anvil

Thor941, no offense but everyone is supposed to know the rules. If scores are not following the rules, absence of knowledge is not an excuse.

Ok thank you for the answer, I didn't know where to look with all the links you provided.

Can we know exactly what kind of bench it is about? Can somebody give us the link?

On the link provided by NeoForce you can read that it has been posted the 20th of January. Edition of this page or the specific rules since? Impossible for me to know...

I will appreciate, but unfortunately for you I have more screenshots to show than you do.

Wrong, I ask one your scores for moderation, and then all of you came on OCM to mess! Do not invert please, I have screenshots for this if you want.

Sometimes it can help to see the true nature of people.

The interesting thing is that their messages are forum dependant: Do you need a translation Neoforce?

Concerning Jmax's post. I didn't know about the subset in ORB link, so if it is so, all submitted benchmarks containing an ORB link have to be validated or removed from moderation. Except from JMH members I have never heard about people saying that you share hardware. Some forum links will be interesting. The words I have said on OCM are completely fair for me also, and they are reflecting my thoughts, and so they are not going to change in the next days. I'm not saying that you shared your Hardware Jmax, I just said that pictures were useless for this kind of decision. Read again my sentences, you'll see. Is the brand of the GPUs displayed somewhere in ORB links? If this kind of information exists and that it is not fakeable so it will be helpfull in results moderation.

Please stop saying that you don't understand why they have been moderated. The screenshots are not following the rules, simply as that. There is no issue of hardware sharing, I don't where you get that... I can feel it coming so I will add that, there is no cheating mentionned. Concerning sharing hardware, pictures will never be a proof. As I already said on another thread in another forum, if a team has 5 identical GPU and that one is golden able to bench 50 MHz higher than the four others, nothing prevent the team from using exactly this golden one for the benchs, and they still be able to provide a descend picture of all the hardware. Unfortunately, except benching in front of a public or sending hardware to another team so that other people will be able to check the max frequencies, it is really difficult to proove the unsharing.

Is Richbastard aware of this situation? I think so, but what are his thoughts? Why he his not present on this important thread?

R1ch do you want to create a facebook group with me? The group will be: "For a Wprime mandatory screenshot on Hwbot!" To the crew : no offense, just joking!

Who is this person? Can you guys ask for him to do that? I don't know a lot in programming, but I don't think this is a titanic task.

Obviously all benchmark made before the new rule are considered as accepted benchmark. It has always been the case for others changing rules, so why it will be different for this one?

To the crew: just update Wprime rules! I'm asking this screenshot for ages now, just ask for a mandatory screenshot to prove the hardware and also the software used, both at the same time. I don't think this is really complicated for you! Put a news in the main page in BOLD and that's all (folks)! anvil

Hi, go to the helpcenter for this kind of request.

Hey guys, I was just looking at some hardwares and I found this: http://img9.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sanstitrenlc.jpg There is a mistake somewhere... And also I was wondering something. I have a lot of computers under Linux, and I want to know if a screenshot of "cat /proc/cpuinfo" would be valid as a CPU-Z submitted score. I am not capable of installing windows emulators on these Linux machines because of super user issues. Thank you for the info. anvil

Hi, I already asked to give a screenshot with the score of Wprime a long time ago (november 2008)... http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=2374 So this took more time than you thought R1ch.... I don't know if a screenshot is now part of the rules, but I think the moderation has now to focus on Wprime more than other benchmark. Cheers. anvil

Same bugged run here, I have already reported as wrong: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=829346

Thank you for the new function!

Perhaps my english is not good enough... I am referring about eliminating cheaters. Do you understood that Hwbot was making cheaters?

Ok, thank you for the answers. Tapakah has been present on Hwbot for a long period. Too long if you ask me. But this is another story. Hope cheating will stop one day, you are the only one making this happen. See you.

Just wanted to know if the ban will be permanent. If it so, I totally disaggree and not because I'm part of his team. Tapakah has cheated also and he is still ranked in Hwbot. Take care not to ban "low" users and allow "high" users when they both cheat! EDIT: I take Tapakah as an example but I think there are many others. I just took the worst one.

Hi all, for me he is cheating too. Look at his Super pi, on the screenshot we can easily see that it is a copy/paste of the inside of the super pi window (look at the black line juste below calculate/about/stop. This black line is not completely present and it should be. Don't tell me this is a bug during the .jpg compression I will not believe you. As a member of the Union Francophone Hwbot I am really sad to see that... EDIT: It is the same for Super Pi 32M. Look the windows have not the same theme... For Pifast it is more difficult because, this bench always have this windows classic shape...

Can we know the progresses made?