Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

bolc

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    689

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Posts posted by bolc

    Set of timings for DDR3 Elpida Hyper

    in Memory Heaven (air/extreme)

    Posted · Edited by bolc

    23 minutes ago, Noxinite said:

    You can probably run: 6-6-5-18-1T 4-48-5-4-26-4-4-6 4-5-4-15-4-4-4-4-4-8-8-7.

    I tried to find my 2000MHz 6-6-4 32M run (with hypers on phase), but couldn't find it. :(

    thks i will give it a try but it does not like me putting 4s instead of 5s in the tertiaries

    nope it won t do the listing a decent voltage, or at all. :)

    trfc52 goes fine though. trrc48 boots but will need more voltage, at 1.82 the spi32m time goes longer.


    i need to check the impact of faw and tWRRD on performance, then trfc and tras, and i will be done for now :D

    and next, 776 20 ishish so i can redo my 2500k spi32m score :D
     

    Set of timings for DDR3 Elpida Hyper

    in Memory Heaven (air/extreme)

    Posted · Edited by bolc

    10 hours ago, Noxinite said:

    Different platforms sometimes seem to have different subtimings in bios. Or they're renamed or linked to other timings.

    775 timings look a lot different to 1150 is what I was trying to say.

    yep I got you, this is clearly different form the g3258 / m7 series language i am used to :D

    I tried some 1800  6 6 5 17 1t trfc=56 with tight subtimings.
    I know some tWRRD dr dd and tWRWR dr dd need to be = 5 or it won t post.

    I will post some screenshots and if you have advices guys, let me know. the next question will be: is it more efficient to have these low values or should I increase some back ...

    max safe voltage on hypers is 1.85 ...? (if I want to keep those sticks :D) ; on psc i can bench up to 1.95 but i rarely use more than 1.85-1.88 in life given i rarely use 2600+ cas8...

     

    Set of timings for DDR3 Elpida Hyper

    in Memory Heaven (air/extreme)

    Posted · Edited by bolc

    10 hours ago, suzuki said:

    These are from that run with 990x.

    Dimm voltage was 1.90v .

    E43B8BB4-F9B4-4DCF-8153-5F24B69B743C.jpeg

    thanks I will try to translate that into ivy/haswell lanuages :D

    but it goes fine I think
    tddWrTWr = tWRWR dd  in haswell terms
    tsrWrTWr = TWRWR I guess
    tdrRdTWr = TWRRD dr
    etc

    overall i have much lower values, except for first three 8 8 14 which I have at 8 8 8 , and derived form the auto. the 3 values i haven t lowered yet.  
    would you share your secondaries, I am interested in tWR in fact. currently at 8. it does1800 mhz with at the moment :
    6 6 5 17 1t 3 56 8 3 20 3 5 5 for 2ndaries, as listed in asrock configurator order

    spi32m did 18 loops out of 24, not far from the stability  :D bump at 1.78 V

    • Like 1

    G.Skill ECO 1600 7-8-7 1.35v

    in Memory Heaven (air/extreme)

    Posted · Edited by bolc

    if i were you i d start right away on 1150 haswell refresh or regular should do, at 2400 mhz 8-11-8-28-1t with fairly tight followings
    4-88-10-4-26-3-4-7
    4-5-4-15-5-4-4-4-4-11-11-10
    one stick at a time, see if they boot at 1.8 V (put a fan on the ram), then try to pass spi32m.

    SuperPI 32M Low Clock - Fastest Per Architecture

    in General overclocking

    Posted

    On 10/15/2018 at 12:27 AM, suzuki said:

    One from me,other will follow,i hope.

     

    Suzuki- 8m41s922- i7 990x@ 3991 MHz, NB @ 4540 Mhz, EVGA X58 Classified E770, 3 x 2GB Supertalent  @ 936 6-6-5-18-52 1T

     

    53962FC9-C648-4191-BA6C-80E031469FFF.png

    Nice score man !
    Are these Elpida Hyper starting in 6 6 5 18 1t trfc=52 ?

    I have been through ddr2 d9gmh and ddr3 psc or samsung, but have no clue for elpida hyper how much i can tighten timings, secondaries tertiaries in particular...

    Cheers

    The official HWBOT Team Cup 2018 - SC4: DDR4 thread.

    in HWBOT Competitions

    Posted

    16 hours ago, Matsglobetrotter said:

    thats not the issue Leeg. we are two members who have submitted 7740 x results. meanwhile i have also submitted a 7350 score that per core is higher than all. but as the overall summary score is higher the per core score is not considered.

    if u haven t tried: delete your 2 scores and resub the highest 7350, by retyping all the info. Do not use a previous sub info, which can m,ess up things around

    9900K ES sample

    in League Discussions

    Posted · Edited by bolc

    that was my understanding, current ES = elite (current = 9xxxk, but also the other 1151?)


    is cpu-z 1.86 telling the right thing (Es or not) regarding 9900K, or we should wait for 1.87 ?

    9900K ES sample

    in League Discussions

    Posted · Edited by bolc

    Hi all,

    not sure if this is the right place but the question comes down to the league in the end. So i thought it might be good here.

    I was thinking buying a 9900K ans was proposed a piece based on a cpu-z screenshot, telling it is ES hardware.

    Then I took a look at the latest subs on Hwbot for 9900K and I see ES everywhere, for folks in the Extreme and Elite leagues.

    Is cpu-z mislabelling retail as ES? Or are Extreme benchers using ES while they should be Elite (or need to be promoted Elite) ?
    Before I buy, I'd like to know.

    Thanks

    leeghoofd - Core i5 2500K @ 5711MHz - 800 cb Cinebench - R15

    in Result Discussions

    Posted · Edited by bolc

    54 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:

    you take it way too seriously... as far too many here... no revenue, no ROI... just fun... but it's your right to report... no biggie, but I prefer to spend my time on bad/incorrect subs then rectifying futile typos...

    having the right frequency written helps to know if your score is in line with the efficiency of others or not. I generally open several subs similar or very different than mine to check details, see what ram timings/frequency were used, to get some idea if I can do better or not. but I don t do it for all of them... and i stumbled on yours and these 10 mhz (and your ram settings) which explained your better score.

    it is not a funny work indeed, but if GeorgeStorm catches this train and needs some help for those boring jobs in the future, if I can be helpful, let me know

×
×
  • Create New...