IanCutress

So to try and win a 460, you must enter with a 460? ... That's one way to run a comp I guess

Ticket ID: 1014 Priority: Low Suggestion - if on a timed benchmark someone submits a 0.000sec(i.e. forget to put the time in), it comes back an error for them? That would stop the 0.000sec submissions requiring moderation?

I like them, but I used to be an Xbox360 achievement whore. As Thor says, adding in the old ones for HW Junkie, HW Guru would be nice (or use them as a 'title' like Team captain on the profile pages) Could have: 'Submitted results X different sockets' 'Entered X HWbot competitions' 'Broadcast a livestream' 'MaxxMem score under 10 points' (same as the AQ low score runs or SPi 32m slow run) One thing you could do is have a check box on submissions for Mobo/GPU voltmods, then achievement: 'Submitted X results with voltmods and pictures'

What drivers were those? GPU-Z doesn't have any official ones listed.

We saw some 2000 6-6-5 at the Gigabyte GOOC with GTX Rev 2.1s. This is crazy! Need some of those GTX2s

Nice memory

I've been developing a bench which is solely this; however it's currently only written for nVidia GPUs in CUDA. I need to port it to OpenCL for ATi cards. Unfortunately OpenCL looks like an arse to program... https://www.benchtec.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=4947 So far we've seen: Quadro FX580 (in dual E5520) score 164.8 8800GT (in E5520) score 550.5 9800GX2 in Q9650 (@3.6Ghz) score 1173.2 (585.76 for first GPU, 587.48 for second) 9600 (in E6400) score 423.8 260M in i7 920 score 516.8 But with any GPU bench, it'll be somewhat effected by the bus speed in any memory copy (RAM to GPU) situation. Mine gets around that by only ever doing it twice and it taking microseconds.

LoL my captcha for signing up was 'new members'

You have to use the autocomplete 'DDR2' rather than just typing it in. At least that's what I have to do.

Nice work! Few bugs... Total Points: 160.10000038146973 You received -0.1 points. (Shouldn't that be 'You lost'?) Like the changes, especially the notifications. Would be nice to see what they refer to without clicking a link (You lost -0.1 points on your Radeon HD 4850 3DMark 2003).

Here's the files if anyone wants to test. It's worked so far on a variety of setups, including 9800GX2, and 260M, on XP and win7. One person had an issue with GTX295 and win7 64-bit that I need to try some things to get it to work. I'd duly make a new thread here for it when I've an ATi version working, otherwise discussion is here and http://www.benchtec.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=4947 CUDA enabled card required, plus 185.25+ drivers (I think they're the lowest possible)

Technically yes, there's no 'OR' in the rules section. Though there are plenty of submissions that don't have both. I don't doubt Vince's ability, just seems odd that it's hidden is all.

I know it's been verified by Futuremark, but why hide the Bench settings in 03 in your screenshot when they're required to be shown under HWBot rules?

Yeah, changed it a bit in the past 10 mins - picture updated. Now does multiple nVidia GPUs, but one at a time. Though the checksum implementation would be best to stop photoshop (which is relatively easy with console programs like this and PiFast) - I've looked online at solutions, but just ended up scratching my head further... I've no experience of OpenCL though, which may be the main hurdle.

I'm currently working on a GPU calculation bench which is CPU independant, but it's currently in single GPU mode for nVidia CUDA cards only. It runs a 3D Finite Difference problem on the GPU for 30 secs, and during that time monitors the best peak speed the card achieves. Still to go are: Checksum at the end MultiGPU setups OpenCL So for example my Quadro FX 580 does:

On air? Wow...

Ticket ID: 807 Priority: High Found a card not in the database:\r\n\r\nhttp://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/e3bym/\r\n\r\nThis is AGP 2x, different from the Xpert 99 currently in the system. That was taken with the latest (2002) XP drivers and the latest GPU-z. Would be nice if you could add it - thanks

Ticket ID: 766 Priority: Low http://techpowerup.com/gpuz/afs23\r\n\r\nI see categories for the 128mb and 256mb versions of this card, but not the 512mb version. Would be very grateful if you could add this category

Ticket ID: 757 Priority: Low Take my entry:\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/community/submission/943907_borandi_cpu_z_celeron_s478_330_3500.3_mhz\r\n\r\nIf I click on the \'CPU-Z Celeron s478 330 rank\' link, it shows the top 20 cpu-z scores for this proc. If I click on the 20-40 link/arrow on that page, it then takes me to position 20-40 for all of CPU-Z.\r\n\r\nJust a minor bug, but an FYI

Ticket ID: 756 Priority: Low Hi, can you please add this motherboard?\r\n\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=945000\r\n\r\nThanks

Probably 141.9

Time to bring out the old laptops

Sounds like a duff install somewhere. OS reinstall?

About half my scores I can't edit without the dreaded Cartman picture and blurb: Error message java.lang.NullPointerException: null Error stack trace org.hwbot.web.actions.InitEditResultAction.run line 110 org.hwbot.web.actions.HwbotAction.execute line 29 org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.processActionPerform line 431 org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.process line 236 org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.process line 1196 org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.doGet line 414 javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service line 690 javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service line 803 org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter line 290 org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter line 206 It only happens with about half my results, but stupidly annoying having to delete a result then resubmit. It's only a recent error - am I the only one?