - 101082 marks 3DMark05
- safedisk - GeForce RTX 3090 @ 2460/1393MHz - 49290 marks 3DMark - Fire Strike